价值分布的图形感知:非专家观众数据素养的评估

A. Zubiaga, Brian Mac Namee
{"title":"价值分布的图形感知:非专家观众数据素养的评估","authors":"A. Zubiaga, Brian Mac Namee","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An ability to understand the outputs of data analysis is a key characteristic of data literacy and the inclusion of data visualisations is ubiquitous in the output of modern data analysis. Several aspects still remain unresolved, however, on the question of choosing data visualisations that lead viewers to an optimal interpretation of data. This is especially true when audiences have differing degrees of data literacy. In this paper we describe two user studies on perception from data visualisations, in which we measured the ability of participants to validate statements about the distributions of data samples visualised using different chart types. In the first user study, we find that histograms are the most suitable chart type for illustrating the distribution of values for a variable. We contrast our findings with previous research in the field, and posit three main issues identified from the study. Most notably, however, we show that viewers struggle to identify scenarios in which a chart simply does not contain enough information to validate a statement about the data that it represents. In the follow-up study, we ask viewers questions about quantification of frequencies, and identification of most frequent values from different types of histograms and density traces showing one or two distributions of values. This study reveals that viewers do better with histograms when they need to quantify the values displayed in a chart. Among the different types of histograms, interspersing the bars of two distributions in a histogram leads to the most accurate perception. Even though interspersing bars makes them thinner, the advantage of having both distributions clearly visible pays off. The findings of these user studies provide insight to assist designers in creating optimal charts that enable comparison of distributions, and emphasise the importance of using an understanding of the limits of viewers’ data literacy to design charts effectively.","PeriodicalId":280460,"journal":{"name":"J. Community Informatics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graphical Perception of Value Distributions: An Evaluation of Non-Expert Viewers' Data Literacy\",\"authors\":\"A. Zubiaga, Brian Mac Namee\",\"doi\":\"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An ability to understand the outputs of data analysis is a key characteristic of data literacy and the inclusion of data visualisations is ubiquitous in the output of modern data analysis. Several aspects still remain unresolved, however, on the question of choosing data visualisations that lead viewers to an optimal interpretation of data. This is especially true when audiences have differing degrees of data literacy. In this paper we describe two user studies on perception from data visualisations, in which we measured the ability of participants to validate statements about the distributions of data samples visualised using different chart types. In the first user study, we find that histograms are the most suitable chart type for illustrating the distribution of values for a variable. We contrast our findings with previous research in the field, and posit three main issues identified from the study. Most notably, however, we show that viewers struggle to identify scenarios in which a chart simply does not contain enough information to validate a statement about the data that it represents. In the follow-up study, we ask viewers questions about quantification of frequencies, and identification of most frequent values from different types of histograms and density traces showing one or two distributions of values. This study reveals that viewers do better with histograms when they need to quantify the values displayed in a chart. Among the different types of histograms, interspersing the bars of two distributions in a histogram leads to the most accurate perception. Even though interspersing bars makes them thinner, the advantage of having both distributions clearly visible pays off. The findings of these user studies provide insight to assist designers in creating optimal charts that enable comparison of distributions, and emphasise the importance of using an understanding of the limits of viewers’ data literacy to design charts effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Community Informatics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Community Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Community Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

理解数据分析输出的能力是数据素养的一个关键特征,数据可视化在现代数据分析输出中无处不在。然而,在选择数据可视化以引导观众对数据进行最佳解释的问题上,仍有几个方面尚未解决。当受众具有不同程度的数据素养时尤其如此。在本文中,我们描述了两项关于数据可视化感知的用户研究,其中我们测量了参与者验证使用不同图表类型可视化的数据样本分布的陈述的能力。在第一个用户研究中,我们发现直方图是最适合用于说明变量值分布的图表类型。我们将我们的发现与该领域先前的研究进行了对比,并提出了从研究中确定的三个主要问题。然而,最值得注意的是,我们展示了观众很难识别图表根本不包含足够的信息来验证关于它所代表的数据的陈述的场景。在后续研究中,我们向观众提问有关频率量化的问题,以及从不同类型的直方图和密度迹中识别最频繁的值,这些直方图和密度迹显示值的一个或两个分布。这项研究表明,当观众需要量化图表中显示的值时,他们更擅长使用直方图。在不同类型的直方图中,将两个分布的柱状分布穿插在直方图中可以获得最准确的感知。尽管分散的条形图使它们更薄,但让两个分布都清晰可见的好处是值得的。这些用户研究的发现为帮助设计师创建能够比较分布的最佳图表提供了见解,并强调了利用对观众数据素养限制的理解来有效设计图表的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Graphical Perception of Value Distributions: An Evaluation of Non-Expert Viewers' Data Literacy
An ability to understand the outputs of data analysis is a key characteristic of data literacy and the inclusion of data visualisations is ubiquitous in the output of modern data analysis. Several aspects still remain unresolved, however, on the question of choosing data visualisations that lead viewers to an optimal interpretation of data. This is especially true when audiences have differing degrees of data literacy. In this paper we describe two user studies on perception from data visualisations, in which we measured the ability of participants to validate statements about the distributions of data samples visualised using different chart types. In the first user study, we find that histograms are the most suitable chart type for illustrating the distribution of values for a variable. We contrast our findings with previous research in the field, and posit three main issues identified from the study. Most notably, however, we show that viewers struggle to identify scenarios in which a chart simply does not contain enough information to validate a statement about the data that it represents. In the follow-up study, we ask viewers questions about quantification of frequencies, and identification of most frequent values from different types of histograms and density traces showing one or two distributions of values. This study reveals that viewers do better with histograms when they need to quantify the values displayed in a chart. Among the different types of histograms, interspersing the bars of two distributions in a histogram leads to the most accurate perception. Even though interspersing bars makes them thinner, the advantage of having both distributions clearly visible pays off. The findings of these user studies provide insight to assist designers in creating optimal charts that enable comparison of distributions, and emphasise the importance of using an understanding of the limits of viewers’ data literacy to design charts effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信