智慧城市的信息管理

M. Stone, J. Knapper, Geraint Evans, Eleni Aravopoulou
{"title":"智慧城市的信息管理","authors":"M. Stone, J. Knapper, Geraint Evans, Eleni Aravopoulou","doi":"10.1108/BL-07-2018-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate information management in a smart city. It identifies the main trends in progress and how innovation in information technology is helping all those in the smart city ecosystem in terms of generating new sources of data and connecting them. It investigates how information management in the smart city may go through several phases, but contests the notion that the co-ordinated information management that is the dream of many city managers is an appropriate vision, given the tendency in the private sector for competing information platforms to develop, giving value in different ways.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper has been written by using a combination of academic insight and literature, extensive research of relevant grey literature (e.g. blogs and industry press) and interviews and interaction with some of the organisations involved in developing and implementing the smart city concept, including public transport organisations, other data providers, analysts and systems and sensor suppliers.\n\n\nFindings\nSmart city concepts are evolving in different ways, with divergence of views which involves centralisation and control of information by city authorities and a more democratic view in which the information is managed on different platforms between which smart city stakeholders can choose.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research method is exploratory. Validating the findings would require a more structured approach in which stakeholders of all kinds are consulted.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAll organisational stakeholders in the idea and delivery of smart cities need to consider how their interests in smart city information and those of other stakeholders are evolving and to what extent they should be in partnership with other members of the ecosystem in generating and using the information.\n\n\nSocial implications\nIndividuals, whether workers, commuters, shoppers, tourists or others, will be greatly affected by the evolution of smart city information, and their choices about whether to be smart themselves will have an important effect on the benefits they receive from city smartening and on the viability of the smart cities.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLittle research has been carried out into the different choices organisations and individuals have in terms of how they will relate to smart city information and how they can manage it. This research makes a start on this task.\n","PeriodicalId":293295,"journal":{"name":"The Bottom Line","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information management in the smart city\",\"authors\":\"M. Stone, J. Knapper, Geraint Evans, Eleni Aravopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/BL-07-2018-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate information management in a smart city. It identifies the main trends in progress and how innovation in information technology is helping all those in the smart city ecosystem in terms of generating new sources of data and connecting them. It investigates how information management in the smart city may go through several phases, but contests the notion that the co-ordinated information management that is the dream of many city managers is an appropriate vision, given the tendency in the private sector for competing information platforms to develop, giving value in different ways.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper has been written by using a combination of academic insight and literature, extensive research of relevant grey literature (e.g. blogs and industry press) and interviews and interaction with some of the organisations involved in developing and implementing the smart city concept, including public transport organisations, other data providers, analysts and systems and sensor suppliers.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nSmart city concepts are evolving in different ways, with divergence of views which involves centralisation and control of information by city authorities and a more democratic view in which the information is managed on different platforms between which smart city stakeholders can choose.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe research method is exploratory. Validating the findings would require a more structured approach in which stakeholders of all kinds are consulted.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nAll organisational stakeholders in the idea and delivery of smart cities need to consider how their interests in smart city information and those of other stakeholders are evolving and to what extent they should be in partnership with other members of the ecosystem in generating and using the information.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nIndividuals, whether workers, commuters, shoppers, tourists or others, will be greatly affected by the evolution of smart city information, and their choices about whether to be smart themselves will have an important effect on the benefits they receive from city smartening and on the viability of the smart cities.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nLittle research has been carried out into the different choices organisations and individuals have in terms of how they will relate to smart city information and how they can manage it. This research makes a start on this task.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":293295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bottom Line\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bottom Line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-07-2018-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bottom Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-07-2018-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

本文的目的是研究智慧城市的信息管理。它确定了进展中的主要趋势,以及信息技术创新如何在产生新数据源和连接数据方面帮助智慧城市生态系统中的所有人。它调查了智慧城市的信息管理如何经历几个阶段,但对许多城市管理者梦想的协调信息管理是一个合适的愿景这一概念提出了质疑,因为私营部门倾向于竞争信息平台的发展,以不同的方式提供价值。设计/方法/方法本文结合了学术见解和文献,对相关灰色文献(例如博客和行业新闻)的广泛研究,以及与参与开发和实施智慧城市概念的一些组织的访谈和互动,包括公共交通组织,其他数据提供商,分析师和系统以及传感器供应商。智慧城市的概念正在以不同的方式发展,人们的观点存在分歧,其中包括城市当局对信息的集中和控制,以及更民主的观点,即信息在不同的平台上进行管理,智慧城市利益相关者可以在不同的平台上进行选择。研究的局限性/意义研究方法是探索性的。验证这些发现将需要一种更有条理的方法,在这种方法中,各种利益相关者都要征求意见。实践意义智慧城市理念和交付中的所有组织利益相关者都需要考虑他们对智慧城市信息的兴趣和其他利益相关者的兴趣是如何演变的,以及他们应该在多大程度上与生态系统的其他成员合作产生和使用信息。个人,无论是工人、通勤者、购物者、游客还是其他人,都将受到智慧城市信息发展的极大影响,他们对自己是否聪明的选择将对他们从城市智能化中获得的好处和智慧城市的可行性产生重要影响。关于组织和个人在如何与智慧城市信息联系以及如何管理这些信息方面的不同选择,很少有研究进行。这项研究为这项任务开了个好头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information management in the smart city
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate information management in a smart city. It identifies the main trends in progress and how innovation in information technology is helping all those in the smart city ecosystem in terms of generating new sources of data and connecting them. It investigates how information management in the smart city may go through several phases, but contests the notion that the co-ordinated information management that is the dream of many city managers is an appropriate vision, given the tendency in the private sector for competing information platforms to develop, giving value in different ways. Design/methodology/approach This paper has been written by using a combination of academic insight and literature, extensive research of relevant grey literature (e.g. blogs and industry press) and interviews and interaction with some of the organisations involved in developing and implementing the smart city concept, including public transport organisations, other data providers, analysts and systems and sensor suppliers. Findings Smart city concepts are evolving in different ways, with divergence of views which involves centralisation and control of information by city authorities and a more democratic view in which the information is managed on different platforms between which smart city stakeholders can choose. Research limitations/implications The research method is exploratory. Validating the findings would require a more structured approach in which stakeholders of all kinds are consulted. Practical implications All organisational stakeholders in the idea and delivery of smart cities need to consider how their interests in smart city information and those of other stakeholders are evolving and to what extent they should be in partnership with other members of the ecosystem in generating and using the information. Social implications Individuals, whether workers, commuters, shoppers, tourists or others, will be greatly affected by the evolution of smart city information, and their choices about whether to be smart themselves will have an important effect on the benefits they receive from city smartening and on the viability of the smart cities. Originality/value Little research has been carried out into the different choices organisations and individuals have in terms of how they will relate to smart city information and how they can manage it. This research makes a start on this task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信