用设计平息“网络争论”

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI Pub Date : 2019-07-18 DOI:10.29173/CAIS1066

Alamir Novin

{"title":"用设计平息“网络争论”","authors":"Alamir Novin","doi":"10.29173/CAIS1066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Internet arguments\" are refer to users exchanging heated comments online. However, argumentation can also be beneficial for exchanging ideas on a topic with conflicting information. This is the situation with what Horst Rittel refers to as “wicked problem,” whereby solutions to problems are complex due toconflicting information. To assist discourse surrounding wicked problems, scholars created Computer Supported Argument Visualizations (CSAV). This exploratory pilot gathered user insight on when people prefer argumentation tools by asking participants to debate the complexities of Climate Change online. The results in this pilot study suggests that CSAVs for more formal argumentation might assist science journalism students with developing more informed opinions on the subject of Climate Change.","PeriodicalId":102465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calming \\\"Internet Arguments\\\" with Design\",\"authors\":\"Alamir Novin\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/CAIS1066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Internet arguments\\\" are refer to users exchanging heated comments online. However, argumentation can also be beneficial for exchanging ideas on a topic with conflicting information. This is the situation with what Horst Rittel refers to as “wicked problem,” whereby solutions to problems are complex due toconflicting information. To assist discourse surrounding wicked problems, scholars created Computer Supported Argument Visualizations (CSAV). This exploratory pilot gathered user insight on when people prefer argumentation tools by asking participants to debate the complexities of Climate Change online. The results in this pilot study suggests that CSAVs for more formal argumentation might assist science journalism students with developing more informed opinions on the subject of Climate Change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/CAIS1066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/CAIS1066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

“网络争论”指的是用户在网上激烈的评论。然而，辩论也有利于就一个信息冲突的话题交换意见。这就是霍斯特·里特尔所说的“邪恶问题”的情况，即问题的解决方案由于相互冲突的信息而变得复杂。为了帮助围绕邪恶问题的讨论，学者们创建了计算机支持的论点可视化(CSAV)。这个探索性试点项目通过要求参与者在线辩论气候变化的复杂性，收集了用户对人们何时更喜欢辩论工具的见解。这项试点研究的结果表明，用于更正式论证的csav可能有助于科学新闻系学生在气候变化问题上形成更有根据的观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Calming "Internet Arguments" with Design

"Internet arguments" are refer to users exchanging heated comments online. However, argumentation can also be beneficial for exchanging ideas on a topic with conflicting information. This is the situation with what Horst Rittel refers to as “wicked problem,” whereby solutions to problems are complex due toconflicting information. To assist discourse surrounding wicked problems, scholars created Computer Supported Argument Visualizations (CSAV). This exploratory pilot gathered user insight on when people prefer argumentation tools by asking participants to debate the complexities of Climate Change online. The results in this pilot study suggests that CSAVs for more formal argumentation might assist science journalism students with developing more informed opinions on the subject of Climate Change.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI

自引率

0.00%

发文量