{"title":"更多关于伍德沃德-劳森方法","authors":"R. Elliott","doi":"10.1109/MAP.1988.6086101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an article which appeared in the AP Newsletter last June I argued that the Woodward-Lawson pattern synthesis procedure is inefficient and should disappear from our textbooks. Dr. Steyskal has rebutted (see his letter in the October 1988 issue of the Newsletter) thus changing a dry monologue into a spirited and welcome dialogue, which I would like to continue by making a few counter comments.","PeriodicalId":377321,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More on the Woodward-Lawson method\",\"authors\":\"R. Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MAP.1988.6086101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an article which appeared in the AP Newsletter last June I argued that the Woodward-Lawson pattern synthesis procedure is inefficient and should disappear from our textbooks. Dr. Steyskal has rebutted (see his letter in the October 1988 issue of the Newsletter) thus changing a dry monologue into a spirited and welcome dialogue, which I would like to continue by making a few counter comments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.1988.6086101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.1988.6086101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In an article which appeared in the AP Newsletter last June I argued that the Woodward-Lawson pattern synthesis procedure is inefficient and should disappear from our textbooks. Dr. Steyskal has rebutted (see his letter in the October 1988 issue of the Newsletter) thus changing a dry monologue into a spirited and welcome dialogue, which I would like to continue by making a few counter comments.