20世纪末至21世纪初俄罗斯和欧盟国家国史教科书:科学与政治的对话

N. M. Arsentyev
{"title":"20世纪末至21世纪初俄罗斯和欧盟国家国史教科书:科学与政治的对话","authors":"N. M. Arsentyev","doi":"10.15507/2078-9823.058.022.202202.117-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. One of the priorities in the development of modern historical education in the context of the globalization of the humanities space has become the formation of social practices that make it possible to discuss and coordinate world, national, regional and local content in the content of textbooks on Russian history. When organizing the system of teaching history in schools in Russia and EU countries, the position of the state is still decisive everywhere. The need to form a consensus in the interpretation of the past is caused by the growth of confrontation due to the polarization of public discourse and the growth of international tension. The increased attention of the world community to the politics of memory has intensified the interest of researchers in this topic.\n\nMethods. The methodological basis of the work was formed by modern methods of analysis of the historical and cultural heritage of the past. The study was carried out in line with the concepts that substantiate the periodic replacement of the ideals of education and upbringing, depending on the nature of state authorities. When studying the meanings of the ongoing modernization of historical education, the content analysis of media publications was widely used. The principles of historicism, objectivity, and consistency made it possible to fully, deeply and comprehensively consider the object of study in the context of modern development.\n\nDiscussion and Conclusion. The study has showed that school history education in the early 2020s still remains a conflict field in which the interests of states, interstate associations, public and confessional structures oppose in a variety of manifestations of influence on the formation of the worldview of young people. From 1996 to 2006, the modernization of historical education in Russia took place within the framework of the project “European Dimension in the Study of History”. Since 2007, a new intergovernmental educational project “Image of the Other in History Teaching” has been planned for three years, aimed at adapting the school process to the conditions of growing cultural diversity. However, in 2006, with the creation of a new historical and cultural educational standard on behalf of President Vladimir Putin, the reform of the school system of historical education no longer fit into the program for creating Greater Europe. Nevertheless, cooperation with the European Union in coordinating the content of school textbooks was continued. To prevent the deepening radicalization of public consciousness, our country, among 17 participating states, became a co-organizer of the Observatory for the Teaching of History, created at the initiative of France in November 2020, and on October 4–5, 2021, the First World Congress of School Teachers of History was held in Moscow. A study of the significant experience of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the European Union in the field of school education that has been accumulated since 1996 shows that a coordinated policy of memory is possible only with the expansion of cooperation between historians, a dialogue of specialists in the search for consensus on the most debatable and difficult to resolve issues in the history of Greater Europe, as well as the desire of politicians to peaceful coexistence and stability, the development of guarantees of equal security.","PeriodicalId":406854,"journal":{"name":"Humanitarian: actual problems of the humanities and education","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School Textbooks on the National History of Russia and EU Countries in the late XX – early XXI Century as a Dialogue Between Science and Politics\",\"authors\":\"N. M. Arsentyev\",\"doi\":\"10.15507/2078-9823.058.022.202202.117-127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. One of the priorities in the development of modern historical education in the context of the globalization of the humanities space has become the formation of social practices that make it possible to discuss and coordinate world, national, regional and local content in the content of textbooks on Russian history. When organizing the system of teaching history in schools in Russia and EU countries, the position of the state is still decisive everywhere. The need to form a consensus in the interpretation of the past is caused by the growth of confrontation due to the polarization of public discourse and the growth of international tension. The increased attention of the world community to the politics of memory has intensified the interest of researchers in this topic.\\n\\nMethods. The methodological basis of the work was formed by modern methods of analysis of the historical and cultural heritage of the past. The study was carried out in line with the concepts that substantiate the periodic replacement of the ideals of education and upbringing, depending on the nature of state authorities. When studying the meanings of the ongoing modernization of historical education, the content analysis of media publications was widely used. The principles of historicism, objectivity, and consistency made it possible to fully, deeply and comprehensively consider the object of study in the context of modern development.\\n\\nDiscussion and Conclusion. The study has showed that school history education in the early 2020s still remains a conflict field in which the interests of states, interstate associations, public and confessional structures oppose in a variety of manifestations of influence on the formation of the worldview of young people. From 1996 to 2006, the modernization of historical education in Russia took place within the framework of the project “European Dimension in the Study of History”. Since 2007, a new intergovernmental educational project “Image of the Other in History Teaching” has been planned for three years, aimed at adapting the school process to the conditions of growing cultural diversity. However, in 2006, with the creation of a new historical and cultural educational standard on behalf of President Vladimir Putin, the reform of the school system of historical education no longer fit into the program for creating Greater Europe. Nevertheless, cooperation with the European Union in coordinating the content of school textbooks was continued. To prevent the deepening radicalization of public consciousness, our country, among 17 participating states, became a co-organizer of the Observatory for the Teaching of History, created at the initiative of France in November 2020, and on October 4–5, 2021, the First World Congress of School Teachers of History was held in Moscow. A study of the significant experience of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the European Union in the field of school education that has been accumulated since 1996 shows that a coordinated policy of memory is possible only with the expansion of cooperation between historians, a dialogue of specialists in the search for consensus on the most debatable and difficult to resolve issues in the history of Greater Europe, as well as the desire of politicians to peaceful coexistence and stability, the development of guarantees of equal security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanitarian: actual problems of the humanities and education\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanitarian: actual problems of the humanities and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.058.022.202202.117-127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanitarian: actual problems of the humanities and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.058.022.202202.117-127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。在人文空间全球化的背景下,现代历史教育发展的重点之一是形成社会实践,使俄罗斯历史教科书的内容能够讨论和协调世界、民族、地区和地方内容。在组织俄罗斯和欧盟国家的学校历史教学体系时,国家的地位仍然是决定性的。在对过去的解释中形成共识的需要,是由于公共话语的两极分化和国际紧张局势的增长而导致的对抗的增长造成的。随着国际社会对记忆政治的日益关注,研究人员对这一课题的兴趣日益浓厚。这项工作的方法论基础是通过分析过去的历史和文化遗产的现代方法形成的。这项研究是根据根据国家当局的性质定期更换教育和养育理想的概念进行的。在研究正在进行的历史教育现代化的意义时,媒介出版物的内容分析被广泛使用。历史决定论原则、客观性原则、一致性原则,使我们能够在现代发展的背景下,对研究对象进行充分、深入、全面的思考。讨论与结论。研究表明,21世纪20年代初的学校历史教育仍然是一个冲突领域,国家、国家间协会、公共和宗教结构的利益以各种形式对年轻人世界观的形成产生影响。从1996年到2006年,俄罗斯的历史教育现代化是在“历史研究中的欧洲维度”项目框架内进行的。自2007年以来,一项新的政府间教育项目“历史教学中的他者形象”计划了三年,目的是使学校进程适应日益增长的文化多样性的条件。然而,在2006年,随着弗拉基米尔·普京总统代表创建了新的历史文化教育标准,历史教育学校制度的改革不再适合创建大欧洲的计划。不过,继续同欧洲联盟合作协调学校教科书的内容。为了防止公众意识日益激进化,在17个参与国中,我国于2020年11月在法国的倡议下成为历史教学观察站的共同组织者,并于2021年10月4日至5日在莫斯科举行了第一届世界学校历史教师大会。对1996年以来俄罗斯联邦和欧洲联盟在学校教育领域所积累的重要合作经验进行的研究表明,只有扩大历史学家之间的合作,通过专家之间的对话,就大欧洲历史上最具争议和最难解决的问题寻求协商一致意见,才有可能制定协调一致的记忆政策。以及政治家希望和平共处与稳定的愿望,发展平等的安全保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
School Textbooks on the National History of Russia and EU Countries in the late XX – early XXI Century as a Dialogue Between Science and Politics
Introduction. One of the priorities in the development of modern historical education in the context of the globalization of the humanities space has become the formation of social practices that make it possible to discuss and coordinate world, national, regional and local content in the content of textbooks on Russian history. When organizing the system of teaching history in schools in Russia and EU countries, the position of the state is still decisive everywhere. The need to form a consensus in the interpretation of the past is caused by the growth of confrontation due to the polarization of public discourse and the growth of international tension. The increased attention of the world community to the politics of memory has intensified the interest of researchers in this topic. Methods. The methodological basis of the work was formed by modern methods of analysis of the historical and cultural heritage of the past. The study was carried out in line with the concepts that substantiate the periodic replacement of the ideals of education and upbringing, depending on the nature of state authorities. When studying the meanings of the ongoing modernization of historical education, the content analysis of media publications was widely used. The principles of historicism, objectivity, and consistency made it possible to fully, deeply and comprehensively consider the object of study in the context of modern development. Discussion and Conclusion. The study has showed that school history education in the early 2020s still remains a conflict field in which the interests of states, interstate associations, public and confessional structures oppose in a variety of manifestations of influence on the formation of the worldview of young people. From 1996 to 2006, the modernization of historical education in Russia took place within the framework of the project “European Dimension in the Study of History”. Since 2007, a new intergovernmental educational project “Image of the Other in History Teaching” has been planned for three years, aimed at adapting the school process to the conditions of growing cultural diversity. However, in 2006, with the creation of a new historical and cultural educational standard on behalf of President Vladimir Putin, the reform of the school system of historical education no longer fit into the program for creating Greater Europe. Nevertheless, cooperation with the European Union in coordinating the content of school textbooks was continued. To prevent the deepening radicalization of public consciousness, our country, among 17 participating states, became a co-organizer of the Observatory for the Teaching of History, created at the initiative of France in November 2020, and on October 4–5, 2021, the First World Congress of School Teachers of History was held in Moscow. A study of the significant experience of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the European Union in the field of school education that has been accumulated since 1996 shows that a coordinated policy of memory is possible only with the expansion of cooperation between historians, a dialogue of specialists in the search for consensus on the most debatable and difficult to resolve issues in the history of Greater Europe, as well as the desire of politicians to peaceful coexistence and stability, the development of guarantees of equal security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信