{"title":"Tomasz M. Dąbek OSB, Modlić się Psalmami, Wydawnictwo Benedyktynów, Tyniec–Kraków, 2019, ss. 98","authors":"J. Ćwikła","doi":"10.14746/pst.2020.36.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Book of Psalms is one of the most popular and most read Bible books. For over 2,000 years, both Jews and Christians — including Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox Christians — have been reading it. It is worth emphasizing, however, that this is not an easy book. It was created in a culture foreign to us, in a foreign language (Hebrew — biblical) — it was written by people with a different mentality than ours. Therefor to understand it, you need the right knowledge. Unfortunately, this can only be obtained at theological faculties. It is known, however, that not all Bible readers feel called to study theology. Many exegetes understand this and write comments for them on Bible books, including the Book of Psalms. One of these exegetes is Fr. professor Tomasz M. Dąbek, the author of the book: To pray with Psalms, which was published in 2019 in Tyniec–Krakow. He divided his dissertation into several parts, which he titled: Introduction (pp. 7–8), Psalter as a prayer book of the People of God of the First Covenant (pp. 9–44), Psalms in the New Testament (pp. 45–58), Psalter as a prayer book to monks, consecrated persons and clergy (pp. 59–68), Psalter in the liturgy and in the personal prayer of a Christian (pp. 69–74), Thoughts about some Psalms (pp. 75–94), Summary (pp. 95–96) and Bibliographic proposals (pp. 97–98). This review presents his book.","PeriodicalId":241712,"journal":{"name":"Poznań Theological Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznań Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pst.2020.36.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《诗篇》是最受欢迎和阅读最多的圣经书籍之一。两千多年来,犹太教徒和基督教徒——包括天主教徒、新教徒和东正教教徒——都在阅读《圣经》。然而,值得强调的是,这不是一本容易的书。它是在一种对我们来说陌生的文化中,用一种外语(希伯来语-圣经)创作的,它是由与我们心态不同的人写的。因此,要理解它,你需要正确的知识。不幸的是,这只能在神学院获得。然而,我们知道,并不是所有的圣经读者都觉得自己被呼召去学习神学。许多注释者明白这一点,并为他们写圣经书籍的评论,包括诗篇。其中一位注释者是dr . Tomasz M. Dąbek教授,他是《用诗篇祈祷》一书的作者,该书于2019年在泰涅茨-克拉科夫出版。他把他的论文分成几个部分,他的标题是:引言(7-8页)、《诗篇》作为第一盟约天主子民的祈祷书(9-44页)、《新约诗篇》(45-58页)、《诗篇》作为僧侣、献身者和神职人员的祈祷书(59-68页)、《诗篇》在礼拜仪式和基督徒的个人祈祷中(69-74页)、《关于一些诗篇的思考》(75-94页)、《概要》(95-96页)和书目建议(97-98页)。这篇评论介绍了他的书。
Tomasz M. Dąbek OSB, Modlić się Psalmami, Wydawnictwo Benedyktynów, Tyniec–Kraków, 2019, ss. 98
Abstract The Book of Psalms is one of the most popular and most read Bible books. For over 2,000 years, both Jews and Christians — including Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox Christians — have been reading it. It is worth emphasizing, however, that this is not an easy book. It was created in a culture foreign to us, in a foreign language (Hebrew — biblical) — it was written by people with a different mentality than ours. Therefor to understand it, you need the right knowledge. Unfortunately, this can only be obtained at theological faculties. It is known, however, that not all Bible readers feel called to study theology. Many exegetes understand this and write comments for them on Bible books, including the Book of Psalms. One of these exegetes is Fr. professor Tomasz M. Dąbek, the author of the book: To pray with Psalms, which was published in 2019 in Tyniec–Krakow. He divided his dissertation into several parts, which he titled: Introduction (pp. 7–8), Psalter as a prayer book of the People of God of the First Covenant (pp. 9–44), Psalms in the New Testament (pp. 45–58), Psalter as a prayer book to monks, consecrated persons and clergy (pp. 59–68), Psalter in the liturgy and in the personal prayer of a Christian (pp. 69–74), Thoughts about some Psalms (pp. 75–94), Summary (pp. 95–96) and Bibliographic proposals (pp. 97–98). This review presents his book.