边缘计算调度算法的比较

Pedro S. Catali, A. Manacero, R. S. Lobato, R. Spolon, M. A. Cavenaghi
{"title":"边缘计算调度算法的比较","authors":"Pedro S. Catali, A. Manacero, R. S. Lobato, R. Spolon, M. A. Cavenaghi","doi":"10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10211898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through the advancement of the Internet of Things (IoT), the development of devices for task automation, data extraction, and communication between devices has become increasingly easy. But as a result, tens of zettabytes of data are being generated every year, causing excessive bandwidth consumption as well as slow response times for devices. One of the ways to solve the problem is with the use of Edge Computing networks, such paradigm allows the transfer of the data processing to the edges of the network. Since the Edge is mostly composed of devices of varied and limited computational capacity, a good way to distribute the tasks that must be processed is needed. Therefore, efficient, and well tested, scheduling algorithms are a way to distribute tasks in such a way that the time required to perform them is minimized. This work explores the comparison o three distinct scheduling algorithms in Edge Computing: the Modified Monte Carlo Tree Search; the Improved Binary Grey Wolf Optmizer and the Application-aware Scheduling Algorithm, analyzing their speed and efficiency as an evaluation metric, using the iSPD grid simulator.","PeriodicalId":121747,"journal":{"name":"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Edge Computing Scheduling Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Pedro S. Catali, A. Manacero, R. S. Lobato, R. Spolon, M. A. Cavenaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10211898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through the advancement of the Internet of Things (IoT), the development of devices for task automation, data extraction, and communication between devices has become increasingly easy. But as a result, tens of zettabytes of data are being generated every year, causing excessive bandwidth consumption as well as slow response times for devices. One of the ways to solve the problem is with the use of Edge Computing networks, such paradigm allows the transfer of the data processing to the edges of the network. Since the Edge is mostly composed of devices of varied and limited computational capacity, a good way to distribute the tasks that must be processed is needed. Therefore, efficient, and well tested, scheduling algorithms are a way to distribute tasks in such a way that the time required to perform them is minimized. This work explores the comparison o three distinct scheduling algorithms in Edge Computing: the Modified Monte Carlo Tree Search; the Improved Binary Grey Wolf Optmizer and the Application-aware Scheduling Algorithm, analyzing their speed and efficiency as an evaluation metric, using the iSPD grid simulator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10211898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10211898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着物联网(IoT)的发展,用于任务自动化、数据提取和设备间通信的设备的开发变得越来越容易。但其结果是,每年都会产生数十zb的数据,导致带宽消耗过大,设备的响应时间也很慢。解决这个问题的方法之一是使用边缘计算网络,这种范式允许将数据处理传输到网络的边缘。由于Edge主要由各种计算能力有限的设备组成,因此需要一种分配必须处理的任务的好方法。因此,高效且经过良好测试的调度算法是一种分配任务的方法,可以使执行任务所需的时间最小化。这项工作探讨了边缘计算中三种不同调度算法的比较:改进的蒙特卡罗树搜索;利用iSPD网格模拟器,分析了改进的二进制灰狼优化器和应用感知调度算法的速度和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Edge Computing Scheduling Algorithms
Through the advancement of the Internet of Things (IoT), the development of devices for task automation, data extraction, and communication between devices has become increasingly easy. But as a result, tens of zettabytes of data are being generated every year, causing excessive bandwidth consumption as well as slow response times for devices. One of the ways to solve the problem is with the use of Edge Computing networks, such paradigm allows the transfer of the data processing to the edges of the network. Since the Edge is mostly composed of devices of varied and limited computational capacity, a good way to distribute the tasks that must be processed is needed. Therefore, efficient, and well tested, scheduling algorithms are a way to distribute tasks in such a way that the time required to perform them is minimized. This work explores the comparison o three distinct scheduling algorithms in Edge Computing: the Modified Monte Carlo Tree Search; the Improved Binary Grey Wolf Optmizer and the Application-aware Scheduling Algorithm, analyzing their speed and efficiency as an evaluation metric, using the iSPD grid simulator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信