国际搬迁纠纷与家事法律事务中的文化偏见风险

M. Strous
{"title":"国际搬迁纠纷与家事法律事务中的文化偏见风险","authors":"M. Strous","doi":"10.1163/15718182-31010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper discusses how judges and forensic experts can reach culturally biased decisions in family relocation matters, potentially compromising the best interests of children involved. The risk of reports and judgments being biased is particularly pronounced when cultural factors are focused upon selectively, while other relevant factors are overlooked. To mitigate this potential for cultural bias, several strategies are proposed. These include encouraging self-awareness in forensic experts and judges of their potential for bias, implementing a system of peer review in which decisions are reviewed by colleagues, providing a mandatory checklist of factors to be considered, and requiring transparency and accountability in forensic reports and relocation judgements.","PeriodicalId":217193,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","volume":"136 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Relocation Disputes and the Risk of Cultural Bias in Family Law Matters\",\"authors\":\"M. Strous\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718182-31010006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis paper discusses how judges and forensic experts can reach culturally biased decisions in family relocation matters, potentially compromising the best interests of children involved. The risk of reports and judgments being biased is particularly pronounced when cultural factors are focused upon selectively, while other relevant factors are overlooked. To mitigate this potential for cultural bias, several strategies are proposed. These include encouraging self-awareness in forensic experts and judges of their potential for bias, implementing a system of peer review in which decisions are reviewed by colleagues, providing a mandatory checklist of factors to be considered, and requiring transparency and accountability in forensic reports and relocation judgements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Children’s Rights\",\"volume\":\"136 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Children’s Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-31010006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-31010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了法官和法医专家如何在家庭搬迁问题上做出具有文化偏见的决定,这可能会损害所涉及儿童的最大利益。当有选择地关注文化因素,而忽视其他相关因素时,报告和判断有偏见的风险尤其明显。为了减轻这种潜在的文化偏见,提出了几种策略。这些措施包括鼓励法医专家和法官对自己可能存在偏见的自我意识,实施同行评议制度,由同事对决定进行评议,提供一份必须考虑的因素清单,并要求法医报告和重新安置判决具有透明度和问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Relocation Disputes and the Risk of Cultural Bias in Family Law Matters
This paper discusses how judges and forensic experts can reach culturally biased decisions in family relocation matters, potentially compromising the best interests of children involved. The risk of reports and judgments being biased is particularly pronounced when cultural factors are focused upon selectively, while other relevant factors are overlooked. To mitigate this potential for cultural bias, several strategies are proposed. These include encouraging self-awareness in forensic experts and judges of their potential for bias, implementing a system of peer review in which decisions are reviewed by colleagues, providing a mandatory checklist of factors to be considered, and requiring transparency and accountability in forensic reports and relocation judgements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信