印尼电子商务基于风险的在线争议解决模式的制定:法律框架及其应用

Soleh Hasan Wahid
{"title":"印尼电子商务基于风险的在线争议解决模式的制定:法律框架及其应用","authors":"Soleh Hasan Wahid","doi":"10.32996/ijahs.2023.3.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-commerce growth in Indonesia has resulted in increased consumer disputes. This study aims to establish a regulatory framework for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in Indonesia using a normative legal research methodology. Secondary data from various sources, including ODR mechanisms from Shopee, Tokopedia, Bukalapak, and Indonesian regulations, were analyzed descriptively and comparatively. ODR offers benefits such as ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and avoidance of legal procedures but faces challenges like consumer awareness, standardization, and regulation. Ideal ODR models for Indonesia include E-Negotiation and E-Mediation, using AI mediators. Complex or high-risk disputes may require E-Mediation with professional mediators and Arbitration with neutral third parties. Implementing ODR models in e-commerce can benefit businesses and consumers by efficiently resolving disputes, but the appropriate model depends on the dispute's risk and complexity. Collaboration between authorities and stakeholders is crucial for ensuring ODR effectiveness in e-commerce dispute resolution and developing a suitable legal framework in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":134830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formulation of a Risk-Based Online Dispute Resolution Model for E-Commerce in Indonesia: Legal Framework and its Application\",\"authors\":\"Soleh Hasan Wahid\",\"doi\":\"10.32996/ijahs.2023.3.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"E-commerce growth in Indonesia has resulted in increased consumer disputes. This study aims to establish a regulatory framework for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in Indonesia using a normative legal research methodology. Secondary data from various sources, including ODR mechanisms from Shopee, Tokopedia, Bukalapak, and Indonesian regulations, were analyzed descriptively and comparatively. ODR offers benefits such as ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and avoidance of legal procedures but faces challenges like consumer awareness, standardization, and regulation. Ideal ODR models for Indonesia include E-Negotiation and E-Mediation, using AI mediators. Complex or high-risk disputes may require E-Mediation with professional mediators and Arbitration with neutral third parties. Implementing ODR models in e-commerce can benefit businesses and consumers by efficiently resolving disputes, but the appropriate model depends on the dispute's risk and complexity. Collaboration between authorities and stakeholders is crucial for ensuring ODR effectiveness in e-commerce dispute resolution and developing a suitable legal framework in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2023.3.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2023.3.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼电子商务的增长导致了消费者纠纷的增加。本研究旨在使用规范的法律研究方法在印度尼西亚建立在线争议解决(ODR)的监管框架。对来自Shopee, Tokopedia, Bukalapak和印度尼西亚法规的ODR机制等各种来源的二手数据进行描述性和比较分析。ODR提供了易用性、成本效益和避免法律程序等优点,但也面临着消费者意识、标准化和监管等挑战。印度尼西亚理想的ODR模式包括使用人工智能调解员的E-Negotiation和E-Mediation。复杂或高风险的争议可能需要专业调解员的电子调解和中立第三方的仲裁。在电子商务中实现ODR模型可以有效地解决纠纷,从而使企业和消费者受益,但合适的模型取决于纠纷的风险和复杂性。当局和利益攸关方之间的合作对于确保ODR在电子商务争端解决方面的有效性和在印度尼西亚制定适当的法律框架至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formulation of a Risk-Based Online Dispute Resolution Model for E-Commerce in Indonesia: Legal Framework and its Application
E-commerce growth in Indonesia has resulted in increased consumer disputes. This study aims to establish a regulatory framework for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in Indonesia using a normative legal research methodology. Secondary data from various sources, including ODR mechanisms from Shopee, Tokopedia, Bukalapak, and Indonesian regulations, were analyzed descriptively and comparatively. ODR offers benefits such as ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and avoidance of legal procedures but faces challenges like consumer awareness, standardization, and regulation. Ideal ODR models for Indonesia include E-Negotiation and E-Mediation, using AI mediators. Complex or high-risk disputes may require E-Mediation with professional mediators and Arbitration with neutral third parties. Implementing ODR models in e-commerce can benefit businesses and consumers by efficiently resolving disputes, but the appropriate model depends on the dispute's risk and complexity. Collaboration between authorities and stakeholders is crucial for ensuring ODR effectiveness in e-commerce dispute resolution and developing a suitable legal framework in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信