改善配电网络弹性的风险缓解方法

J. Leite, M. Kezunovic
{"title":"改善配电网络弹性的风险缓解方法","authors":"J. Leite, M. Kezunovic","doi":"10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"traditionally the risk analysis framework comprises two steps: risk assessment and risk mitigation. The tracking of operating conditions for each feeder section of a distribution network using the prediction of hourly risk levels and monthly accumulated risks corresponds to the first step. In this paper, we evaluate the use of two modern approaches to risk mitigation, one commonly named as automatic fault location, isolation and service restoration (FLISR), and other as demand response management (DRM). Since the implementation of these approaches depends on distribution automation, the control actions to mitigate the risk are carried out through the distribution management system. Results reveal advantages in the implementation of FLISR and DRM for improving the distribution network resilience. The developed visualization tool with georeferenced data from a real-world distribution network supports the achieved benefits.","PeriodicalId":448644,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Mitigation Approaches for Improved Resilience in Distribution Networks\",\"authors\":\"J. Leite, M. Kezunovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"traditionally the risk analysis framework comprises two steps: risk assessment and risk mitigation. The tracking of operating conditions for each feeder section of a distribution network using the prediction of hourly risk levels and monthly accumulated risks corresponds to the first step. In this paper, we evaluate the use of two modern approaches to risk mitigation, one commonly named as automatic fault location, isolation and service restoration (FLISR), and other as demand response management (DRM). Since the implementation of these approaches depends on distribution automation, the control actions to mitigate the risk are carried out through the distribution management system. Results reveal advantages in the implementation of FLISR and DRM for improving the distribution network resilience. The developed visualization tool with georeferenced data from a real-world distribution network supports the achieved benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDLA47668.2020.9326210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

传统上,风险分析框架包括两个步骤:风险评估和风险缓解。第一步是利用每小时风险水平和每月累积风险预测对配电网各馈线段的运行状况进行跟踪。在本文中,我们评估了两种现代风险缓解方法的使用,一种通常被称为自动故障定位、隔离和服务恢复(FLISR),另一种被称为需求响应管理(DRM)。由于这些方法的实施依赖于配电自动化,因此降低风险的控制行动是通过配电管理系统进行的。结果表明,FLISR和DRM在提高配电网弹性方面具有优势。开发的可视化工具具有来自实际配电网的地理参考数据,支持实现的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Mitigation Approaches for Improved Resilience in Distribution Networks
traditionally the risk analysis framework comprises two steps: risk assessment and risk mitigation. The tracking of operating conditions for each feeder section of a distribution network using the prediction of hourly risk levels and monthly accumulated risks corresponds to the first step. In this paper, we evaluate the use of two modern approaches to risk mitigation, one commonly named as automatic fault location, isolation and service restoration (FLISR), and other as demand response management (DRM). Since the implementation of these approaches depends on distribution automation, the control actions to mitigate the risk are carried out through the distribution management system. Results reveal advantages in the implementation of FLISR and DRM for improving the distribution network resilience. The developed visualization tool with georeferenced data from a real-world distribution network supports the achieved benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信