S. Voldman, D. Hui, L. Warriner, D. Young, R. Williams, J. Howard, V. Gross, W. Rausch, E. Leobangdung, M. Sherony, N. Rohrer, C. Akrout, F. Assaderaghi, G. Shahidi
{"title":"绝缘体上硅技术中的静电放电保护","authors":"S. Voldman, D. Hui, L. Warriner, D. Young, R. Williams, J. Howard, V. Gross, W. Rausch, E. Leobangdung, M. Sherony, N. Rohrer, C. Akrout, F. Assaderaghi, G. Shahidi","doi":"10.1109/SOI.1999.819858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection in silicon-on-insulator (SOI) semiconductor technology is perceived as a major roadblock for the SOI technology to become a viable mainstream contender for high-performance advanced CMOS semiconductor chips (Hu, 1994; Colinge, 1991). In this paper, our results in four successive SOI technology generations demonstrate that excellent ESD protection levels are achievable in SOI chips with no additional masking steps, process implants, costs or ESD design area. ESD results also show that the ESD robustness of the SOI ESD device is improving with partially depleted SOI MOSFET scaling from 0.25 to 0.12 /spl mu/m L/sub eff/ technology generations (Shahidi et al., 1999; Voldman et al., 1995, 1997, 1999). By allowing the ESD network minimum design to scale with the technology, improved ESD results are evident in each generation with no indication of any SOI-specific ESD limitations. For future technology generations below 1.5 V V/sub DD/ power supply, continued improvement is anticipated due to buried-oxide scaling, lower trigger voltages, dynamic threshold voltage MOSFET (DTMOS) techniques and ESD I/O design learning (Voldman et al, 1997; Assaderaghi et al., 1994). ESD protection of partially depleted SOI technology is not a problem or technology concern using our proposed ESD methodology.","PeriodicalId":117832,"journal":{"name":"1999 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36345)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrostatic discharge protection in silicon-on-insulator technology\",\"authors\":\"S. Voldman, D. Hui, L. Warriner, D. Young, R. Williams, J. Howard, V. Gross, W. Rausch, E. Leobangdung, M. Sherony, N. Rohrer, C. Akrout, F. Assaderaghi, G. Shahidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOI.1999.819858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection in silicon-on-insulator (SOI) semiconductor technology is perceived as a major roadblock for the SOI technology to become a viable mainstream contender for high-performance advanced CMOS semiconductor chips (Hu, 1994; Colinge, 1991). In this paper, our results in four successive SOI technology generations demonstrate that excellent ESD protection levels are achievable in SOI chips with no additional masking steps, process implants, costs or ESD design area. ESD results also show that the ESD robustness of the SOI ESD device is improving with partially depleted SOI MOSFET scaling from 0.25 to 0.12 /spl mu/m L/sub eff/ technology generations (Shahidi et al., 1999; Voldman et al., 1995, 1997, 1999). By allowing the ESD network minimum design to scale with the technology, improved ESD results are evident in each generation with no indication of any SOI-specific ESD limitations. For future technology generations below 1.5 V V/sub DD/ power supply, continued improvement is anticipated due to buried-oxide scaling, lower trigger voltages, dynamic threshold voltage MOSFET (DTMOS) techniques and ESD I/O design learning (Voldman et al, 1997; Assaderaghi et al., 1994). ESD protection of partially depleted SOI technology is not a problem or technology concern using our proposed ESD methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1999 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36345)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1999 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36345)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOI.1999.819858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36345)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOI.1999.819858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
摘要
绝缘体上硅(SOI)半导体技术中的静电放电(ESD)保护被认为是SOI技术成为高性能先进CMOS半导体芯片可行的主流竞争者的主要障碍(Hu, 1994;Colinge, 1991)。在本文中,我们对连续四代SOI技术的研究结果表明,在SOI芯片中,无需额外的屏蔽步骤、工艺植入、成本或ESD设计面积,即可实现出色的ESD保护水平。ESD结果还表明,随着部分耗尽的SOI MOSFET从0.25到0.12 /spl mu/m L/sub /技术世代,SOI ESD器件的ESD稳健性正在提高(Shahidi et al., 1999;Voldman et al., 1995,1997,1999)。通过允许ESD网络最小设计随技术扩展,每一代的ESD效果都得到了明显改善,没有任何特定于soi的ESD限制。对于低于1.5 V/sub DD/电源的未来技术世代,由于埋地氧化缩放、较低触发电压、动态阈值电压MOSFET (DTMOS)技术和ESD I/O设计学习,预计将继续改进(Voldman等,1997;Assaderaghi et al., 1994)。使用我们提出的ESD方法,部分耗尽SOI技术的ESD保护不是一个问题或技术关注。
Electrostatic discharge protection in silicon-on-insulator technology
Electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection in silicon-on-insulator (SOI) semiconductor technology is perceived as a major roadblock for the SOI technology to become a viable mainstream contender for high-performance advanced CMOS semiconductor chips (Hu, 1994; Colinge, 1991). In this paper, our results in four successive SOI technology generations demonstrate that excellent ESD protection levels are achievable in SOI chips with no additional masking steps, process implants, costs or ESD design area. ESD results also show that the ESD robustness of the SOI ESD device is improving with partially depleted SOI MOSFET scaling from 0.25 to 0.12 /spl mu/m L/sub eff/ technology generations (Shahidi et al., 1999; Voldman et al., 1995, 1997, 1999). By allowing the ESD network minimum design to scale with the technology, improved ESD results are evident in each generation with no indication of any SOI-specific ESD limitations. For future technology generations below 1.5 V V/sub DD/ power supply, continued improvement is anticipated due to buried-oxide scaling, lower trigger voltages, dynamic threshold voltage MOSFET (DTMOS) techniques and ESD I/O design learning (Voldman et al, 1997; Assaderaghi et al., 1994). ESD protection of partially depleted SOI technology is not a problem or technology concern using our proposed ESD methodology.