{"title":"抽取插值","authors":"A. Gurfinkel, Y. Vizel","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2014.6987601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a method for interpolation based on DRUP proofs. Interpolants are widely used in model checking, synthesis and other applications. Most interpolation algorithms rely on a resolution proof produced by a SAT-solver for unsatisfaible formulas. The proof is traversed and translated into an interpolant by replacing resolution steps with AND and OR gates. This process is efficient (once there is a proof) and generates interpolants that are linear in the size of the proof. In this paper, we address three known weakness of this approach: (i) performance degradation experienced by the SAT-solver and the extra memory requirements needed when logging a resolution proof; (ii) the proof generated by the solver is not necessarily the \"best\" proof for interpolantion, and (iii) combining proof logging with pre-processing is complicated. We show that these issues can be remedied by using DRUP proofs. First, we show how to produce an interpolant from a DRUP proof, even when pre-processing is enabled. Second, we give a novel interpolation algorithm that produces interpolants partially in CNF. Third, we show how DRUP proof can be restructured on-the-fly to yield better interpolants. We implemented our DRUP-based interpolation framework in MiniSAT, and evaluated its affect using Avy - a SAT-based model checking algorithm.","PeriodicalId":363683,"journal":{"name":"2014 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DRUPing for interpolates\",\"authors\":\"A. Gurfinkel, Y. Vizel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FMCAD.2014.6987601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a method for interpolation based on DRUP proofs. Interpolants are widely used in model checking, synthesis and other applications. Most interpolation algorithms rely on a resolution proof produced by a SAT-solver for unsatisfaible formulas. The proof is traversed and translated into an interpolant by replacing resolution steps with AND and OR gates. This process is efficient (once there is a proof) and generates interpolants that are linear in the size of the proof. In this paper, we address three known weakness of this approach: (i) performance degradation experienced by the SAT-solver and the extra memory requirements needed when logging a resolution proof; (ii) the proof generated by the solver is not necessarily the \\\"best\\\" proof for interpolantion, and (iii) combining proof logging with pre-processing is complicated. We show that these issues can be remedied by using DRUP proofs. First, we show how to produce an interpolant from a DRUP proof, even when pre-processing is enabled. Second, we give a novel interpolation algorithm that produces interpolants partially in CNF. Third, we show how DRUP proof can be restructured on-the-fly to yield better interpolants. We implemented our DRUP-based interpolation framework in MiniSAT, and evaluated its affect using Avy - a SAT-based model checking algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2014.6987601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2014.6987601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We present a method for interpolation based on DRUP proofs. Interpolants are widely used in model checking, synthesis and other applications. Most interpolation algorithms rely on a resolution proof produced by a SAT-solver for unsatisfaible formulas. The proof is traversed and translated into an interpolant by replacing resolution steps with AND and OR gates. This process is efficient (once there is a proof) and generates interpolants that are linear in the size of the proof. In this paper, we address three known weakness of this approach: (i) performance degradation experienced by the SAT-solver and the extra memory requirements needed when logging a resolution proof; (ii) the proof generated by the solver is not necessarily the "best" proof for interpolantion, and (iii) combining proof logging with pre-processing is complicated. We show that these issues can be remedied by using DRUP proofs. First, we show how to produce an interpolant from a DRUP proof, even when pre-processing is enabled. Second, we give a novel interpolation algorithm that produces interpolants partially in CNF. Third, we show how DRUP proof can be restructured on-the-fly to yield better interpolants. We implemented our DRUP-based interpolation framework in MiniSAT, and evaluated its affect using Avy - a SAT-based model checking algorithm.