Jordyn Dennis, C. Grady, S. Rajtmajer
{"title":"Comparative assessment of cyber-physical threats to megacities","authors":"Jordyn Dennis, C. Grady, S. Rajtmajer","doi":"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By 2030, forecasts suggest that urban areas will house 60 percent of the world’s population and one in every three people will live in cities with at least half a million inhabitants. Within the same time frame, the number of global megacities is expected to jump from 33 today to 43 in 2030 [1]. Underpinning these large urban areas will be an interconnected network of critical physical infrastructures reliant on Internet-connected Industrial Control Systems and susceptible to increasingly sophisticated, e.g., AI-enabled, cyber threats. In hand, the cyber threat landscape is shifting rapidly. We are seeing a sharp rise in the number of cyberattacks on critical infrastructure [2] with significant impacts cascading across multiple sectors and causing disruption to the provisioning of essential goods and services. Security scholars suggest that these impacts are not always equitable and that disruption to critical infrastructure can affect vulnerable groups differently [3], which further emphasizes the need to improve cybersecurity between critical infrastructure sectors [4]. Through structured analysis of city statistics, demographic information, cyber incidents, and current cyber policy, our presentation will articulate potential social implications of megacity growth through the lens of cyber-physical infrastructure disruption. We investigate the largest 15 megacities in the world and find that megacities continue to grow in population but not in cyber policy. We highlight recent examples of cyber-physical disruption in Mumbai and New York City with focus on implications for vulnerable populations. Our work suggests the need for future research on social responsibility regarding security of these critical infrastructure sectors and on the need for technology-focused law, policy, and regulation guidelines.","PeriodicalId":314239,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测显示,到2030年,城市地区将容纳全球60%的人口,每三个人中就有一个居住在至少有50万居民的城市。在同一时间段内,全球特大城市的数量预计将从目前的33个增加到2030年的43个[1]。支撑这些大型城市地区的将是一个依赖于互联网连接的工业控制系统的关键物理基础设施的互联网络,并容易受到日益复杂的网络威胁的影响,例如人工智能支持的网络威胁。目前,网络威胁形势正在迅速变化。我们看到,针对关键基础设施的网络攻击数量急剧上升[2],对多个部门产生了重大影响,并导致基本商品和服务的供应中断。安全学者认为,这些影响并不总是公平的,关键基础设施的中断会对弱势群体产生不同的影响[3],这进一步强调了提高关键基础设施部门之间网络安全的必要性[4]。通过对城市统计数据、人口信息、网络事件和当前网络政策的结构化分析,我们的演讲将通过网络物理基础设施中断的视角阐明特大城市增长的潜在社会影响。我们调查了世界上最大的15个特大城市,发现特大城市的人口在持续增长,但网络政策却没有增长。我们重点介绍了最近发生在孟买和纽约的网络物理破坏案例,重点关注对弱势群体的影响。我们的工作表明,未来需要对这些关键基础设施部门的安全方面的社会责任进行研究,并需要制定以技术为重点的法律、政策和监管指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative assessment of cyber-physical threats to megacities
By 2030, forecasts suggest that urban areas will house 60 percent of the world’s population and one in every three people will live in cities with at least half a million inhabitants. Within the same time frame, the number of global megacities is expected to jump from 33 today to 43 in 2030 [1]. Underpinning these large urban areas will be an interconnected network of critical physical infrastructures reliant on Internet-connected Industrial Control Systems and susceptible to increasingly sophisticated, e.g., AI-enabled, cyber threats. In hand, the cyber threat landscape is shifting rapidly. We are seeing a sharp rise in the number of cyberattacks on critical infrastructure [2] with significant impacts cascading across multiple sectors and causing disruption to the provisioning of essential goods and services. Security scholars suggest that these impacts are not always equitable and that disruption to critical infrastructure can affect vulnerable groups differently [3], which further emphasizes the need to improve cybersecurity between critical infrastructure sectors [4]. Through structured analysis of city statistics, demographic information, cyber incidents, and current cyber policy, our presentation will articulate potential social implications of megacity growth through the lens of cyber-physical infrastructure disruption. We investigate the largest 15 megacities in the world and find that megacities continue to grow in population but not in cyber policy. We highlight recent examples of cyber-physical disruption in Mumbai and New York City with focus on implications for vulnerable populations. Our work suggests the need for future research on social responsibility regarding security of these critical infrastructure sectors and on the need for technology-focused law, policy, and regulation guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信