Lotta Bergman
{"title":"Forskningscirkeln som resurs för utveckling av bibliotekariers läsfrämjande verksamhet","authors":"Lotta Bergman","doi":"10.7146/ntik.v8i1.115602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, changes in the professional role of librarians – in terms of both content and complexity – haveled to an increased need for further education. This need is particularly prominent in reading promotion for groupswhere reading and reading proficiency is decreasing (Sverige. Litteraturutredningen 2010). This article concernstwo “research circles” where librarians reflected on and explored different possibilities for reading promotion.The purpose of this article is to understand how the research circle was used as a resource for knowledge building,and for the changes and development of the librarians’ work with reading promotion in different contexts. Theoverarching theoretical framework is sociocultural (Vygotskij 1978, Bakhtin, 1984; Wertsch 1998). The source ofdata used includes audio-recorded meetings, the reflections I wrote in proximity to the meetings and interviewswith the participants. The results show how the participants became important resources for each other throughthe exchange of experiences and through critical reflection. The investigations challenged the participants’flexibility and ability to cope with uncertainty and to remain open to change. The interviews indicate that therehave been changes in the participants' understanding of reading-promotion and that this kind of supplementaryeducation has the prerequisites to achieve lasting results. The research circle work was linked to a discussionregarding the changed professional role of librarians and the challenge of linking the profession to a wider socialand democracy perspective, where questions about access to language, knowledge, power and democraticinfluence are crucial for the development of librarians’ professional work.","PeriodicalId":246650,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/ntik.v8i1.115602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,图书馆员的职业角色在内容和复杂性方面发生了变化,这导致了对进一步教育的需求增加。这种需求在阅读能力和阅读能力下降的群体的阅读推广中尤为突出。Litteraturutredningen 2010)。本文关注两个“研究圈”,在这两个“研究圈”中,图书馆员对阅读推广的不同可能性进行了反思和探索。本文旨在了解研究圈作为知识建构的资源是如何被利用的,以及在不同的语境下图书馆员的阅读促进工作的变化与发展。最重要的理论框架是社会文化(维果茨基,1978;巴赫金,1984;Wertsch 1998)。所使用的数据来源包括会议录音,我在会议附近写的感想以及对参与者的采访。结果显示参与者如何通过经验交流和批判性反思成为彼此的重要资源。这些调查挑战了参与者应对不确定性和对变化保持开放态度的灵活性和能力。访谈表明,参与者对阅读促进的认识发生了变化,这种补充教育具有取得持久效果的先决条件。研究圈的工作与图书馆员职业角色的变化以及将职业与更广泛的社会和民主观点联系起来的挑战有关,其中关于获取语言、知识、权力和民主影响的问题对图书馆员职业工作的发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forskningscirkeln som resurs för utveckling av bibliotekariers läsfrämjande verksamhet
In recent decades, changes in the professional role of librarians – in terms of both content and complexity – haveled to an increased need for further education. This need is particularly prominent in reading promotion for groupswhere reading and reading proficiency is decreasing (Sverige. Litteraturutredningen 2010). This article concernstwo “research circles” where librarians reflected on and explored different possibilities for reading promotion.The purpose of this article is to understand how the research circle was used as a resource for knowledge building,and for the changes and development of the librarians’ work with reading promotion in different contexts. Theoverarching theoretical framework is sociocultural (Vygotskij 1978, Bakhtin, 1984; Wertsch 1998). The source ofdata used includes audio-recorded meetings, the reflections I wrote in proximity to the meetings and interviewswith the participants. The results show how the participants became important resources for each other throughthe exchange of experiences and through critical reflection. The investigations challenged the participants’flexibility and ability to cope with uncertainty and to remain open to change. The interviews indicate that therehave been changes in the participants' understanding of reading-promotion and that this kind of supplementaryeducation has the prerequisites to achieve lasting results. The research circle work was linked to a discussionregarding the changed professional role of librarians and the challenge of linking the profession to a wider socialand democracy perspective, where questions about access to language, knowledge, power and democraticinfluence are crucial for the development of librarians’ professional work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信