{"title":"运用合作模式、思考、谈话、写作、思维对分享模式及棍子策略对学生学习效果的影响","authors":"Shara Nur Istiqomah","doi":"10.37251/jske.v4i1.420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effect of using the cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the geography learning outcomes of students in class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year (subject matter of inland waters and their potential). \nMethodology: This research is a quasi-experimental research (Quasi Experiment) with Posttest only control design. The population in this study was class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year. The research sample was taken using the Cluster Random Sampling technique with three times taking from the population and obtained class X IPS 4 as the experimental class 1 (defined as the TTW Learning Method with the TS strategy), class X IPS 2 as the experimental class 2 (defined as the TPS Learning Method with the TS strategy ), and class X IPS 5 as the control class (defined as Group Discussion Method). Data collection techniques using tests, documentation and observation. The data analysis technique is parametric inferential statistics with hypothesis testing using one way Anava (one way Anava) and followed by a post Anava test (Scheffe' test) with a significant level of 5%. \nMain Finding: There are differences in geography learning outcomes between the use of the TTW type cooperative learning model and the TS strategy, the TPS type and the TS strategy and group discussions with a mean score ratio of 20.69; 19.39; 18.12 and proven by the one-way anava test with a significant level of 5% obtained Fcount>Ftable (6.22706>3.08). The TTW type of cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than the TPS type with the Talking Stick strategy (19.39). The TTW type cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than group discussions (18.12). TPS type cooperative learning model with TS strategy (19.39) is better than group discussion (18.12). The three learning models have different qualities, the learning model that has the greatest influence is the TTW model with the TS strategy, followed by the TPS model with the TS strategy and group discussions. \nNovelty/Originality of this study: The cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the learning outcomes of students' geography.","PeriodicalId":396525,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Using Cooperative Model Think Talk Write Type and Think Pair Share Type with Talking Stick Strategy on Student Learning Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Shara Nur Istiqomah\",\"doi\":\"10.37251/jske.v4i1.420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effect of using the cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the geography learning outcomes of students in class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year (subject matter of inland waters and their potential). \\nMethodology: This research is a quasi-experimental research (Quasi Experiment) with Posttest only control design. The population in this study was class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year. The research sample was taken using the Cluster Random Sampling technique with three times taking from the population and obtained class X IPS 4 as the experimental class 1 (defined as the TTW Learning Method with the TS strategy), class X IPS 2 as the experimental class 2 (defined as the TPS Learning Method with the TS strategy ), and class X IPS 5 as the control class (defined as Group Discussion Method). Data collection techniques using tests, documentation and observation. The data analysis technique is parametric inferential statistics with hypothesis testing using one way Anava (one way Anava) and followed by a post Anava test (Scheffe' test) with a significant level of 5%. \\nMain Finding: There are differences in geography learning outcomes between the use of the TTW type cooperative learning model and the TS strategy, the TPS type and the TS strategy and group discussions with a mean score ratio of 20.69; 19.39; 18.12 and proven by the one-way anava test with a significant level of 5% obtained Fcount>Ftable (6.22706>3.08). The TTW type of cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than the TPS type with the Talking Stick strategy (19.39). The TTW type cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than group discussions (18.12). TPS type cooperative learning model with TS strategy (19.39) is better than group discussion (18.12). The three learning models have different qualities, the learning model that has the greatest influence is the TTW model with the TS strategy, followed by the TPS model with the TS strategy and group discussions. \\nNovelty/Originality of this study: The cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the learning outcomes of students' geography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":396525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v4i1.420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v4i1.420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的:本研究旨在探讨运用思维-说话-写作型和思维对-分享型合作模式与棍子策略对2016/2017学年班尤多诺X班学生地理学习成果的影响(主题为内陆水域及其潜力)。方法:本研究为准实验研究(Quasi Experiment),采用后测纯对照设计。本研究的人群为2016/2017学年的X级IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono。研究样本采用整群随机抽样技术,从总体中抽取三次样本,得到X IPS 4班为实验1班(定义为TTW学习方法和TS策略),X IPS 2班为实验2班(定义为TPS学习方法和TS策略),X IPS 5班为对照班(定义为小组讨论法)。使用测试、记录和观察的数据收集技术。数据分析技术是参数推理统计,使用单向Anava(单向Anava)进行假设检验,然后进行Anava后检验(Scheffe检验),显著水平为5%。主要发现:TTW型合作学习模式与TS策略、TPS型合作学习模式与TS策略与小组讨论在地理学习效果上存在差异,平均分比为20.69;19.39;18.12,经5%显著水平的单向anava检验证明,得到Fcount>Ftable(6.22706>3.08)。采用TS策略的TTW型合作学习模型(20.69)优于采用Talking Stick策略的TPS型合作学习模型(19.39)。采用TS策略的TTW型合作学习模式(20.69)优于小组讨论模式(18.12)。采用TS策略的TPS型合作学习模式(19.39)优于小组讨论(18.12)。三种学习模式各有不同的品质,其中影响最大的学习模式是采用TS策略的TTW模式,其次是采用TS策略和小组讨论的TPS模式。本研究的新颖性/原创性:思维-说话-写作型、思维对分享型与手杖策略的合作模式对学生地理学习成果的影响。
Effect of Using Cooperative Model Think Talk Write Type and Think Pair Share Type with Talking Stick Strategy on Student Learning Outcomes
Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the effect of using the cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the geography learning outcomes of students in class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year (subject matter of inland waters and their potential).
Methodology: This research is a quasi-experimental research (Quasi Experiment) with Posttest only control design. The population in this study was class X IPS SMA N 1 Banyudono in the 2016/2017 academic year. The research sample was taken using the Cluster Random Sampling technique with three times taking from the population and obtained class X IPS 4 as the experimental class 1 (defined as the TTW Learning Method with the TS strategy), class X IPS 2 as the experimental class 2 (defined as the TPS Learning Method with the TS strategy ), and class X IPS 5 as the control class (defined as Group Discussion Method). Data collection techniques using tests, documentation and observation. The data analysis technique is parametric inferential statistics with hypothesis testing using one way Anava (one way Anava) and followed by a post Anava test (Scheffe' test) with a significant level of 5%.
Main Finding: There are differences in geography learning outcomes between the use of the TTW type cooperative learning model and the TS strategy, the TPS type and the TS strategy and group discussions with a mean score ratio of 20.69; 19.39; 18.12 and proven by the one-way anava test with a significant level of 5% obtained Fcount>Ftable (6.22706>3.08). The TTW type of cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than the TPS type with the Talking Stick strategy (19.39). The TTW type cooperative learning model with the TS strategy (20.69) is better than group discussions (18.12). TPS type cooperative learning model with TS strategy (19.39) is better than group discussion (18.12). The three learning models have different qualities, the learning model that has the greatest influence is the TTW model with the TS strategy, followed by the TPS model with the TS strategy and group discussions.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The cooperative model of the think talk write type and the think pair share type with the talking stick strategy on the learning outcomes of students' geography.