质疑东盟政治安全共同体在南海冲突中的存在

Renaldo Benarrivo, Teguh Puja Pramadya
{"title":"质疑东盟政治安全共同体在南海冲突中的存在","authors":"Renaldo Benarrivo, Teguh Puja Pramadya","doi":"10.34010/gpsjournal.v4i2.5875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South China sea conflicts continue to escalate and increase the significance of the countries in Southeast Asia. This potentially have an impact on the stability of regional security systemically. Asean Political Security Community (APSC) as an important part of regional governance certainly needs to take a role. However, ASEAN member countries tend to still use their own methods, and have not optimally used the APSC as a means to increasing their bargaining position over the ongoing conflict. The use of the constructivism approach in this paper will try to explore how APSC should be able to play a more operational role and positioning itself as the only security community in the region. Qualitative research methods are used to interpret any phenomena that occur related to the involvement of Southeast Asian countries in the South China Sea conflict. This paper questioning the existence ofAPSC with its formality in responding various kinds of issues and the latest security dynamics in Southeast Asia, especially the South China Sea Conflict. The underlying causes for APSC's nongrounded policy direction will be part of the conclusion of this paper.","PeriodicalId":164254,"journal":{"name":"Global Political Studies Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning The Existence Of Asean Political Security Community In South China Sea Conflict\",\"authors\":\"Renaldo Benarrivo, Teguh Puja Pramadya\",\"doi\":\"10.34010/gpsjournal.v4i2.5875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South China sea conflicts continue to escalate and increase the significance of the countries in Southeast Asia. This potentially have an impact on the stability of regional security systemically. Asean Political Security Community (APSC) as an important part of regional governance certainly needs to take a role. However, ASEAN member countries tend to still use their own methods, and have not optimally used the APSC as a means to increasing their bargaining position over the ongoing conflict. The use of the constructivism approach in this paper will try to explore how APSC should be able to play a more operational role and positioning itself as the only security community in the region. Qualitative research methods are used to interpret any phenomena that occur related to the involvement of Southeast Asian countries in the South China Sea conflict. This paper questioning the existence ofAPSC with its formality in responding various kinds of issues and the latest security dynamics in Southeast Asia, especially the South China Sea Conflict. The underlying causes for APSC's nongrounded policy direction will be part of the conclusion of this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Political Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Political Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34010/gpsjournal.v4i2.5875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Political Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34010/gpsjournal.v4i2.5875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南海冲突不断升级,增加了东南亚国家的重要性。这可能对地区安全的稳定产生系统性的影响。东盟政治安全共同体作为地区治理的重要组成部分,当然需要发挥作用。然而,东盟成员国仍然倾向于使用自己的方法,并没有最佳地利用亚太安全委员会作为一种手段,以增加他们在持续冲突中的讨价还价地位。本文将运用建构主义方法,探讨亚太安全共同体如何发挥更大的操作性作用,并将自身定位为该地区唯一的安全共同体。本文采用定性研究方法来解释与东南亚国家卷入南海冲突有关的任何现象。本文对亚太安全合作机制的存在及其应对各种问题的形式和东南亚地区特别是南海冲突的最新安全动态提出了质疑。导致亚太经合组织政策导向不合理的深层原因将成为本文结论的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questioning The Existence Of Asean Political Security Community In South China Sea Conflict
South China sea conflicts continue to escalate and increase the significance of the countries in Southeast Asia. This potentially have an impact on the stability of regional security systemically. Asean Political Security Community (APSC) as an important part of regional governance certainly needs to take a role. However, ASEAN member countries tend to still use their own methods, and have not optimally used the APSC as a means to increasing their bargaining position over the ongoing conflict. The use of the constructivism approach in this paper will try to explore how APSC should be able to play a more operational role and positioning itself as the only security community in the region. Qualitative research methods are used to interpret any phenomena that occur related to the involvement of Southeast Asian countries in the South China Sea conflict. This paper questioning the existence ofAPSC with its formality in responding various kinds of issues and the latest security dynamics in Southeast Asia, especially the South China Sea Conflict. The underlying causes for APSC's nongrounded policy direction will be part of the conclusion of this paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信