{"title":"沿海社区的社会经济地位和生活条件:对西非塞拉利昂稀缺河口红树林生态系统的影响","authors":"K. J. Konoyima, Raymond Johnson","doi":"10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.88.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted between the periods of March 2015 to December 2015 in the Scarcies Estuary, Sierra Leone. Participatory methods such as Focused Group Discussion (FGD), Interviews and ranking exercises were used for the assessment. The objective of this study is to assess the social and economic constraints of coastal communities, and how such constraints have influenced mangrove loss in the area. Knowledge on those is scarce for this region. The study will contribute to improving sustainable management agenda for mangrove forests in the Scarcies Estuaries. Results show a more active and productive age range of respondents (31-40 years), capable enough to make decisions that could influence resource use. A Student’s t-test showed no significant difference in sex at (P>0.05) for male (70%) and female (30%) mangrove dependents. In addition, of the various mangroves related economic activities, oyster collection and farming remained the most important with income above One Million Leones (>115USD) per week and per farming season respectively. Further, key constraints in the communities included inadequate health centers, educational facilities and lack of basic material assets. Multiple households in a dwelling unit are also a common residential arrangement in these areas. Such living conditions are in the context of the definition of poverty with such outcomes as deprived resources such as money and assets, poor health and illiteracy. Hence, it is increasingly evident that the conservation of mangroves in this region cannot be done without considering the varying impacts of poverty, gender roles and resource utilisation patterns. Introduction Mangroves live at the interface between land and sea in tropical and subtropical latitudes [1– 4]. However, mangroves are dependent on the coast, for which humans also have a preference [5]. Nearly 120 million people will live within 10km of the remaining large mangrove habitats by 2015 [5]. This ecosystem is key for enormous abiotic and biological resources and offers a mixture of ecosystem services from which humanity benefits [6–8]. These services can be categorized into provisioning, supporting and regulating, and cultural [9–10]. Provisioning services include (i) fisheries production [11–15]; (ii) production of timber and wood [1, 16]; (iii) Medicinal purposes [17]. Supporting and regulating services include (i) carbon sequestration [2, 18, 19]; (ii) climate regulation [5, 20-22]; (iii) shoreline stabilization and coastal protection [23–25]; (iv) water filtration [26] and pollution regulation [27–29]; Mangroves also provide a suite of cultural and aesthetic services, which include: (i) recreation and tourism [30]; (ii) educational opportunities [5, 31, 32]; (iii) aesthetic and cultural values [32–33]. Cumulatively, the ecosystem services contribute to the socioeconomic wellbeing of coastal communities [5, 34, 35]. [36] had also shown that the majority of people living in mangrove areas globally are fishermen, deriving their livelihood from fishing and related activities. In addition, [5] argued that the way mangroves are valued by people around the world differ greatly and are influenced by culture, heritage and the level of dependence on mangroves for local livelihoods and well-being. Notwithstanding, despite widespread knowledge of their value, the distribution of mangroves has decreased globally. Some 2,260 nationally designated and 285 internationally recognized sites worldwide contain about 41% of the world’s remaining mangroves [5]. One-third of global mangroves have been lost over a 50-year period due to anthropogenic activities [37]. Studies have International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Submitted: 2019-01-28 ISSN: 2300-2697, Vol. 88, pp 1-14 Revised: 2019-03-20 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.88.1 Accepted: 2019-04-3","PeriodicalId":171214,"journal":{"name":"International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-Economic Status and Living Conditions of Coastal Communities: Impacts on the Mangrove Ecosystems in the Scarcies Estuaries, Sierra Leone, West Africa\",\"authors\":\"K. J. Konoyima, Raymond Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.88.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research was conducted between the periods of March 2015 to December 2015 in the Scarcies Estuary, Sierra Leone. Participatory methods such as Focused Group Discussion (FGD), Interviews and ranking exercises were used for the assessment. The objective of this study is to assess the social and economic constraints of coastal communities, and how such constraints have influenced mangrove loss in the area. Knowledge on those is scarce for this region. The study will contribute to improving sustainable management agenda for mangrove forests in the Scarcies Estuaries. Results show a more active and productive age range of respondents (31-40 years), capable enough to make decisions that could influence resource use. A Student’s t-test showed no significant difference in sex at (P>0.05) for male (70%) and female (30%) mangrove dependents. In addition, of the various mangroves related economic activities, oyster collection and farming remained the most important with income above One Million Leones (>115USD) per week and per farming season respectively. Further, key constraints in the communities included inadequate health centers, educational facilities and lack of basic material assets. Multiple households in a dwelling unit are also a common residential arrangement in these areas. Such living conditions are in the context of the definition of poverty with such outcomes as deprived resources such as money and assets, poor health and illiteracy. Hence, it is increasingly evident that the conservation of mangroves in this region cannot be done without considering the varying impacts of poverty, gender roles and resource utilisation patterns. Introduction Mangroves live at the interface between land and sea in tropical and subtropical latitudes [1– 4]. However, mangroves are dependent on the coast, for which humans also have a preference [5]. Nearly 120 million people will live within 10km of the remaining large mangrove habitats by 2015 [5]. This ecosystem is key for enormous abiotic and biological resources and offers a mixture of ecosystem services from which humanity benefits [6–8]. These services can be categorized into provisioning, supporting and regulating, and cultural [9–10]. Provisioning services include (i) fisheries production [11–15]; (ii) production of timber and wood [1, 16]; (iii) Medicinal purposes [17]. Supporting and regulating services include (i) carbon sequestration [2, 18, 19]; (ii) climate regulation [5, 20-22]; (iii) shoreline stabilization and coastal protection [23–25]; (iv) water filtration [26] and pollution regulation [27–29]; Mangroves also provide a suite of cultural and aesthetic services, which include: (i) recreation and tourism [30]; (ii) educational opportunities [5, 31, 32]; (iii) aesthetic and cultural values [32–33]. Cumulatively, the ecosystem services contribute to the socioeconomic wellbeing of coastal communities [5, 34, 35]. [36] had also shown that the majority of people living in mangrove areas globally are fishermen, deriving their livelihood from fishing and related activities. In addition, [5] argued that the way mangroves are valued by people around the world differ greatly and are influenced by culture, heritage and the level of dependence on mangroves for local livelihoods and well-being. Notwithstanding, despite widespread knowledge of their value, the distribution of mangroves has decreased globally. Some 2,260 nationally designated and 285 internationally recognized sites worldwide contain about 41% of the world’s remaining mangroves [5]. One-third of global mangroves have been lost over a 50-year period due to anthropogenic activities [37]. Studies have International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Submitted: 2019-01-28 ISSN: 2300-2697, Vol. 88, pp 1-14 Revised: 2019-03-20 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.88.1 Accepted: 2019-04-3\",\"PeriodicalId\":171214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.88.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.88.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究于2015年3月至2015年12月在塞拉利昂的Scarcies河口进行。参与性方法,如焦点小组讨论(FGD)、访谈和排名练习被用于评估。本研究的目的是评估沿海社区的社会和经济制约因素,以及这些制约因素如何影响该地区的红树林损失。这方面的知识在本地区是稀缺的。这项研究将有助于改善稀缺河口红树林的可持续管理议程。结果显示,年龄层的受访者(31-40岁)更加积极和富有生产力,有足够的能力做出可能影响资源利用的决定。经学生t检验,雄性(70%)和雌性(30%)在性别上无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,在各种与红树林相关的经济活动中,牡蛎采集和养殖仍然是最重要的,每周和每个农作季的收入分别超过100万莱昂内(>115美元)。此外,社区的主要制约因素包括保健中心、教育设施不足和缺乏基本物质资产。在这些地区,多户住在一个住宅单位也是一种常见的住宅安排。这种生活条件是在贫穷定义的范围内,其结果是剥夺诸如金钱和资产等资源、健康状况差和文盲。因此,越来越明显的是,如果不考虑贫穷、性别角色和资源利用模式的不同影响,就不能在这个区域保护红树林。红树林生长在热带和亚热带地区陆地与海洋的交界地带[1 - 4]。然而,红树林依赖海岸,人类对海岸也有偏好[5]。到2015年,将有近1.2亿人居住在距仅存的大型红树林栖息地10公里范围内[5]。该生态系统是巨大的非生物和生物资源的关键,并提供人类受益的混合生态系统服务[6-8]。这些服务可分为供应服务、支持和调节服务以及文化服务[9-10]。供应服务包括:(i)渔业生产[11-15];木材和木材的生产[1,16];(iii)医药用途[17]。支持和调节服务包括:(i)碳固存[2,18,19];(ii)气候调节[5,20 -22];(iii)岸线稳定和海岸保护[23-25];(iv)水过滤[26]和污染调节[27-29];红树林还提供一系列文化和美学服务,其中包括:(i)娱乐和旅游[30];(ii)教育机会[5,31,32];(iii)审美和文化价值[32-33]。累积起来,生态系统服务有助于沿海社区的社会经济福祉[5,34,35]。[36]还表明,全球红树林地区的大多数居民是渔民,他们的生计来自捕鱼和相关活动。此外,[5]认为,世界各地人们对红树林的重视方式差异很大,并受到文化、遗产和当地生计和福祉对红树林的依赖程度的影响。然而,尽管人们对红树林的价值有广泛的认识,但红树林在全球的分布已经减少。全世界约有2260个国家指定和285个国际认可的红树林保护区,约占世界现存红树林的41%[5]。在过去50年里,由于人为活动,全球三分之一的红树林已经消失[37]。《Studies have International Letters of Social and humanities Sciences》提交日期:2019-01-28 ISSN: 2300-2697 Vol. 88, pp 1-14修回日期:2019-03-20 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.88.1收稿日期:2019-04-3
Socio-Economic Status and Living Conditions of Coastal Communities: Impacts on the Mangrove Ecosystems in the Scarcies Estuaries, Sierra Leone, West Africa
This research was conducted between the periods of March 2015 to December 2015 in the Scarcies Estuary, Sierra Leone. Participatory methods such as Focused Group Discussion (FGD), Interviews and ranking exercises were used for the assessment. The objective of this study is to assess the social and economic constraints of coastal communities, and how such constraints have influenced mangrove loss in the area. Knowledge on those is scarce for this region. The study will contribute to improving sustainable management agenda for mangrove forests in the Scarcies Estuaries. Results show a more active and productive age range of respondents (31-40 years), capable enough to make decisions that could influence resource use. A Student’s t-test showed no significant difference in sex at (P>0.05) for male (70%) and female (30%) mangrove dependents. In addition, of the various mangroves related economic activities, oyster collection and farming remained the most important with income above One Million Leones (>115USD) per week and per farming season respectively. Further, key constraints in the communities included inadequate health centers, educational facilities and lack of basic material assets. Multiple households in a dwelling unit are also a common residential arrangement in these areas. Such living conditions are in the context of the definition of poverty with such outcomes as deprived resources such as money and assets, poor health and illiteracy. Hence, it is increasingly evident that the conservation of mangroves in this region cannot be done without considering the varying impacts of poverty, gender roles and resource utilisation patterns. Introduction Mangroves live at the interface between land and sea in tropical and subtropical latitudes [1– 4]. However, mangroves are dependent on the coast, for which humans also have a preference [5]. Nearly 120 million people will live within 10km of the remaining large mangrove habitats by 2015 [5]. This ecosystem is key for enormous abiotic and biological resources and offers a mixture of ecosystem services from which humanity benefits [6–8]. These services can be categorized into provisioning, supporting and regulating, and cultural [9–10]. Provisioning services include (i) fisheries production [11–15]; (ii) production of timber and wood [1, 16]; (iii) Medicinal purposes [17]. Supporting and regulating services include (i) carbon sequestration [2, 18, 19]; (ii) climate regulation [5, 20-22]; (iii) shoreline stabilization and coastal protection [23–25]; (iv) water filtration [26] and pollution regulation [27–29]; Mangroves also provide a suite of cultural and aesthetic services, which include: (i) recreation and tourism [30]; (ii) educational opportunities [5, 31, 32]; (iii) aesthetic and cultural values [32–33]. Cumulatively, the ecosystem services contribute to the socioeconomic wellbeing of coastal communities [5, 34, 35]. [36] had also shown that the majority of people living in mangrove areas globally are fishermen, deriving their livelihood from fishing and related activities. In addition, [5] argued that the way mangroves are valued by people around the world differ greatly and are influenced by culture, heritage and the level of dependence on mangroves for local livelihoods and well-being. Notwithstanding, despite widespread knowledge of their value, the distribution of mangroves has decreased globally. Some 2,260 nationally designated and 285 internationally recognized sites worldwide contain about 41% of the world’s remaining mangroves [5]. One-third of global mangroves have been lost over a 50-year period due to anthropogenic activities [37]. Studies have International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Submitted: 2019-01-28 ISSN: 2300-2697, Vol. 88, pp 1-14 Revised: 2019-03-20 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.88.1 Accepted: 2019-04-3