外科抗菌预防:三级护理教学医院外科医生对指南的了解和遵守情况

F. Khan, Bhanu Chaudhary, A. Sultan, Y. Alvi, Manzoor Ahmad, Pushkar Kumar, M. Shah, Haris Khan
{"title":"外科抗菌预防:三级护理教学医院外科医生对指南的了解和遵守情况","authors":"F. Khan, Bhanu Chaudhary, A. Sultan, Y. Alvi, Manzoor Ahmad, Pushkar Kumar, M. Shah, Haris Khan","doi":"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_36_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is considered vital for reducing surgical site infection, however, if inappropriate, it prolongs the hospital stay of patients, increases morbidity, promotes antimicrobial resistance and puts an economic burden on the health system. This study was carried out to assess the knowledge and compliance of SAP among surgeons in a hospital. Methods: A quantitative, non-interventional study was done among surgeons from a tertiary teaching hospital. First, we evaluated participant knowledge from different surgical specialities by the pre-designed questionnaire, and second, we audited surgeries during the study period of 3 months for a compliance rate of SAP. The score of responses and compliance to SAP variables during surgeries was studied. Results: We assessed a total of 184 participants for knowledge and 271 surgeries were audited. Among the variables of surgical prophylaxis, majority of the participants answered correctly about the route and timing of administration of SAP in 179 (97.3%) and 145 (78.8%) respectively. Only 66 (35.9%) knew about the correct choice of SAP while 78 (42.4%) responded correctly about the duration within which it should be stopped. However, two-third 138 (75%) were aware of the assessment of beta-lactam allergy before administration. Among the surgeries audited, 83.7% compliance was noted for the timing of administration of antibiotics, however, in only 42 (26.7%) cases SAP was stopped within 24 h of surgery and in only 38 (24.2%) cases cefazolin/cefuroxime was given as prophylaxis. Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of knowledge and awareness of SAP guidelines among surgeons. There is a need to train surgeons regarding this important issue.","PeriodicalId":310565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Knowledge and compliance of guidelines among surgeons in a tertiary care teaching hospital\",\"authors\":\"F. Khan, Bhanu Chaudhary, A. Sultan, Y. Alvi, Manzoor Ahmad, Pushkar Kumar, M. Shah, Haris Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_36_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is considered vital for reducing surgical site infection, however, if inappropriate, it prolongs the hospital stay of patients, increases morbidity, promotes antimicrobial resistance and puts an economic burden on the health system. This study was carried out to assess the knowledge and compliance of SAP among surgeons in a hospital. Methods: A quantitative, non-interventional study was done among surgeons from a tertiary teaching hospital. First, we evaluated participant knowledge from different surgical specialities by the pre-designed questionnaire, and second, we audited surgeries during the study period of 3 months for a compliance rate of SAP. The score of responses and compliance to SAP variables during surgeries was studied. Results: We assessed a total of 184 participants for knowledge and 271 surgeries were audited. Among the variables of surgical prophylaxis, majority of the participants answered correctly about the route and timing of administration of SAP in 179 (97.3%) and 145 (78.8%) respectively. Only 66 (35.9%) knew about the correct choice of SAP while 78 (42.4%) responded correctly about the duration within which it should be stopped. However, two-third 138 (75%) were aware of the assessment of beta-lactam allergy before administration. Among the surgeries audited, 83.7% compliance was noted for the timing of administration of antibiotics, however, in only 42 (26.7%) cases SAP was stopped within 24 h of surgery and in only 38 (24.2%) cases cefazolin/cefuroxime was given as prophylaxis. Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of knowledge and awareness of SAP guidelines among surgeons. There is a need to train surgeons regarding this important issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_36_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_36_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:外科抗菌素预防(SAP)被认为对减少手术部位感染至关重要,然而,如果不适当,它会延长患者的住院时间,增加发病率,促进抗菌素耐药性并给卫生系统带来经济负担。本研究旨在评估某医院外科医生对SAP的了解程度及依从性。方法:对某三级教学医院外科医生进行定量、非介入性研究。首先,我们通过预先设计的问卷来评估来自不同外科专业的参与者的知识,其次,我们在3个月的研究期间对手术进行审计,以了解SAP的依从率。研究手术过程中对SAP变量的响应得分和依从性。结果:我们共评估了184名参与者的知识,并审核了271例手术。在手术预防的变量中,179例(97.3%)和145例(78.8%)对SAP给药途径和给药时间回答正确。只有66人(35.9%)知道SAP的正确选择,而78人(42.4%)正确回答了应该停止SAP的持续时间。然而,三分之二(75%)的患者在给药前了解β -内酰胺过敏评估。在被审计的手术中,83.7%的患者在给药时间上符合要求,但只有42例(26.7%)患者在手术后24小时内停用SAP,只有38例(24.2%)患者使用头孢唑林/头孢呋辛作为预防用药。结论:本研究强调了外科医生SAP指南知识和意识的重要性。有必要就这个重要问题对外科医生进行培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: Knowledge and compliance of guidelines among surgeons in a tertiary care teaching hospital
Introduction: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is considered vital for reducing surgical site infection, however, if inappropriate, it prolongs the hospital stay of patients, increases morbidity, promotes antimicrobial resistance and puts an economic burden on the health system. This study was carried out to assess the knowledge and compliance of SAP among surgeons in a hospital. Methods: A quantitative, non-interventional study was done among surgeons from a tertiary teaching hospital. First, we evaluated participant knowledge from different surgical specialities by the pre-designed questionnaire, and second, we audited surgeries during the study period of 3 months for a compliance rate of SAP. The score of responses and compliance to SAP variables during surgeries was studied. Results: We assessed a total of 184 participants for knowledge and 271 surgeries were audited. Among the variables of surgical prophylaxis, majority of the participants answered correctly about the route and timing of administration of SAP in 179 (97.3%) and 145 (78.8%) respectively. Only 66 (35.9%) knew about the correct choice of SAP while 78 (42.4%) responded correctly about the duration within which it should be stopped. However, two-third 138 (75%) were aware of the assessment of beta-lactam allergy before administration. Among the surgeries audited, 83.7% compliance was noted for the timing of administration of antibiotics, however, in only 42 (26.7%) cases SAP was stopped within 24 h of surgery and in only 38 (24.2%) cases cefazolin/cefuroxime was given as prophylaxis. Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of knowledge and awareness of SAP guidelines among surgeons. There is a need to train surgeons regarding this important issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信