尼日利亚传统稻农与改良稻农技术效率的比较分析

F. Ogundele, V. Okoruwa
{"title":"尼日利亚传统稻农与改良稻农技术效率的比较分析","authors":"F. Ogundele, V. Okoruwa","doi":"10.4314/AJEP.V11I1.24261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined technical efficiency differentials between farmers planning traditional rice varieties and those planning improved varieties in Nigeria. The study employed a multistage random sampling procedure for the selection of 302 respondents across four major rice producing states in the country. The main analytical technique used was estimation of technical efficiency following Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) Procedure available in Frontier 4.1. Results that emanated from these analyses showed that significant increase recorded in output of rice in the country could be traced mainly to area expansion. Other variables that tended to contribute to technical efficiency were; hired labour, herbicides and seeds. The estimated average technical efficiencies for the two groups were correspondingly high (>0.90). Further analysis showed that farmers in both categories were operating at a point of increasing return to scale. The test of hypothesis on the differentials in technical efficiency between the two groups of farmers showed that there was no absolute differential in technical efficiency between them. African Journal of Economic Policy Vol. 11(1) 2004: 91-108","PeriodicalId":162902,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Economic Policy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of technical efficiency between traditional and improved rice variety farmers in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"F. Ogundele, V. Okoruwa\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/AJEP.V11I1.24261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined technical efficiency differentials between farmers planning traditional rice varieties and those planning improved varieties in Nigeria. The study employed a multistage random sampling procedure for the selection of 302 respondents across four major rice producing states in the country. The main analytical technique used was estimation of technical efficiency following Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) Procedure available in Frontier 4.1. Results that emanated from these analyses showed that significant increase recorded in output of rice in the country could be traced mainly to area expansion. Other variables that tended to contribute to technical efficiency were; hired labour, herbicides and seeds. The estimated average technical efficiencies for the two groups were correspondingly high (>0.90). Further analysis showed that farmers in both categories were operating at a point of increasing return to scale. The test of hypothesis on the differentials in technical efficiency between the two groups of farmers showed that there was no absolute differential in technical efficiency between them. African Journal of Economic Policy Vol. 11(1) 2004: 91-108\",\"PeriodicalId\":162902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Economic Policy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Economic Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJEP.V11I1.24261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJEP.V11I1.24261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

这项研究考察了尼日利亚规划传统水稻品种和规划改良水稻品种的农民之间的技术效率差异。该研究采用了多阶段随机抽样程序,在该国四个主要水稻生产邦选择了302名受访者。使用的主要分析技术是根据Frontier 4.1中提供的最大似然估计(MLE)程序估计技术效率。从这些分析得出的结果表明,该国水稻产量的显著增加主要归因于面积的扩大。其他有助于提高技术效率的变量有;雇工、除草剂和种子。估计两组的平均技术效率相应较高(>0.90)。进一步的分析表明,这两类农民的经营都处于规模回报增加的点上。对两组农民技术效率差异的假设检验表明,两组农民之间的技术效率不存在绝对差异。中国经济研究,Vol. 11(1), 2004: 91-108
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of technical efficiency between traditional and improved rice variety farmers in Nigeria
This study examined technical efficiency differentials between farmers planning traditional rice varieties and those planning improved varieties in Nigeria. The study employed a multistage random sampling procedure for the selection of 302 respondents across four major rice producing states in the country. The main analytical technique used was estimation of technical efficiency following Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) Procedure available in Frontier 4.1. Results that emanated from these analyses showed that significant increase recorded in output of rice in the country could be traced mainly to area expansion. Other variables that tended to contribute to technical efficiency were; hired labour, herbicides and seeds. The estimated average technical efficiencies for the two groups were correspondingly high (>0.90). Further analysis showed that farmers in both categories were operating at a point of increasing return to scale. The test of hypothesis on the differentials in technical efficiency between the two groups of farmers showed that there was no absolute differential in technical efficiency between them. African Journal of Economic Policy Vol. 11(1) 2004: 91-108
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信