层级组织中的合作:激励视角

Hideshi Itoh
{"title":"层级组织中的合作:激励视角","authors":"Hideshi Itoh","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A037041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Failures of cooperation\" is one of the six recurring patterns of weakness in productivity performance in the United States pointed out by the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity (Dertouzos et al.). The commission discusses a lack of cooperation at various levels-within firms, between labor and management, in vertical relationships such as producer-consumer and producer-supplier linkages, and among firis in the same industry segment. For example, the commission ascribes the failure of cooperation within the firm to excessive specialization, multiple layers of bureaucracy, and little lateral flow of information. These features are the major ingredients of what was once considered (and has still been considered by many) as the most effective organizational structure: hierarchy based on extensive division of labor. In this structure the production process is divided into many distinct tasks, each of which is made the sole responsibility of a specialist who is only adept at the performance of that task, and coordination among tasks is a specialized job of upper management. The deviation from such an organizational structure seems evident, however. In the field of human resource man-","PeriodicalId":225808,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"213","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooperation in Hierarchical Organizations: An Incentive Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Hideshi Itoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A037041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Failures of cooperation\\\" is one of the six recurring patterns of weakness in productivity performance in the United States pointed out by the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity (Dertouzos et al.). The commission discusses a lack of cooperation at various levels-within firms, between labor and management, in vertical relationships such as producer-consumer and producer-supplier linkages, and among firis in the same industry segment. For example, the commission ascribes the failure of cooperation within the firm to excessive specialization, multiple layers of bureaucracy, and little lateral flow of information. These features are the major ingredients of what was once considered (and has still been considered by many) as the most effective organizational structure: hierarchy based on extensive division of labor. In this structure the production process is divided into many distinct tasks, each of which is made the sole responsibility of a specialist who is only adept at the performance of that task, and coordination among tasks is a specialized job of upper management. The deviation from such an organizational structure seems evident, however. In the field of human resource man-\",\"PeriodicalId\":225808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"213\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A037041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A037041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 213

摘要

“合作失败”是麻省理工学院工业生产力委员会(Dertouzos et al.)指出的美国生产力表现薄弱的六种反复出现的模式之一。委员会讨论了企业内部、劳资之间、垂直关系(如生产者-消费者关系和生产者-供应商关系)以及同一行业部门的企业之间等各个层面缺乏合作的问题。例如,委员会将公司内部合作的失败归咎于过度专业化、多层官僚主义和信息横向流动少。这些特征是曾经被认为(并且仍然被许多人认为)最有效的组织结构的主要成分:基于广泛分工的等级制度。在这种结构中,生产过程被分成许多不同的任务,每一个任务都由一个只擅长完成该任务的专家负责,任务之间的协调是高层管理人员的专门工作。然而,这种组织结构的偏离似乎很明显。在人力资源领域的人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cooperation in Hierarchical Organizations: An Incentive Perspective
"Failures of cooperation" is one of the six recurring patterns of weakness in productivity performance in the United States pointed out by the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity (Dertouzos et al.). The commission discusses a lack of cooperation at various levels-within firms, between labor and management, in vertical relationships such as producer-consumer and producer-supplier linkages, and among firis in the same industry segment. For example, the commission ascribes the failure of cooperation within the firm to excessive specialization, multiple layers of bureaucracy, and little lateral flow of information. These features are the major ingredients of what was once considered (and has still been considered by many) as the most effective organizational structure: hierarchy based on extensive division of labor. In this structure the production process is divided into many distinct tasks, each of which is made the sole responsibility of a specialist who is only adept at the performance of that task, and coordination among tasks is a specialized job of upper management. The deviation from such an organizational structure seems evident, however. In the field of human resource man-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信