第三部分简介

Ryan Walter
{"title":"第三部分简介","authors":"Ryan Walter","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197603055.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Introduction indicates the aim of the next three chapters: to study the doctrinal contest between Malthus and Ricardo in historical terms. This is a challenge since the temptation is to treat the articulation of correct doctrine as the natural form for economic knowledge. Yet it is crucial to note that doctrinal elaboration was pioneered by Malthus and Ricardo, such that this development needs to be registered as a historical event. This is achieved by studying doctrinal claims alongside the appraisive vocabularies that Malthus and Ricardo used, which reveals that the vocabulary of theory and practice was once again at the centre of the contest. In particular, Malthus used this vocabulary to impugn Ricardo’s reasoning as dangerous because it neglected the needs of legislators and because it seemed to be the product of an undisciplined mind.","PeriodicalId":254139,"journal":{"name":"Before Method and Models","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Part III\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197603055.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Introduction indicates the aim of the next three chapters: to study the doctrinal contest between Malthus and Ricardo in historical terms. This is a challenge since the temptation is to treat the articulation of correct doctrine as the natural form for economic knowledge. Yet it is crucial to note that doctrinal elaboration was pioneered by Malthus and Ricardo, such that this development needs to be registered as a historical event. This is achieved by studying doctrinal claims alongside the appraisive vocabularies that Malthus and Ricardo used, which reveals that the vocabulary of theory and practice was once again at the centre of the contest. In particular, Malthus used this vocabulary to impugn Ricardo’s reasoning as dangerous because it neglected the needs of legislators and because it seemed to be the product of an undisciplined mind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Before Method and Models\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Before Method and Models\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197603055.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Before Method and Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197603055.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇导言表明了接下来三章的目的:从历史的角度研究马尔萨斯和李嘉图之间的理论竞争。这是一个挑战,因为人们倾向于将正确学说的表述视为经济知识的自然形式。然而,重要的是要注意,理论阐述是由马尔萨斯和李嘉图开创的,因此,这一发展需要被视为一个历史事件。这是通过研究理论主张和马尔萨斯和李嘉图使用的评价词汇来实现的,这表明理论和实践的词汇再次处于竞争的中心。特别是,马尔萨斯用这些词汇来抨击李嘉图的推理是危险的,因为它忽视了立法者的需要,因为它似乎是一个无纪律的头脑的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to Part III
This Introduction indicates the aim of the next three chapters: to study the doctrinal contest between Malthus and Ricardo in historical terms. This is a challenge since the temptation is to treat the articulation of correct doctrine as the natural form for economic knowledge. Yet it is crucial to note that doctrinal elaboration was pioneered by Malthus and Ricardo, such that this development needs to be registered as a historical event. This is achieved by studying doctrinal claims alongside the appraisive vocabularies that Malthus and Ricardo used, which reveals that the vocabulary of theory and practice was once again at the centre of the contest. In particular, Malthus used this vocabulary to impugn Ricardo’s reasoning as dangerous because it neglected the needs of legislators and because it seemed to be the product of an undisciplined mind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信