Heliodor Muszyński
{"title":"Socjalizacja i wychowanie. W poszukiwaniu genezy wychowania (perspektywa ewolucyjna)","authors":"Heliodor Muszyński","doi":"10.14746/kse.2022.22.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author deals with the problem of differences in meaning between the concepts of socialization and education. In social sciences, and especially in educational sciences, there is no agreement as to the relationship between the scopes of these two fundamental concepts. The article attempts to overcome these semantic difficulties by adopting an evolutionary perspective in line with the assumption that education emerged as a specific type of socialization in human prehistory. The search of its essential properties (and thus differences), was guided by the cognitive directive of Aristotle, according to which “the best understanding of things is achieved by those who study them at their inception”. The article uses the method of data analysis established in numerous studies on social and cultural human development, starting from the earliest stages of life in primitive groups. Socialization appeared in these groups as a way of transmitting collective experience, and thus culture, necessary for their survival. The continuation of the analysis leads to investigating what factors made this culturation take a different form, namely that of education. As it turns out, this difference is difficult to discern in the intentionality of cultural influences. It appears only when the group becomes aware of the need to adapt adolescents to fulfill various social roles. This already requires going beyond socialization, which is always a spontaneous process including widespread participation of group members in the transmission of an experience that is also common. In order to provide selected group members with selected elements of the experience linked to their social role, the group must appoint competent members for the transfer of the experience selected to perform specific social roles. These activities constitute one more role distinguished in the group – the role of the educator. And the activities that make up their performance are education.","PeriodicalId":397056,"journal":{"name":"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/kse.2022.22.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了社会化与教育这两个概念的意义差异问题。在社会科学中,特别是在教育科学中,对于这两个基本概念的范围之间的关系并没有达成一致。本文试图通过采用进化论的观点来克服这些语义上的困难,这一观点与教育作为人类史前社会的一种特定类型的社会化的假设相一致。对其本质属性(以及因此而产生的差异)的探索,是在亚里士多德的认知指导下进行的,根据这一指导,“对事物的最佳理解是由那些从一开始就研究它们的人实现的”。本文采用了大量关于人类社会和文化发展的研究中建立的数据分析方法,从原始群体生命的最早阶段开始。在这些群体中,社会化是作为一种传递集体经验的方式出现的,因此也是传递他们生存所必需的文化的方式。分析的继续导致调查是什么因素使这种文化采取不同的形式,即教育。事实证明,这种差异很难在文化影响的意向性中辨别出来。只有当群体意识到需要让青少年适应各种社会角色时,才会出现这种情况。这已经要求超越社会化,社会化始终是一个自发的过程,包括群体成员广泛参与传播同样普遍的经验。为了向选定的小组成员提供与其社会角色相关的选定经验要素,小组必须任命有能力的成员,将选定的经验转移到执行特定的社会角色。这些活动构成了群体中另一个与众不同的角色——教育者的角色。而构成他们表现的活动是教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socjalizacja i wychowanie. W poszukiwaniu genezy wychowania (perspektywa ewolucyjna)
The author deals with the problem of differences in meaning between the concepts of socialization and education. In social sciences, and especially in educational sciences, there is no agreement as to the relationship between the scopes of these two fundamental concepts. The article attempts to overcome these semantic difficulties by adopting an evolutionary perspective in line with the assumption that education emerged as a specific type of socialization in human prehistory. The search of its essential properties (and thus differences), was guided by the cognitive directive of Aristotle, according to which “the best understanding of things is achieved by those who study them at their inception”. The article uses the method of data analysis established in numerous studies on social and cultural human development, starting from the earliest stages of life in primitive groups. Socialization appeared in these groups as a way of transmitting collective experience, and thus culture, necessary for their survival. The continuation of the analysis leads to investigating what factors made this culturation take a different form, namely that of education. As it turns out, this difference is difficult to discern in the intentionality of cultural influences. It appears only when the group becomes aware of the need to adapt adolescents to fulfill various social roles. This already requires going beyond socialization, which is always a spontaneous process including widespread participation of group members in the transmission of an experience that is also common. In order to provide selected group members with selected elements of the experience linked to their social role, the group must appoint competent members for the transfer of the experience selected to perform specific social roles. These activities constitute one more role distinguished in the group – the role of the educator. And the activities that make up their performance are education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信