服务恢复悖论:正确但被高估?

Stefan Michel, M. Meuter
{"title":"服务恢复悖论:正确但被高估?","authors":"Stefan Michel, M. Meuter","doi":"10.1108/09564230810891897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The paper's aim is to test the existence of the service recovery paradox.Design/methodology/approach – To date, much of the literature exploring the service recovery paradox has generated mixed results. The paper argues that a service recovery paradox is a rare event, which makes its measurement difficult, since the “treatment group” sample size is usually too small to produce significant results. For that reason, the existence of the service recovery paradox in a banking context with more than 11,000 customer interviews based on actual customer encounters is tested.Findings – Overall, the survey findings support the argument that a service recovery paradox is a rare event, and the hypothesized mean differences are, albeit significant, not very large, which diminishes their managerial relevance to some degree.Research limitations/implications – Because of the required extremely large sample size, no multi‐item measures were collected. Furthermore, privacy concerns restricted us from a longitudin...","PeriodicalId":102812,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Service Industry Management","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The service recovery paradox: true but overrated?\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Michel, M. Meuter\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09564230810891897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The paper's aim is to test the existence of the service recovery paradox.Design/methodology/approach – To date, much of the literature exploring the service recovery paradox has generated mixed results. The paper argues that a service recovery paradox is a rare event, which makes its measurement difficult, since the “treatment group” sample size is usually too small to produce significant results. For that reason, the existence of the service recovery paradox in a banking context with more than 11,000 customer interviews based on actual customer encounters is tested.Findings – Overall, the survey findings support the argument that a service recovery paradox is a rare event, and the hypothesized mean differences are, albeit significant, not very large, which diminishes their managerial relevance to some degree.Research limitations/implications – Because of the required extremely large sample size, no multi‐item measures were collected. Furthermore, privacy concerns restricted us from a longitudin...\",\"PeriodicalId\":102812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Service Industry Management\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Service Industry Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230810891897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Service Industry Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230810891897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

目的:本文的目的是检验服务恢复悖论的存在性。设计/方法论/方法——迄今为止,许多探索服务恢复悖论的文献产生了不同的结果。本文认为,服务恢复悖论是一个罕见的事件,这使得其测量困难,因为“治疗组”的样本量通常太小,无法产生显著的结果。出于这个原因,服务恢复悖论的存在在一个银行环境中进行了测试,该环境中有超过11,000个基于实际客户接触的客户访谈。调查结果-总体而言,调查结果支持这样的论点,即服务恢复悖论是一个罕见的事件,假设的平均差异虽然显著,但不是很大,这在某种程度上削弱了它们的管理相关性。研究限制/影响-由于需要的样本量非常大,因此没有收集多项目测量。此外,隐私问题限制了我们从纵向…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The service recovery paradox: true but overrated?
Purpose – The paper's aim is to test the existence of the service recovery paradox.Design/methodology/approach – To date, much of the literature exploring the service recovery paradox has generated mixed results. The paper argues that a service recovery paradox is a rare event, which makes its measurement difficult, since the “treatment group” sample size is usually too small to produce significant results. For that reason, the existence of the service recovery paradox in a banking context with more than 11,000 customer interviews based on actual customer encounters is tested.Findings – Overall, the survey findings support the argument that a service recovery paradox is a rare event, and the hypothesized mean differences are, albeit significant, not very large, which diminishes their managerial relevance to some degree.Research limitations/implications – Because of the required extremely large sample size, no multi‐item measures were collected. Furthermore, privacy concerns restricted us from a longitudin...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信