最高法院对恐同症的刑事定罪和对刑事判例形成的可能限制

R. Figueiredo, Fábio Roque DA Silva Araújo
{"title":"最高法院对恐同症的刑事定罪和对刑事判例形成的可能限制","authors":"R. Figueiredo, Fábio Roque DA Silva Araújo","doi":"10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to ascertain whether there are limits to the formation of criminal precedents, as well as what those limits would be, based on the analysis of the decision regarding the criminalization of homophobia by the Supreme Federal Court. To do, through a qualitative research, using the deductive method and the bibliographic review technique, it is necessary to study the need for homophobia criminalization, the decision mentioned, as well as the analysis of judicial activism in which it matters and the possible limits for the formation of precedents in the criminal sphere. It appears that the determination to apply Law n°. 7.716 / 89 to homophobic behavior by Federal Supreme Court goes beyond its jurisdiction and does not observe the principle of legality, neither does the prohibition of the analogy in malam partem .","PeriodicalId":425034,"journal":{"name":"Revista Thesis Juris","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A criminalização da homofobia pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal e os possíveis limites na formação dos precedentes penais\",\"authors\":\"R. Figueiredo, Fábio Roque DA Silva Araújo\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to ascertain whether there are limits to the formation of criminal precedents, as well as what those limits would be, based on the analysis of the decision regarding the criminalization of homophobia by the Supreme Federal Court. To do, through a qualitative research, using the deductive method and the bibliographic review technique, it is necessary to study the need for homophobia criminalization, the decision mentioned, as well as the analysis of judicial activism in which it matters and the possible limits for the formation of precedents in the criminal sphere. It appears that the determination to apply Law n°. 7.716 / 89 to homophobic behavior by Federal Supreme Court goes beyond its jurisdiction and does not observe the principle of legality, neither does the prohibition of the analogy in malam partem .\",\"PeriodicalId\":425034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Thesis Juris\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Thesis Juris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Thesis Juris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v9i1.16546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在通过分析最高联邦法院关于将恐同定为刑事犯罪的决定,确定刑事判例的形成是否存在限制,以及这些限制将是什么。要做到这一点,有必要通过定性研究,使用演绎法和文献回顾技术,研究将同性恋恐惧症定为刑事犯罪的必要性,提到的决定,以及对司法能动主义的分析,这一点很重要,并在刑事领域形成先例的可能限制。看来,适用法律的决心。7.716 / 89联邦最高法院对恐同行为的限制超出了其管辖范围,没有遵守合法性原则,禁止在malam部分类比也没有遵守合法性原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A criminalização da homofobia pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal e os possíveis limites na formação dos precedentes penais
This article aims to ascertain whether there are limits to the formation of criminal precedents, as well as what those limits would be, based on the analysis of the decision regarding the criminalization of homophobia by the Supreme Federal Court. To do, through a qualitative research, using the deductive method and the bibliographic review technique, it is necessary to study the need for homophobia criminalization, the decision mentioned, as well as the analysis of judicial activism in which it matters and the possible limits for the formation of precedents in the criminal sphere. It appears that the determination to apply Law n°. 7.716 / 89 to homophobic behavior by Federal Supreme Court goes beyond its jurisdiction and does not observe the principle of legality, neither does the prohibition of the analogy in malam partem .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信