红外线与电神经刺激的比较

A.P. Keef
{"title":"红外线与电神经刺激的比较","authors":"A.P. Keef","doi":"10.1109/EMBSW.2007.4454187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrical stimulation is the standard technique for peripheral nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation and deep brain stimulation as a treatment for chronic pain. However, recent research has shown the feasibility of stimulating a nerve with pulsed infrared laser beams. This alternative excitation method could become a practical form of neural stimulation but currently it is not without limitations. One limitation is caused by the thermal effects of the excited tissue and the other limitation is due to its low efficiency in energy delivery for stimulation. Electrical stimulation does not exhibit these limitations. This paper is intended to provide an informative comparison between electrical stimulation and pulsed infrared stimulation with an emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of each.","PeriodicalId":333843,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Dallas Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Infrared and Electrical Nerve Stimualtion\",\"authors\":\"A.P. Keef\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMBSW.2007.4454187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electrical stimulation is the standard technique for peripheral nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation and deep brain stimulation as a treatment for chronic pain. However, recent research has shown the feasibility of stimulating a nerve with pulsed infrared laser beams. This alternative excitation method could become a practical form of neural stimulation but currently it is not without limitations. One limitation is caused by the thermal effects of the excited tissue and the other limitation is due to its low efficiency in energy delivery for stimulation. Electrical stimulation does not exhibit these limitations. This paper is intended to provide an informative comparison between electrical stimulation and pulsed infrared stimulation with an emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of each.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE Dallas Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE Dallas Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBSW.2007.4454187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Dallas Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBSW.2007.4454187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

电刺激是外周神经刺激、脊髓刺激和脑深部刺激治疗慢性疼痛的标准技术。然而,最近的研究表明,用脉冲红外激光束刺激神经是可行的。这种替代的激励方法可能成为一种实用的神经刺激形式,但目前它并非没有局限性。一个限制是由受激组织的热效应引起的,另一个限制是由于其低效率的能量传递刺激。电刺激没有这些限制。本文旨在提供电刺激和脉冲红外刺激之间的信息比较,重点是各自的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Infrared and Electrical Nerve Stimualtion
Electrical stimulation is the standard technique for peripheral nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation and deep brain stimulation as a treatment for chronic pain. However, recent research has shown the feasibility of stimulating a nerve with pulsed infrared laser beams. This alternative excitation method could become a practical form of neural stimulation but currently it is not without limitations. One limitation is caused by the thermal effects of the excited tissue and the other limitation is due to its low efficiency in energy delivery for stimulation. Electrical stimulation does not exhibit these limitations. This paper is intended to provide an informative comparison between electrical stimulation and pulsed infrared stimulation with an emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of each.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信