宽带电视网络中多播与单播的决策支持

Alireza Abdollahpouri, B. Wolfinger
{"title":"宽带电视网络中多播与单播的决策支持","authors":"Alireza Abdollahpouri, B. Wolfinger","doi":"10.1109/AICT.2010.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) is undoubtedly a killer application and when offered via wireless networks, it paves the way for quad-play in next generation networks. It has been argued for a long time that the popularity of TV channels can be modeled quite realistically using a Zipf-like distribution in which the top 10% of channels account for nearly 90% of viewers. Therefore, most channels are unpopular or rarely watched and it is not efficient to multicast a channel as long as there are less than a given number of viewers tuned into it. The interesting question arises at which bound multicast and unicast channels should be separated. In this article, we want to first introduce a performance criterion, called multicast gain, which can be used for computing multicast efficiency. Based on the measured gain, we define a threshold in order to identify cases in which unicasting might be a better choice. We show that although multicasting can usually outperform multiple unicasting in terms of bandwidth usage, due to the inherent overhead in establishing and maintaining multicast connections, in special cases, using multiple unicast flows can be preferable.","PeriodicalId":339151,"journal":{"name":"2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications","volume":"218 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Support for the Usage of Multicast versus Unicast in Broadband TV Networks\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Abdollahpouri, B. Wolfinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AICT.2010.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) is undoubtedly a killer application and when offered via wireless networks, it paves the way for quad-play in next generation networks. It has been argued for a long time that the popularity of TV channels can be modeled quite realistically using a Zipf-like distribution in which the top 10% of channels account for nearly 90% of viewers. Therefore, most channels are unpopular or rarely watched and it is not efficient to multicast a channel as long as there are less than a given number of viewers tuned into it. The interesting question arises at which bound multicast and unicast channels should be separated. In this article, we want to first introduce a performance criterion, called multicast gain, which can be used for computing multicast efficiency. Based on the measured gain, we define a threshold in order to identify cases in which unicasting might be a better choice. We show that although multicasting can usually outperform multiple unicasting in terms of bandwidth usage, due to the inherent overhead in establishing and maintaining multicast connections, in special cases, using multiple unicast flows can be preferable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications\",\"volume\":\"218 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT.2010.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT.2010.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

互联网协议电视(IPTV)无疑是一个杀手级应用程序,当它通过无线网络提供时,它为下一代网络的四人播放铺平了道路。长期以来,人们一直认为,电视频道的受欢迎程度可以用类似zipf的分布来相当现实地建模,其中前10%的频道占近90%的观众。因此,大多数频道都不受欢迎或很少有人观看,只要收看该频道的观众少于给定数量,多播频道的效率就会降低。一个有趣的问题出现了,绑定的多播和单播信道应该被分开。在本文中,我们想首先介绍一个性能标准,称为组播增益,它可以用于计算组播效率。基于测量到的增益,我们定义了一个阈值,以便识别单播可能是更好选择的情况。我们表明,尽管在带宽使用方面,由于建立和维护多播连接的固有开销,多播通常优于多个单播,但在特殊情况下,使用多个单播流可能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision Support for the Usage of Multicast versus Unicast in Broadband TV Networks
Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) is undoubtedly a killer application and when offered via wireless networks, it paves the way for quad-play in next generation networks. It has been argued for a long time that the popularity of TV channels can be modeled quite realistically using a Zipf-like distribution in which the top 10% of channels account for nearly 90% of viewers. Therefore, most channels are unpopular or rarely watched and it is not efficient to multicast a channel as long as there are less than a given number of viewers tuned into it. The interesting question arises at which bound multicast and unicast channels should be separated. In this article, we want to first introduce a performance criterion, called multicast gain, which can be used for computing multicast efficiency. Based on the measured gain, we define a threshold in order to identify cases in which unicasting might be a better choice. We show that although multicasting can usually outperform multiple unicasting in terms of bandwidth usage, due to the inherent overhead in establishing and maintaining multicast connections, in special cases, using multiple unicast flows can be preferable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信