美国早期众议院的政党制度与立法凝聚力

F. Thames
{"title":"美国早期众议院的政党制度与立法凝聚力","authors":"F. Thames","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2400558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does variation in the party system explain variation in legislator cohesion? Exiting theory on the forces that drive legislative cohesion argues, in part, that legislators follow the party line in order to aid their reelection chances. If true, then variation in the competitiveness and institutionalization of the party should lead to variation in legislator cohesion. Using data from the U.S. House of Representatives during the \"First Party Systems,\" I show that U.S. House members differed in the levels of cohesion based on differences in the party system across their districts.","PeriodicalId":125020,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Party System and Legislative Cohesion in the Early U.S. House of Representatives\",\"authors\":\"F. Thames\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2400558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Does variation in the party system explain variation in legislator cohesion? Exiting theory on the forces that drive legislative cohesion argues, in part, that legislators follow the party line in order to aid their reelection chances. If true, then variation in the competitiveness and institutionalization of the party should lead to variation in legislator cohesion. Using data from the U.S. House of Representatives during the \\\"First Party Systems,\\\" I show that U.S. House members differed in the levels of cohesion based on differences in the party system across their districts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2400558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2400558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政党制度的变化能否解释立法者凝聚力的变化?现有的关于推动立法凝聚力的力量的理论认为,在某种程度上,立法者遵循政党路线是为了增加他们连任的机会。如果这是真的,那么党的竞争力和制度化的变化应该导致立法者凝聚力的变化。我使用“第一党制度”期间美国众议院的数据,表明美国众议院议员的凝聚力水平不同,这是基于他们所在地区政党制度的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Party System and Legislative Cohesion in the Early U.S. House of Representatives
Does variation in the party system explain variation in legislator cohesion? Exiting theory on the forces that drive legislative cohesion argues, in part, that legislators follow the party line in order to aid their reelection chances. If true, then variation in the competitiveness and institutionalization of the party should lead to variation in legislator cohesion. Using data from the U.S. House of Representatives during the "First Party Systems," I show that U.S. House members differed in the levels of cohesion based on differences in the party system across their districts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信