霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤:淋巴结细针抽吸的流式细胞免疫分型

Khondoker Hafiza Khanom, S. Tarafder, Humayun Sattar
{"title":"霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤:淋巴结细针抽吸的流式细胞免疫分型","authors":"Khondoker Hafiza Khanom, S. Tarafder, Humayun Sattar","doi":"10.33425/2639-944x.1097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) differ substantially in response to therapy and course. So accurate differentiation is important for therapeutic decision. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of flow cytometry in diagnosis of Hodgkin and Non--Hodgkin lymphoma on fine needle aspirate (FNA) of lymph node by following immunophenotypic diagnostic criteria based on expression of CD markers. Method: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was done on 40 clinically suspected lymphoma cases. If atypical lymphocytes were present FCI was performed with a complete panel of monoclonal antibodies (CD3,CD4,CD8,CD5,CD7,CD10,CD19,CD20,CD22,CD23,CD25,CD30,CD45,CD79a,CD79b,CD95,FMC7,CD40,CD15,CD56, Kappa, Lambda and Bcl-2) by dual flow color cytometry. FCI data were interpreted to diagnose lymphoma according to WHO classification. Wherever possible the diagnosis was compared with available histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) reports. Result: Out of 40 cases, 32 (80%) cases were diagnosed and characterized as lymphoma. Among 32 cases, 31 (96.9%) cases were Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 1 (3.1%) case was Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Among 29 histopathology reports available, comparison between FCI and histopathology showed concordance (both complete and partial) in 13 (44.8%) cases and discordance in 16 (55.2%) cases. Among 17 immunohistochemistry (IHC) reports available, comparison between FCI and IHC showed concordance (both complete and partial) in 12 (70.6%) cases and discordance in 5 (29.4%) cases. Conclusion: FCI from FNA sample can enhance the diagnostic potential and avoid the need for invasive surgical biopsies. Moreover, it can diagnose more Non-Hodgkin lymphoma than Hodgkin lymphoma.","PeriodicalId":231586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Flowcytometric Immunophenotyping on Fine Needle Aspirate of Lymph Node\",\"authors\":\"Khondoker Hafiza Khanom, S. Tarafder, Humayun Sattar\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-944x.1097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) differ substantially in response to therapy and course. So accurate differentiation is important for therapeutic decision. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of flow cytometry in diagnosis of Hodgkin and Non--Hodgkin lymphoma on fine needle aspirate (FNA) of lymph node by following immunophenotypic diagnostic criteria based on expression of CD markers. Method: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was done on 40 clinically suspected lymphoma cases. If atypical lymphocytes were present FCI was performed with a complete panel of monoclonal antibodies (CD3,CD4,CD8,CD5,CD7,CD10,CD19,CD20,CD22,CD23,CD25,CD30,CD45,CD79a,CD79b,CD95,FMC7,CD40,CD15,CD56, Kappa, Lambda and Bcl-2) by dual flow color cytometry. FCI data were interpreted to diagnose lymphoma according to WHO classification. Wherever possible the diagnosis was compared with available histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) reports. Result: Out of 40 cases, 32 (80%) cases were diagnosed and characterized as lymphoma. Among 32 cases, 31 (96.9%) cases were Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 1 (3.1%) case was Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Among 29 histopathology reports available, comparison between FCI and histopathology showed concordance (both complete and partial) in 13 (44.8%) cases and discordance in 16 (55.2%) cases. Among 17 immunohistochemistry (IHC) reports available, comparison between FCI and IHC showed concordance (both complete and partial) in 12 (70.6%) cases and discordance in 5 (29.4%) cases. Conclusion: FCI from FNA sample can enhance the diagnostic potential and avoid the need for invasive surgical biopsies. Moreover, it can diagnose more Non-Hodgkin lymphoma than Hodgkin lymphoma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-944x.1097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-944x.1097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)在治疗反应和病程上有很大的不同。所以准确的鉴别对治疗决策很重要。目的:本研究旨在评价流式细胞术在淋巴结细针抽吸(FNA)淋巴瘤诊断中的应用价值,以CD标记物表达为免疫表型诊断标准。方法:对40例临床疑似淋巴瘤患者行细针穿刺细胞学检查。如果存在非典型淋巴细胞,则采用双流式彩色细胞术对单克隆抗体(CD3、CD4、CD8、CD5、CD7、CD10、CD19、CD20、CD22、CD23、CD25、CD30、CD45、CD79a、CD79b、CD95、FMC7、CD40、CD15、CD56、Kappa、Lambda和Bcl-2)进行FCI检测。FCI数据被解释为根据WHO分类诊断淋巴瘤。在可能的情况下,将诊断与现有的组织病理学和免疫组织化学(IHC)报告进行比较。结果:40例患者中,32例(80%)确诊为淋巴瘤。32例中,非霍奇金淋巴瘤31例(96.9%),霍奇金淋巴瘤1例(3.1%)。在现有的29例组织病理学报告中,FCI与组织病理学比较显示13例(44.8%)完全或部分一致,16例(55.2%)不一致。在现有的17例免疫组化(IHC)报告中,FCI与IHC的比较显示12例(70.6%)完全或部分一致,5例(29.4%)不一致。结论:FNA标本的FCI可提高诊断潜力,避免侵入性手术活检。此外,它对非霍奇金淋巴瘤的诊断率高于霍奇金淋巴瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Flowcytometric Immunophenotyping on Fine Needle Aspirate of Lymph Node
Introduction: Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) differ substantially in response to therapy and course. So accurate differentiation is important for therapeutic decision. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of flow cytometry in diagnosis of Hodgkin and Non--Hodgkin lymphoma on fine needle aspirate (FNA) of lymph node by following immunophenotypic diagnostic criteria based on expression of CD markers. Method: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was done on 40 clinically suspected lymphoma cases. If atypical lymphocytes were present FCI was performed with a complete panel of monoclonal antibodies (CD3,CD4,CD8,CD5,CD7,CD10,CD19,CD20,CD22,CD23,CD25,CD30,CD45,CD79a,CD79b,CD95,FMC7,CD40,CD15,CD56, Kappa, Lambda and Bcl-2) by dual flow color cytometry. FCI data were interpreted to diagnose lymphoma according to WHO classification. Wherever possible the diagnosis was compared with available histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) reports. Result: Out of 40 cases, 32 (80%) cases were diagnosed and characterized as lymphoma. Among 32 cases, 31 (96.9%) cases were Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 1 (3.1%) case was Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Among 29 histopathology reports available, comparison between FCI and histopathology showed concordance (both complete and partial) in 13 (44.8%) cases and discordance in 16 (55.2%) cases. Among 17 immunohistochemistry (IHC) reports available, comparison between FCI and IHC showed concordance (both complete and partial) in 12 (70.6%) cases and discordance in 5 (29.4%) cases. Conclusion: FCI from FNA sample can enhance the diagnostic potential and avoid the need for invasive surgical biopsies. Moreover, it can diagnose more Non-Hodgkin lymphoma than Hodgkin lymphoma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信