{"title":"蓬甸中学学生成绩处理信息系统程序(SISFO PNS)的评价","authors":"Dina Mariana, Aloysius Mering, Indri Astuti","doi":"10.26418/ijli.v1i2.37343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the year of 2012 SISFO PNS, already introduced at SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak, the problem that the writer found were: teachers only open the program at the time of student report will giving to students that made the program will be busy because too many users access it, there is some teacher did not complete the process of filling session but straight to the final score, the programmer is always slow maintenance. From that problem, the writer was aimed at evaluating the implementation of SISFO PNS. The model of evaluation used in this research was CIPP (context, input, process, product). This model was developed by Daniel L. Stufflebeam and friends. The technique of data collection is used observation, interview and documentation. The method of data analysis used descriptive percentage analysis. The results of this research were (1) the evaluation percentage toward context showed that the good result with average of 85.58% (2) the evaluation percentage toward input indicated that the good result with average 73.26% (3) the evaluation percentage toward the process showed that the good result with but it needs to improve with average 67.43% (4) the evaluation percentage toward the product showed that the good result with 79.79%.Keywords: CIPP, Program Evaluation, Students’ Score Analyzing","PeriodicalId":174686,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning and Instruction (IJLI)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evaluation of Students Score Processing Information System Program (SISFO PNS) in SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak\",\"authors\":\"Dina Mariana, Aloysius Mering, Indri Astuti\",\"doi\":\"10.26418/ijli.v1i2.37343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the year of 2012 SISFO PNS, already introduced at SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak, the problem that the writer found were: teachers only open the program at the time of student report will giving to students that made the program will be busy because too many users access it, there is some teacher did not complete the process of filling session but straight to the final score, the programmer is always slow maintenance. From that problem, the writer was aimed at evaluating the implementation of SISFO PNS. The model of evaluation used in this research was CIPP (context, input, process, product). This model was developed by Daniel L. Stufflebeam and friends. The technique of data collection is used observation, interview and documentation. The method of data analysis used descriptive percentage analysis. The results of this research were (1) the evaluation percentage toward context showed that the good result with average of 85.58% (2) the evaluation percentage toward input indicated that the good result with average 73.26% (3) the evaluation percentage toward the process showed that the good result with but it needs to improve with average 67.43% (4) the evaluation percentage toward the product showed that the good result with 79.79%.Keywords: CIPP, Program Evaluation, Students’ Score Analyzing\",\"PeriodicalId\":174686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learning and Instruction (IJLI)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learning and Instruction (IJLI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26418/ijli.v1i2.37343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning and Instruction (IJLI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/ijli.v1i2.37343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在2012年的SISFO PNS,已经在SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak推出,作者发现的问题是:老师只在学生报告的时候打开程序,会给学生,使得程序会很忙,因为太多的用户访问它,有一些老师没有完成填写会话的过程,但直接到最后的分数,程序员总是缓慢的维护。从这个问题出发,作者旨在评价SISFO PNS的实施情况。本研究使用的评价模型为CIPP (context, input, process, product)。这个模型是由Daniel L. Stufflebeam和他的朋友开发的。数据收集采用观察法、访谈法和文献法。数据分析方法采用描述性百分比分析。本研究的结果为:(1)对情境的评价百分比表明效果较好,平均为85.58%;(2)对投入的评价百分比表明效果较好,平均为73.26%;(3)对过程的评价百分比表明效果较好,但仍需改进,平均为67.43%;(4)对产品的评价百分比表明效果较好,平均为79.79%。关键词:CIPP,项目评估,学生成绩分析
The Evaluation of Students Score Processing Information System Program (SISFO PNS) in SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak
In the year of 2012 SISFO PNS, already introduced at SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak, the problem that the writer found were: teachers only open the program at the time of student report will giving to students that made the program will be busy because too many users access it, there is some teacher did not complete the process of filling session but straight to the final score, the programmer is always slow maintenance. From that problem, the writer was aimed at evaluating the implementation of SISFO PNS. The model of evaluation used in this research was CIPP (context, input, process, product). This model was developed by Daniel L. Stufflebeam and friends. The technique of data collection is used observation, interview and documentation. The method of data analysis used descriptive percentage analysis. The results of this research were (1) the evaluation percentage toward context showed that the good result with average of 85.58% (2) the evaluation percentage toward input indicated that the good result with average 73.26% (3) the evaluation percentage toward the process showed that the good result with but it needs to improve with average 67.43% (4) the evaluation percentage toward the product showed that the good result with 79.79%.Keywords: CIPP, Program Evaluation, Students’ Score Analyzing