«性别as a useful category吗?»,状况geschichtsdidaktischen思考和实证研究

Monika Waldis
{"title":"«性别as a useful category吗?»,状况geschichtsdidaktischen思考和实证研究","authors":"Monika Waldis","doi":"10.33055/didacticahistorica.2022.008.01.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article inquiries into the state of history didactic theory building and reflection on the category «gender». While newer feminist discourse and queer theory play a role in academic reference disciplines, current curricula and history textbooks still tend to be oriented towards the approach of women’s and gender history. Reflections on history didactics call for a normatively open discussion of gender-related identities. In contrast, empirical findings point to the need to promote critical, reflective gender awareness.","PeriodicalId":354218,"journal":{"name":"Didactica Historica","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"«Gender as a useful category?» – Zum Stand der geschichtsdidaktischen Reflexion und empirischen Forschung\",\"authors\":\"Monika Waldis\",\"doi\":\"10.33055/didacticahistorica.2022.008.01.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article inquiries into the state of history didactic theory building and reflection on the category «gender». While newer feminist discourse and queer theory play a role in academic reference disciplines, current curricula and history textbooks still tend to be oriented towards the approach of women’s and gender history. Reflections on history didactics call for a normatively open discussion of gender-related identities. In contrast, empirical findings point to the need to promote critical, reflective gender awareness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Didactica Historica\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Didactica Historica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33055/didacticahistorica.2022.008.01.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Didactica Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33055/didacticahistorica.2022.008.01.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了历史教学理论建构的现状和对“性别”范畴的反思。虽然新的女权主义话语和酷儿理论在学术参考学科中发挥了作用,但目前的课程和历史教科书仍然倾向于以女性和性别史的方法为导向。对历史教学的反思要求对与性别相关的身份进行规范的公开讨论。相反,经验性研究结果指出,需要促进批判性的、反思性的性别意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
«Gender as a useful category?» – Zum Stand der geschichtsdidaktischen Reflexion und empirischen Forschung
The article inquiries into the state of history didactic theory building and reflection on the category «gender». While newer feminist discourse and queer theory play a role in academic reference disciplines, current curricula and history textbooks still tend to be oriented towards the approach of women’s and gender history. Reflections on history didactics call for a normatively open discussion of gender-related identities. In contrast, empirical findings point to the need to promote critical, reflective gender awareness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信