{"title":"磺胺氮嗪与德拉吉尔治疗青少年慢性关节炎的比较研究。","authors":"J Hoza, T Kadlecová, D Nĕmcová, S Havelka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty nine consecutive patients with pauciarticular and polyarticular juvenile chronic arthritis were randomised to treatment with either sulphasalazine or Delagil (chlorochinum diphosphoricum) in a parallel 6 month clinical trial. We compared clinical and laboratory signs of activity before and after the treatment. Of 21 patients with Sulphasalazine 10 were improved, 7 unchanged and in 4 patients had the therapy to be withdrawn. Of 18 patients with Delagil 5 were improved, 12 without effect and withdrawal was necessary in 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":75422,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Medica","volume":"37 1-2","pages":"80-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sulphasalazine and Delagil--a comparative study in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"J Hoza, T Kadlecová, D Nĕmcová, S Havelka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thirty nine consecutive patients with pauciarticular and polyarticular juvenile chronic arthritis were randomised to treatment with either sulphasalazine or Delagil (chlorochinum diphosphoricum) in a parallel 6 month clinical trial. We compared clinical and laboratory signs of activity before and after the treatment. Of 21 patients with Sulphasalazine 10 were improved, 7 unchanged and in 4 patients had the therapy to be withdrawn. Of 18 patients with Delagil 5 were improved, 12 without effect and withdrawal was necessary in 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Medica\",\"volume\":\"37 1-2\",\"pages\":\"80-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sulphasalazine and Delagil--a comparative study in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis.
Thirty nine consecutive patients with pauciarticular and polyarticular juvenile chronic arthritis were randomised to treatment with either sulphasalazine or Delagil (chlorochinum diphosphoricum) in a parallel 6 month clinical trial. We compared clinical and laboratory signs of activity before and after the treatment. Of 21 patients with Sulphasalazine 10 were improved, 7 unchanged and in 4 patients had the therapy to be withdrawn. Of 18 patients with Delagil 5 were improved, 12 without effect and withdrawal was necessary in 1.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
