{"title":"Alex Skibine教授的声明——美国众议院,印第安和阿拉斯加土著事务小组委员会,自然资源委员会:关于将土地纳入游戏目的信托决策的行政部门标准的听证会","authors":"A. Skibine","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2329850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My statement today is going to focus on Executive decisions to authorize gaming on off-reservation land acquired into trust after 1988. More precisely, my comments will address those Executive decisions made pursuant to the two part determination set out in section (b)(1)(A) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(A). These are the decisions which require concurrence by a state governor.","PeriodicalId":314145,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statement of Professor Alex Skibine -- US House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Indian and Alaska Native Affairs, Committee on Natural Resources: Hearing on Executive Branch Standards for Land into Trust Decisions for Gaming Purposes\",\"authors\":\"A. Skibine\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2329850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"My statement today is going to focus on Executive decisions to authorize gaming on off-reservation land acquired into trust after 1988. More precisely, my comments will address those Executive decisions made pursuant to the two part determination set out in section (b)(1)(A) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(A). These are the decisions which require concurrence by a state governor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2329850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2329850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Statement of Professor Alex Skibine -- US House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Indian and Alaska Native Affairs, Committee on Natural Resources: Hearing on Executive Branch Standards for Land into Trust Decisions for Gaming Purposes
My statement today is going to focus on Executive decisions to authorize gaming on off-reservation land acquired into trust after 1988. More precisely, my comments will address those Executive decisions made pursuant to the two part determination set out in section (b)(1)(A) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(A). These are the decisions which require concurrence by a state governor.