基于0.25 μm InP DHBT技术的154-GHz静态分压器

N. Phan, D. Sawdai, B. Oyama, P. Chang, D. Scott, A. Gutierrez-Aitken, A. Oki
{"title":"基于0.25 μm InP DHBT技术的154-GHz静态分压器","authors":"N. Phan, D. Sawdai, B. Oyama, P. Chang, D. Scott, A. Gutierrez-Aitken, A. Oki","doi":"10.1109/DRC.2006.305058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Static dividers are well recognized performance benchmarks for mixed-signal technologies. We report an emitter-coupled logic (ECL) static divider with a maximum operating frequency of 154.75 GHz. The same divider was demonstrated to operate down at 5 GHz at the same bias, dissipating 222.11 mW. The circuit was fabricated in a high performance 0.25-pm InP DHBT technology withfT> 300 GHz andfmax > 450 GHz. We discuss device, processing, and circuit design. The InP/InGaAs/InP double HBTs were grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. The HBT layer structure includes an InP emitter, a 300-A compositionally graded InGaAs base doped with beryllium at 8x1019cmM3, and a 1200-A InP collector. After HBT fabrication, the devices were planarized with a spin-on dielectric, and vias were etched down for the emitter, base, and collector contacts. The backend process included thin-film resistors, metal-insulator-metal capacitors, 4 levels of planarized interconnect on low-K dielectric, and optional back-side thinning / vias / metallization. Figure 1 shows the cross-section of a finished HBT with a 0.25-ptm emitter and a segment of a circuit with 4 levels of interconnect. HBTs were fabricated with emitter widths as small as 0.14 ptm; however, scaling effects related to the base contact width caused the 0.25-ptm HBTs to give the best high-frequency performance. Typical current gain (P) is between 20 and 30, and the breakdown voltage (BVCEO) is 4 V. The HBT is designed for peak RF performance at a moderately high JE = 7 mA/ tm2 (see Figure 2). Peak fT 322 GHz occurs at VCB 0.27 V when the collector is partially undepleted for reduced transit time, and peakfmax 459 GHz occurs at VCB 0.78 V when the collector is fully depleted and CBC is minimized. Figure 3 illustrates the major blocks of our static divider. Static divider design in the D-Band regime poses many challenges. First, transistors operating at such high frequencies in ECL topologies are prone to oscillation. Next, the time constants at the latch load nodes can limit high-speed performance. Capacitances from conventional, transistor current sources begin to become limiting time constants as well. The interface circuitry to and from the actual divider core must be carefully designed to not mask core performance. Input reflections and circuit bandwidth make it challenging for the input path to provide adequate power and slew rate to switch the core. Today, D-Band sources are single-ended, where headroom can also limit the maximum signal level delivered to the core. The divider core output must contend with the parasitic capacitance of the feedback path as well as the loading of subsequent output stages. Employing high bandwidth circuit techniques can sometimes be detrimental to low frequency performance, further exacerbating the challenge of static divider design. Finally, power must be considered for practical systems. Each of the mentioned challenges was addressed in the divider design. The divider was stabilized by covering most of the circuit with a ground plane. We found it to be a more optimal tradeoff between stability and bandwidth compared to other techniques, such as inserting damping resistors at base terminals. Inductive peaking was used to improve the time constant at the latch load nodes. Resistors were used for all current sources in the circuit to reduce current source capacitance. A broadband input matching network was designed and optimized to minimize reflections and maximize power delivered to the divider core. The layout floorplan of the divider core was such that the inter-latch signals are perpendicular to the main divider signal flow, resulting in a relatively short divider feedback interconnect path. Relatively large resistances were inserted between the core and output stages to alleviate core capacitive loading. Careful selection and iterative evaluation of devices, resistors, and inductances was required to achieve simultaneous high and low frequency performance, i.e., static performance. We found emitter resistance to be a key device limiter in static performance. Power can be substantially reduced in a currentsteering latch topology by removing emitter followers (EF). However, this results in non-optimal base-collector biasing of the switching and regenerative latch pairs. Realizing that JE of the EF is the key for high frequency performance, the supply voltage on the EF was reduced while maintaining the same JE. This results in much lower power dissipation than if the EF were biased at the same supply voltage as the switching and regenerative pairs. Divider testing done in the V, W, and D-bands were done with a diode quadrupler or backward-wave oscillator (BWO) and harmonic mixers. A conventional RF signal generator was used for testing at 50 GHz and below. Measured divider performance is illustrated at 154.75 GHz and 5 GHz in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. Our 154.75 GHz device was damaged during testing so we were only able to obtain a sensitivity plot from another site in the same wafer that operated from 10 GHz to 151 GHz (see Figure 6).","PeriodicalId":259981,"journal":{"name":"2006 64th Device Research Conference","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 154-GHz Static Divider in 0.25 μm InP DHBT Technology\",\"authors\":\"N. Phan, D. Sawdai, B. Oyama, P. Chang, D. Scott, A. Gutierrez-Aitken, A. Oki\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DRC.2006.305058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Static dividers are well recognized performance benchmarks for mixed-signal technologies. We report an emitter-coupled logic (ECL) static divider with a maximum operating frequency of 154.75 GHz. The same divider was demonstrated to operate down at 5 GHz at the same bias, dissipating 222.11 mW. The circuit was fabricated in a high performance 0.25-pm InP DHBT technology withfT> 300 GHz andfmax > 450 GHz. We discuss device, processing, and circuit design. The InP/InGaAs/InP double HBTs were grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. The HBT layer structure includes an InP emitter, a 300-A compositionally graded InGaAs base doped with beryllium at 8x1019cmM3, and a 1200-A InP collector. After HBT fabrication, the devices were planarized with a spin-on dielectric, and vias were etched down for the emitter, base, and collector contacts. The backend process included thin-film resistors, metal-insulator-metal capacitors, 4 levels of planarized interconnect on low-K dielectric, and optional back-side thinning / vias / metallization. Figure 1 shows the cross-section of a finished HBT with a 0.25-ptm emitter and a segment of a circuit with 4 levels of interconnect. HBTs were fabricated with emitter widths as small as 0.14 ptm; however, scaling effects related to the base contact width caused the 0.25-ptm HBTs to give the best high-frequency performance. Typical current gain (P) is between 20 and 30, and the breakdown voltage (BVCEO) is 4 V. The HBT is designed for peak RF performance at a moderately high JE = 7 mA/ tm2 (see Figure 2). Peak fT 322 GHz occurs at VCB 0.27 V when the collector is partially undepleted for reduced transit time, and peakfmax 459 GHz occurs at VCB 0.78 V when the collector is fully depleted and CBC is minimized. Figure 3 illustrates the major blocks of our static divider. Static divider design in the D-Band regime poses many challenges. First, transistors operating at such high frequencies in ECL topologies are prone to oscillation. Next, the time constants at the latch load nodes can limit high-speed performance. Capacitances from conventional, transistor current sources begin to become limiting time constants as well. The interface circuitry to and from the actual divider core must be carefully designed to not mask core performance. Input reflections and circuit bandwidth make it challenging for the input path to provide adequate power and slew rate to switch the core. Today, D-Band sources are single-ended, where headroom can also limit the maximum signal level delivered to the core. The divider core output must contend with the parasitic capacitance of the feedback path as well as the loading of subsequent output stages. Employing high bandwidth circuit techniques can sometimes be detrimental to low frequency performance, further exacerbating the challenge of static divider design. Finally, power must be considered for practical systems. Each of the mentioned challenges was addressed in the divider design. The divider was stabilized by covering most of the circuit with a ground plane. We found it to be a more optimal tradeoff between stability and bandwidth compared to other techniques, such as inserting damping resistors at base terminals. Inductive peaking was used to improve the time constant at the latch load nodes. Resistors were used for all current sources in the circuit to reduce current source capacitance. A broadband input matching network was designed and optimized to minimize reflections and maximize power delivered to the divider core. The layout floorplan of the divider core was such that the inter-latch signals are perpendicular to the main divider signal flow, resulting in a relatively short divider feedback interconnect path. Relatively large resistances were inserted between the core and output stages to alleviate core capacitive loading. Careful selection and iterative evaluation of devices, resistors, and inductances was required to achieve simultaneous high and low frequency performance, i.e., static performance. We found emitter resistance to be a key device limiter in static performance. Power can be substantially reduced in a currentsteering latch topology by removing emitter followers (EF). However, this results in non-optimal base-collector biasing of the switching and regenerative latch pairs. Realizing that JE of the EF is the key for high frequency performance, the supply voltage on the EF was reduced while maintaining the same JE. This results in much lower power dissipation than if the EF were biased at the same supply voltage as the switching and regenerative pairs. Divider testing done in the V, W, and D-bands were done with a diode quadrupler or backward-wave oscillator (BWO) and harmonic mixers. A conventional RF signal generator was used for testing at 50 GHz and below. Measured divider performance is illustrated at 154.75 GHz and 5 GHz in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. Our 154.75 GHz device was damaged during testing so we were only able to obtain a sensitivity plot from another site in the same wafer that operated from 10 GHz to 151 GHz (see Figure 6).\",\"PeriodicalId\":259981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 64th Device Research Conference\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 64th Device Research Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.2006.305058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 64th Device Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.2006.305058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

静态分频器是混合信号技术公认的性能基准。我们报道了一个最大工作频率为154.75 GHz的发射器耦合逻辑(ECL)静态分频器。同样的分压器被证明在相同的偏置下工作在5 GHz,耗散222.11 mW。该电路采用高性能0.25 pm InP DHBT技术,ft > 300 GHz, fmax > 450 GHz。我们讨论了器件、处理和电路设计。采用固体源分子束外延法制备了InP/InGaAs/InP双HBTs。HBT层结构包括一个InP发射极,一个300-A掺杂铍的8x1019cmM3的InGaAs基底和一个1200-A的InP集热器。在HBT制造完成后,用自旋介电介质将器件平面化,并蚀刻出用于发射极、基极和集电极触点的通孔。后端工艺包括薄膜电阻,金属-绝缘体-金属电容器,低k介电介质上的4级平面互连,以及可选的背面薄化/过孔/金属化。图1显示了带有0.25 ptm发射极的成品HBT和具有4级互连的电路段的横截面。制备了发射极宽度小至0.14 ptm的HBTs;然而,与基极接触宽度相关的缩放效应导致0.25 ptm的hbt具有最佳的高频性能。典型的电流增益(P)在20到30之间,击穿电压(BVCEO)为4 V。HBT设计用于在中等高JE = 7 mA/ tm2时的峰值射频性能(见图2)。当集电极部分未耗尽以减少传输时间时,峰值f322 GHz出现在VCB 0.27 V,峰值f459 GHz出现在VCB 0.78 V,当集电极完全耗尽且CBC最小时。图3说明了静态分压器的主要模块。d波段静态分频器的设计面临许多挑战。首先,在ECL拓扑结构中以如此高的频率工作的晶体管容易产生振荡。其次,锁存负载节点的时间常数会限制高速性能。传统的晶体管电流源的电容也开始成为限制时间常数。与实际分压器核心之间的接口电路必须仔细设计,以免掩盖核心性能。输入反射和电路带宽使得输入路径难以提供足够的功率和压摆率来切换核心。目前,d波段信号源是单端,其净空也会限制传递到核心的最大信号电平。分压器核心输出必须与反馈路径的寄生电容以及后续输出级的负载相抗衡。采用高带宽电路技术有时会损害低频性能,进一步加剧了静态分频器设计的挑战。最后,必须考虑实际系统的功率。上述每个挑战都在分压器设计中得到了解决。用接地平面覆盖大部分电路来稳定分压器。我们发现,与其他技术(如在基端插入阻尼电阻)相比,它是稳定性和带宽之间的最佳权衡。利用感应峰值提高锁存负载节点的时间常数。电路中所有电流源均采用电阻器,以减小电流源电容。设计并优化了宽带输入匹配网络,使反射最小化,输出功率最大化。分频器核心的布局平面图是这样的,内部锁存器信号垂直于主分频器信号流,导致一个相对较短的分频器反馈互连路径。在铁心和输出级之间插入了较大的电阻,以减轻铁心的容性负载。为了同时实现高频和低频性能,即静态性能,需要仔细选择和迭代评估器件、电阻和电感。我们发现发射极电阻是限制器件静态性能的关键因素。通过去除发射器跟随器(EF),可以大大降低电流控制锁存器拓扑中的功率。然而,这会导致开关和再生锁存器对的非最优基极集电极偏置。意识到EF的JE是高频性能的关键,在保持相同JE的情况下降低了EF上的电源电压。如果EF偏置在与开关和再生对相同的电源电压下,则功耗要低得多。在V, W和d波段进行的分频测试是用二极管四倍频器或反向波振荡器(BWO)和谐波混频器完成的。传统的射频信号发生器用于50 GHz及以下的测试。测得的分频器性能分别在154.75 GHz和5 GHz下如图4和图5所示。我们的154。 75 GHz器件在测试过程中损坏,因此我们只能从同一晶圆上的另一个位置获得从10 GHz到151 GHz的灵敏度图(见图6)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A 154-GHz Static Divider in 0.25 μm InP DHBT Technology
Static dividers are well recognized performance benchmarks for mixed-signal technologies. We report an emitter-coupled logic (ECL) static divider with a maximum operating frequency of 154.75 GHz. The same divider was demonstrated to operate down at 5 GHz at the same bias, dissipating 222.11 mW. The circuit was fabricated in a high performance 0.25-pm InP DHBT technology withfT> 300 GHz andfmax > 450 GHz. We discuss device, processing, and circuit design. The InP/InGaAs/InP double HBTs were grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. The HBT layer structure includes an InP emitter, a 300-A compositionally graded InGaAs base doped with beryllium at 8x1019cmM3, and a 1200-A InP collector. After HBT fabrication, the devices were planarized with a spin-on dielectric, and vias were etched down for the emitter, base, and collector contacts. The backend process included thin-film resistors, metal-insulator-metal capacitors, 4 levels of planarized interconnect on low-K dielectric, and optional back-side thinning / vias / metallization. Figure 1 shows the cross-section of a finished HBT with a 0.25-ptm emitter and a segment of a circuit with 4 levels of interconnect. HBTs were fabricated with emitter widths as small as 0.14 ptm; however, scaling effects related to the base contact width caused the 0.25-ptm HBTs to give the best high-frequency performance. Typical current gain (P) is between 20 and 30, and the breakdown voltage (BVCEO) is 4 V. The HBT is designed for peak RF performance at a moderately high JE = 7 mA/ tm2 (see Figure 2). Peak fT 322 GHz occurs at VCB 0.27 V when the collector is partially undepleted for reduced transit time, and peakfmax 459 GHz occurs at VCB 0.78 V when the collector is fully depleted and CBC is minimized. Figure 3 illustrates the major blocks of our static divider. Static divider design in the D-Band regime poses many challenges. First, transistors operating at such high frequencies in ECL topologies are prone to oscillation. Next, the time constants at the latch load nodes can limit high-speed performance. Capacitances from conventional, transistor current sources begin to become limiting time constants as well. The interface circuitry to and from the actual divider core must be carefully designed to not mask core performance. Input reflections and circuit bandwidth make it challenging for the input path to provide adequate power and slew rate to switch the core. Today, D-Band sources are single-ended, where headroom can also limit the maximum signal level delivered to the core. The divider core output must contend with the parasitic capacitance of the feedback path as well as the loading of subsequent output stages. Employing high bandwidth circuit techniques can sometimes be detrimental to low frequency performance, further exacerbating the challenge of static divider design. Finally, power must be considered for practical systems. Each of the mentioned challenges was addressed in the divider design. The divider was stabilized by covering most of the circuit with a ground plane. We found it to be a more optimal tradeoff between stability and bandwidth compared to other techniques, such as inserting damping resistors at base terminals. Inductive peaking was used to improve the time constant at the latch load nodes. Resistors were used for all current sources in the circuit to reduce current source capacitance. A broadband input matching network was designed and optimized to minimize reflections and maximize power delivered to the divider core. The layout floorplan of the divider core was such that the inter-latch signals are perpendicular to the main divider signal flow, resulting in a relatively short divider feedback interconnect path. Relatively large resistances were inserted between the core and output stages to alleviate core capacitive loading. Careful selection and iterative evaluation of devices, resistors, and inductances was required to achieve simultaneous high and low frequency performance, i.e., static performance. We found emitter resistance to be a key device limiter in static performance. Power can be substantially reduced in a currentsteering latch topology by removing emitter followers (EF). However, this results in non-optimal base-collector biasing of the switching and regenerative latch pairs. Realizing that JE of the EF is the key for high frequency performance, the supply voltage on the EF was reduced while maintaining the same JE. This results in much lower power dissipation than if the EF were biased at the same supply voltage as the switching and regenerative pairs. Divider testing done in the V, W, and D-bands were done with a diode quadrupler or backward-wave oscillator (BWO) and harmonic mixers. A conventional RF signal generator was used for testing at 50 GHz and below. Measured divider performance is illustrated at 154.75 GHz and 5 GHz in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. Our 154.75 GHz device was damaged during testing so we were only able to obtain a sensitivity plot from another site in the same wafer that operated from 10 GHz to 151 GHz (see Figure 6).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信