电损伤心律失常的患病率、临床谱及并发症

Syed Obydur Rahman, Kartick Chandra Halder, Md. Arif Anam, Salimullah Akand, M. Aslam, M. M. Rashid
{"title":"电损伤心律失常的患病率、临床谱及并发症","authors":"Syed Obydur Rahman, Kartick Chandra Halder, Md. Arif Anam, Salimullah Akand, M. Aslam, M. M. Rashid","doi":"10.36348/gajms.2022.v04i04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Electrical accidents (EA) are rare, but can cause serious and potentially life-threatening injuries to multiple organs. The majority of epidemiological data refers to workplace accidents which account for a significant share of such accidents in adults. Exposure to electric shock has been associated with an increased risk of developing immediate and delayed cardiac arrhythmias. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and different symptoms in patient with high voltage and low voltage electrical injury. Methods: This was observational prospective study was carried out at the Dept. of Cardiology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College Hospital, Faridpur, Bangladesh from January to June 2021. 51 consecutive patients with electrical injury who were admitted. Admission criteria were age ≥15 years, loss of consciousness, cardiac arrest, electrocardiographic abnormalities, soft tissue damage and burns. Patients were categorized into high and low voltage injury group and their variables were compared. Results: The mean age of the patients was 32.3±10.4 years among them 41 (82.3%) were male. Patients who sustain high voltage electrical injury (>1000V) were 18 (35.2%) and low voltage injury (<1000V) were 33 (64.7%).Cardiac arrhythmias like sinus tachycardia (11.1% vs 6.0%, p=0.054), sinus bradycardia (11.1% vs 3.0% p=0.254), ventricular premature beats (5.6% vs3.0%, p=0.674), atrial fibrillation (11.1% vs 0%, p=0.054) were observed in high voltage and low voltage group. The commonest presenting symptoms in both groups were pain (77.8% vs 81.8% p=0.560) and fatigue (55.6% vs 39.3%, p=0.328). Conclusion: In this study few non-fatal cardiac arrhythmias were observed in both high and low voltage electrical injury group. Parameters considered to be risk factors such as known structural heart disease, loss of consciousness, high voltage electric shock, burn and soft tissue injuries were also not significant predictors of the occurrence of arrhythmias. There is no significant difference in the presenting symptoms and types of arrhythmias observed between low voltage and high voltage injury group.","PeriodicalId":397187,"journal":{"name":"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias, Clinical Spectrum and Complications of Electrical Injury\",\"authors\":\"Syed Obydur Rahman, Kartick Chandra Halder, Md. Arif Anam, Salimullah Akand, M. Aslam, M. M. Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.36348/gajms.2022.v04i04.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Electrical accidents (EA) are rare, but can cause serious and potentially life-threatening injuries to multiple organs. The majority of epidemiological data refers to workplace accidents which account for a significant share of such accidents in adults. Exposure to electric shock has been associated with an increased risk of developing immediate and delayed cardiac arrhythmias. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and different symptoms in patient with high voltage and low voltage electrical injury. Methods: This was observational prospective study was carried out at the Dept. of Cardiology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College Hospital, Faridpur, Bangladesh from January to June 2021. 51 consecutive patients with electrical injury who were admitted. Admission criteria were age ≥15 years, loss of consciousness, cardiac arrest, electrocardiographic abnormalities, soft tissue damage and burns. Patients were categorized into high and low voltage injury group and their variables were compared. Results: The mean age of the patients was 32.3±10.4 years among them 41 (82.3%) were male. Patients who sustain high voltage electrical injury (>1000V) were 18 (35.2%) and low voltage injury (<1000V) were 33 (64.7%).Cardiac arrhythmias like sinus tachycardia (11.1% vs 6.0%, p=0.054), sinus bradycardia (11.1% vs 3.0% p=0.254), ventricular premature beats (5.6% vs3.0%, p=0.674), atrial fibrillation (11.1% vs 0%, p=0.054) were observed in high voltage and low voltage group. The commonest presenting symptoms in both groups were pain (77.8% vs 81.8% p=0.560) and fatigue (55.6% vs 39.3%, p=0.328). Conclusion: In this study few non-fatal cardiac arrhythmias were observed in both high and low voltage electrical injury group. Parameters considered to be risk factors such as known structural heart disease, loss of consciousness, high voltage electric shock, burn and soft tissue injuries were also not significant predictors of the occurrence of arrhythmias. There is no significant difference in the presenting symptoms and types of arrhythmias observed between low voltage and high voltage injury group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":397187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36348/gajms.2022.v04i04.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/gajms.2022.v04i04.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电事故(EA)是罕见的,但可以造成严重和潜在的危及生命的多器官损伤。大多数流行病学数据涉及工作场所事故,这类事故在成年人中占很大比例。接触电击会增加发生即时和延迟性心律失常的风险。目的:探讨高、低压电伤患者心律失常的发生率及不同症状。方法:这是一项观察性前瞻性研究,于2021年1月至6月在孟加拉国法里德布尔Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医学院医院心内科进行。51例连续住院的电损伤患者。入院标准为年龄≥15岁、意识丧失、心脏骤停、心电图异常、软组织损伤和烧伤。将患者分为高、低压损伤组,并比较其各项指标。结果:患者平均年龄32.3±10.4岁,其中男性41例(82.3%)。高压电伤(>1000V) 18例(35.2%),低压电伤(<1000V) 33例(64.7%)。高、低压组心律失常有窦性心动过速(11.1% vs 6.0%, p=0.054)、窦性心动过缓(11.1% vs3.0%, p=0.254)、室性早搏(5.6% vs3.0%, p=0.674)、房颤(11.1% vs 0%, p=0.054)。两组患者最常见的症状是疼痛(77.8% vs 81.8% p=0.560)和疲劳(55.6% vs 39.3%, p=0.328)。结论:高、低压电损伤组均未见致死性心律失常。被认为是危险因素的参数,如已知的结构性心脏病、意识丧失、高压电击、烧伤和软组织损伤,也不是心律失常发生的显著预测因素。低压损伤组与高压损伤组心律失常的表现及类型无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias, Clinical Spectrum and Complications of Electrical Injury
Background: Electrical accidents (EA) are rare, but can cause serious and potentially life-threatening injuries to multiple organs. The majority of epidemiological data refers to workplace accidents which account for a significant share of such accidents in adults. Exposure to electric shock has been associated with an increased risk of developing immediate and delayed cardiac arrhythmias. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and different symptoms in patient with high voltage and low voltage electrical injury. Methods: This was observational prospective study was carried out at the Dept. of Cardiology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College Hospital, Faridpur, Bangladesh from January to June 2021. 51 consecutive patients with electrical injury who were admitted. Admission criteria were age ≥15 years, loss of consciousness, cardiac arrest, electrocardiographic abnormalities, soft tissue damage and burns. Patients were categorized into high and low voltage injury group and their variables were compared. Results: The mean age of the patients was 32.3±10.4 years among them 41 (82.3%) were male. Patients who sustain high voltage electrical injury (>1000V) were 18 (35.2%) and low voltage injury (<1000V) were 33 (64.7%).Cardiac arrhythmias like sinus tachycardia (11.1% vs 6.0%, p=0.054), sinus bradycardia (11.1% vs 3.0% p=0.254), ventricular premature beats (5.6% vs3.0%, p=0.674), atrial fibrillation (11.1% vs 0%, p=0.054) were observed in high voltage and low voltage group. The commonest presenting symptoms in both groups were pain (77.8% vs 81.8% p=0.560) and fatigue (55.6% vs 39.3%, p=0.328). Conclusion: In this study few non-fatal cardiac arrhythmias were observed in both high and low voltage electrical injury group. Parameters considered to be risk factors such as known structural heart disease, loss of consciousness, high voltage electric shock, burn and soft tissue injuries were also not significant predictors of the occurrence of arrhythmias. There is no significant difference in the presenting symptoms and types of arrhythmias observed between low voltage and high voltage injury group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信