{"title":"遗传刚性,分离和密度:纪念I.G.罗森伯格教授","authors":"L. Haddad, M. Miyakawa, M. Pouzet, H. Tatsumi","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL51352.2021.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We continue the investigation of systems of hereditarily rigid relations started in Couceiro, Haddad, Pouzet and Schölzel [1]. We observe that on a set <tex>$V$</tex> with <tex>$m$</tex> elements, there is a hereditarily rigid set <tex>$\\mathcal{R}$</tex> made of <tex>$n$</tex> tournaments if and only if <tex>$m(m-1)\\leq 2^{n}$</tex>. We ask if the same inequality holds when the tournaments are replaced by linear orders. This problem has an equivalent formulation in terms of separation of linear orders. Let <tex>$h_{\\text{Lin}}(m)$</tex> be the least cardinal <tex>$n$</tex> such that there is a family <tex>$\\mathcal{R}$</tex> of <tex>$n$</tex> linear orders on an <tex>$m$</tex>-element set <tex>$V$</tex> such that any two distinct ordered pairs of distinct elements of <tex>$V$</tex> are separated by some member of <tex>$\\mathcal{R}$</tex>, then <tex>$[\\log_{2}(m(m-1))]\\leq h_{\\text{Lin}}(m)$</tex> with equality if <tex>$m\\leq 7$</tex>. We ask whether the equality holds for every <tex>$m$</tex>. We prove that <tex>$h_{\\text{Lin}}(m+1)\\leq h_{\\text{Lin}}(m)+1$</tex>. If <tex>$V$</tex> is infinite, we show that <tex>$h_{\\text{Lin}}(m)=\\aleph_{0}$</tex> for <tex>$m\\leq 2^{\\aleph_{0}}$</tex>. More generally, we prove that the two equalities <tex>$h_{\\text{Lin}}(m)=log_{2}(m)=d$</tex> (Lin <tex>$(V)$</tex>) hold, where <tex>$\\log_{2}(m)$</tex> is the least cardinal <tex>$\\mu$</tex> such that <tex>$m\\leq 2^{\\mu}$</tex>, and <tex>$d$</tex> (Lin <tex>$(V)$</tex>) is the topological density of the set Lin (V) of linear orders on <tex>$V$</tex> (viewed as a subset of the power set <tex>$\\mathcal{P}(V\\times V)$</tex> equipped with the product topology). These equalities follow from the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis, but we do not know whether they hold without any set theoretical hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":129346,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 51st International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hereditary rigidity, separation and density: In memory of Professor I.G. Rosenberg\",\"authors\":\"L. Haddad, M. Miyakawa, M. Pouzet, H. Tatsumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL51352.2021.00020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We continue the investigation of systems of hereditarily rigid relations started in Couceiro, Haddad, Pouzet and Schölzel [1]. We observe that on a set <tex>$V$</tex> with <tex>$m$</tex> elements, there is a hereditarily rigid set <tex>$\\\\mathcal{R}$</tex> made of <tex>$n$</tex> tournaments if and only if <tex>$m(m-1)\\\\leq 2^{n}$</tex>. We ask if the same inequality holds when the tournaments are replaced by linear orders. This problem has an equivalent formulation in terms of separation of linear orders. Let <tex>$h_{\\\\text{Lin}}(m)$</tex> be the least cardinal <tex>$n$</tex> such that there is a family <tex>$\\\\mathcal{R}$</tex> of <tex>$n$</tex> linear orders on an <tex>$m$</tex>-element set <tex>$V$</tex> such that any two distinct ordered pairs of distinct elements of <tex>$V$</tex> are separated by some member of <tex>$\\\\mathcal{R}$</tex>, then <tex>$[\\\\log_{2}(m(m-1))]\\\\leq h_{\\\\text{Lin}}(m)$</tex> with equality if <tex>$m\\\\leq 7$</tex>. We ask whether the equality holds for every <tex>$m$</tex>. We prove that <tex>$h_{\\\\text{Lin}}(m+1)\\\\leq h_{\\\\text{Lin}}(m)+1$</tex>. If <tex>$V$</tex> is infinite, we show that <tex>$h_{\\\\text{Lin}}(m)=\\\\aleph_{0}$</tex> for <tex>$m\\\\leq 2^{\\\\aleph_{0}}$</tex>. More generally, we prove that the two equalities <tex>$h_{\\\\text{Lin}}(m)=log_{2}(m)=d$</tex> (Lin <tex>$(V)$</tex>) hold, where <tex>$\\\\log_{2}(m)$</tex> is the least cardinal <tex>$\\\\mu$</tex> such that <tex>$m\\\\leq 2^{\\\\mu}$</tex>, and <tex>$d$</tex> (Lin <tex>$(V)$</tex>) is the topological density of the set Lin (V) of linear orders on <tex>$V$</tex> (viewed as a subset of the power set <tex>$\\\\mathcal{P}(V\\\\times V)$</tex> equipped with the product topology). These equalities follow from the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis, but we do not know whether they hold without any set theoretical hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 51st International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 51st International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL51352.2021.00020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 51st International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL51352.2021.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hereditary rigidity, separation and density: In memory of Professor I.G. Rosenberg
We continue the investigation of systems of hereditarily rigid relations started in Couceiro, Haddad, Pouzet and Schölzel [1]. We observe that on a set $V$ with $m$ elements, there is a hereditarily rigid set $\mathcal{R}$ made of $n$ tournaments if and only if $m(m-1)\leq 2^{n}$. We ask if the same inequality holds when the tournaments are replaced by linear orders. This problem has an equivalent formulation in terms of separation of linear orders. Let $h_{\text{Lin}}(m)$ be the least cardinal $n$ such that there is a family $\mathcal{R}$ of $n$ linear orders on an $m$-element set $V$ such that any two distinct ordered pairs of distinct elements of $V$ are separated by some member of $\mathcal{R}$, then $[\log_{2}(m(m-1))]\leq h_{\text{Lin}}(m)$ with equality if $m\leq 7$. We ask whether the equality holds for every $m$. We prove that $h_{\text{Lin}}(m+1)\leq h_{\text{Lin}}(m)+1$. If $V$ is infinite, we show that $h_{\text{Lin}}(m)=\aleph_{0}$ for $m\leq 2^{\aleph_{0}}$. More generally, we prove that the two equalities $h_{\text{Lin}}(m)=log_{2}(m)=d$ (Lin $(V)$) hold, where $\log_{2}(m)$ is the least cardinal $\mu$ such that $m\leq 2^{\mu}$, and $d$ (Lin $(V)$) is the topological density of the set Lin (V) of linear orders on $V$ (viewed as a subset of the power set $\mathcal{P}(V\times V)$ equipped with the product topology). These equalities follow from the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis, but we do not know whether they hold without any set theoretical hypothesis.