俄罗斯地区议会制制度开放性研究的经验

A. Pugachev
{"title":"俄罗斯地区议会制制度开放性研究的经验","authors":"A. Pugachev","doi":"10.5922/1994-5280-2022-2-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the author‘s approach to assessing the democracy of regional political regimes in Russia by analyzing the openness of legislative (representative) state authorities of the subjects of the Federation. A broad interpretation of the openness of the regional parliament is given, including the openness of decision-making process, legislative work, feedback from citizens, social accessibility of parliament, guarantees of equality of parliamentary parties on regional television, radio and the internal openness of parliament. The article presents the author‘s methodology for assessing the openness of regional parliaments, based on a comparison of their practices with the identifi practices of openness of the Federal Assembly, the totality of which the author proposes to consider as reference for the current level of political development of the country. The results of the calculations of the level of openness are analyzed both in criteria and in spatial dimensions. A comparison of the rating of regions by this indicator in 2020 and 2021 indicates a gradual increase in the openness of regional parliaments. At the same time, the author comes to the conclusion that the results obtained do not allow us to speak about a high level of openness of regional legislatures, since most of them demonstrate average indicators. The leaders of openness were also identifi who received maximum points, but still lag behind the level of openness of the Federal Assembly. At the same time, they demonstrate maximum performance in the areas of political openness, which allows us to speak of them as parliaments open to their voters.","PeriodicalId":148240,"journal":{"name":"Regional nye issledovaniya","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The experience of studying the openness of regional parliamentarism institution in Russia\",\"authors\":\"A. Pugachev\",\"doi\":\"10.5922/1994-5280-2022-2-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the author‘s approach to assessing the democracy of regional political regimes in Russia by analyzing the openness of legislative (representative) state authorities of the subjects of the Federation. A broad interpretation of the openness of the regional parliament is given, including the openness of decision-making process, legislative work, feedback from citizens, social accessibility of parliament, guarantees of equality of parliamentary parties on regional television, radio and the internal openness of parliament. The article presents the author‘s methodology for assessing the openness of regional parliaments, based on a comparison of their practices with the identifi practices of openness of the Federal Assembly, the totality of which the author proposes to consider as reference for the current level of political development of the country. The results of the calculations of the level of openness are analyzed both in criteria and in spatial dimensions. A comparison of the rating of regions by this indicator in 2020 and 2021 indicates a gradual increase in the openness of regional parliaments. At the same time, the author comes to the conclusion that the results obtained do not allow us to speak about a high level of openness of regional legislatures, since most of them demonstrate average indicators. The leaders of openness were also identifi who received maximum points, but still lag behind the level of openness of the Federal Assembly. At the same time, they demonstrate maximum performance in the areas of political openness, which allows us to speak of them as parliaments open to their voters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional nye issledovaniya\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional nye issledovaniya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-2-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional nye issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-2-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了作者通过分析联邦主体的立法(代议制)国家当局的开放性来评估俄罗斯地区政治制度民主的方法。对地区议会的公开性进行了广义的解释,包括决策过程的公开性、立法工作的公开性、公民反馈的公开性、议会的社会可及性、议会政党在地区电视、广播上的平等保障以及议会内部的公开性。本文介绍了作者评估地区议会开放性的方法,将其实践与联邦议会开放性的具体实践进行比较,作者建议将其总体作为该国当前政治发展水平的参考。对开放程度的计算结果从标准和空间维度两方面进行了分析。对2020年和2021年该指标对各地区的评级进行比较表明,各地区议会的开放程度逐步提高。与此同时,作者得出的结论是,所获得的结果不允许我们谈论区域立法机构的高度开放,因为它们中的大多数显示出平均指标。开放性的领导者也被确定谁获得了最高分,但仍然落后于联邦议会的开放性水平。与此同时,它们在政治开放领域表现出最大的表现,这使我们能够把它们称为向选民开放的议会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The experience of studying the openness of regional parliamentarism institution in Russia
The article presents the author‘s approach to assessing the democracy of regional political regimes in Russia by analyzing the openness of legislative (representative) state authorities of the subjects of the Federation. A broad interpretation of the openness of the regional parliament is given, including the openness of decision-making process, legislative work, feedback from citizens, social accessibility of parliament, guarantees of equality of parliamentary parties on regional television, radio and the internal openness of parliament. The article presents the author‘s methodology for assessing the openness of regional parliaments, based on a comparison of their practices with the identifi practices of openness of the Federal Assembly, the totality of which the author proposes to consider as reference for the current level of political development of the country. The results of the calculations of the level of openness are analyzed both in criteria and in spatial dimensions. A comparison of the rating of regions by this indicator in 2020 and 2021 indicates a gradual increase in the openness of regional parliaments. At the same time, the author comes to the conclusion that the results obtained do not allow us to speak about a high level of openness of regional legislatures, since most of them demonstrate average indicators. The leaders of openness were also identifi who received maximum points, but still lag behind the level of openness of the Federal Assembly. At the same time, they demonstrate maximum performance in the areas of political openness, which allows us to speak of them as parliaments open to their voters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信