驱动点回路增益和返回比

A. Ochoa, Donnie Patterson, M. McGuckin
{"title":"驱动点回路增益和返回比","authors":"A. Ochoa, Donnie Patterson, M. McGuckin","doi":"10.1109/MWSCAS.2019.8884926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stability in feedback analog circuits is measured as phase margin obtained from the system loop gain function. While different functions have been used to represent loop gain, generally these functions yield similar phase margins so that the designer is usually not concerned with the particular function used. A development and comparison of two main approaches to finding loop gain, one focusing on a controlled source, Bode’s Return Ratio, the other keeping circuit variables foremost, the driving point impedance approach, leading to different ‘loop gain’ representations is presented. The source of this difference is found, concluding that the approach using a circuit focus analysis produces consistent results for phase margin while the Return Ratio may not making the former the preferred method.","PeriodicalId":287815,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 62nd International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving Point Loop Gain and Return Ratio\",\"authors\":\"A. Ochoa, Donnie Patterson, M. McGuckin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MWSCAS.2019.8884926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stability in feedback analog circuits is measured as phase margin obtained from the system loop gain function. While different functions have been used to represent loop gain, generally these functions yield similar phase margins so that the designer is usually not concerned with the particular function used. A development and comparison of two main approaches to finding loop gain, one focusing on a controlled source, Bode’s Return Ratio, the other keeping circuit variables foremost, the driving point impedance approach, leading to different ‘loop gain’ representations is presented. The source of this difference is found, concluding that the approach using a circuit focus analysis produces consistent results for phase margin while the Return Ratio may not making the former the preferred method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 62nd International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 62nd International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS.2019.8884926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 62nd International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS.2019.8884926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

反馈模拟电路的稳定性是用系统环路增益函数得到的相位裕度来测量的。虽然使用了不同的函数来表示环路增益,但通常这些函数产生相似的相位裕度,因此设计人员通常不关心所使用的特定函数。发展和比较两种主要的方法来寻找环路增益,一个集中在一个受控源,波德的返回比,另一个保持电路变量最重要,驱动点阻抗方法,导致不同的“环路增益”表示提出。发现了这种差异的来源,得出结论,使用电路焦点分析的方法对相位裕度产生一致的结果,而返回比可能不会使前者成为首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Driving Point Loop Gain and Return Ratio
Stability in feedback analog circuits is measured as phase margin obtained from the system loop gain function. While different functions have been used to represent loop gain, generally these functions yield similar phase margins so that the designer is usually not concerned with the particular function used. A development and comparison of two main approaches to finding loop gain, one focusing on a controlled source, Bode’s Return Ratio, the other keeping circuit variables foremost, the driving point impedance approach, leading to different ‘loop gain’ representations is presented. The source of this difference is found, concluding that the approach using a circuit focus analysis produces consistent results for phase margin while the Return Ratio may not making the former the preferred method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信