不同再矿化剂对正畸支架预处理牙釉质表面力学、光学和表面变化的评价

Nesma M. Khater, Reham M Abdallah, M. Osman
{"title":"不同再矿化剂对正畸支架预处理牙釉质表面力学、光学和表面变化的评价","authors":"Nesma M. Khater, Reham M Abdallah, M. Osman","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2021.199974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CPP-ACP, CPP-ACPF and nano-hydroxyapatite on enamel remineralization during fixed Orthodontic treatment. The treated specimens with different remineralizing agents were compared with their untreated and demineralized ones regarding surface roughness, surface microhardness, and color measurement. Materials and methods: A total number of 120 specimens from extracted orthodontic patient teeth was collected and divided into 4 equal groups (10 specimens each) according to the enamel surface treatment applied immediately after PH cycling; group A received no surface treatment and served as a control group. In group B, the enamel surface was treated by CPP-ACP, while group C enamel surface was treated by CPP-ACFP, and group D was treated by Desensibilize NanoP. The surface roughness was obtained using surface Profilometer and Vickers microhardness was measured using Digital Display Vickers Microhardness Tester. Evaluation for each specimen was performed before, after pH cycling and after using different remineralizing agents. The color change was analyzed for each specimen in different groups under the Spectrophotometer. The change in color from control specimens compared to the color of the demineralized specimens (ΔE1), the difference in color between control specimens and after remineralization (ΔE2) and the change in color between demineralized and remineralized specimens (ΔE3) were calculated. The results were then statistically analyzed and compared using ANOVA and LSD test at level of significance 0.05. Results: The use of CPP-ACP, CCP-ACFP and NanoP significantly improved surface roughness, surface microhardness especially with NanoP with non-significant difference between the three remineralizing materials. NanoP exhibited the lowest change in color compared with CPP-ACFP and CPP-ACP paste. Conclusion: The use of CPP-ACP, CPP-ACFP and NanoP could be used as preventive materials during orthodontic treatment and be effective in repairing the demineralized enamel restoring its surface smoothness, hardness, and color.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Mechanical, Optical and Surface Changes of Pretreated Enamel Surface Bonded to Orthodontic Bracket Using Different Remineralizing Agents\",\"authors\":\"Nesma M. Khater, Reham M Abdallah, M. Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/mjd.2021.199974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CPP-ACP, CPP-ACPF and nano-hydroxyapatite on enamel remineralization during fixed Orthodontic treatment. The treated specimens with different remineralizing agents were compared with their untreated and demineralized ones regarding surface roughness, surface microhardness, and color measurement. Materials and methods: A total number of 120 specimens from extracted orthodontic patient teeth was collected and divided into 4 equal groups (10 specimens each) according to the enamel surface treatment applied immediately after PH cycling; group A received no surface treatment and served as a control group. In group B, the enamel surface was treated by CPP-ACP, while group C enamel surface was treated by CPP-ACFP, and group D was treated by Desensibilize NanoP. The surface roughness was obtained using surface Profilometer and Vickers microhardness was measured using Digital Display Vickers Microhardness Tester. Evaluation for each specimen was performed before, after pH cycling and after using different remineralizing agents. The color change was analyzed for each specimen in different groups under the Spectrophotometer. The change in color from control specimens compared to the color of the demineralized specimens (ΔE1), the difference in color between control specimens and after remineralization (ΔE2) and the change in color between demineralized and remineralized specimens (ΔE3) were calculated. The results were then statistically analyzed and compared using ANOVA and LSD test at level of significance 0.05. Results: The use of CPP-ACP, CCP-ACFP and NanoP significantly improved surface roughness, surface microhardness especially with NanoP with non-significant difference between the three remineralizing materials. NanoP exhibited the lowest change in color compared with CPP-ACFP and CPP-ACP paste. Conclusion: The use of CPP-ACP, CPP-ACFP and NanoP could be used as preventive materials during orthodontic treatment and be effective in repairing the demineralized enamel restoring its surface smoothness, hardness, and color.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.199974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.199974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨固定正畸治疗中牙釉质再矿化的影响,探讨磷酸腺苷- acp、磷酸腺苷- acpf和纳米羟基磷灰石对牙釉质再矿化的影响。用不同再矿化剂处理后的样品与未处理和脱矿后的样品在表面粗糙度、表面显微硬度和颜色测量方面进行了比较。材料与方法:收集正畸患者拔牙标本120份,根据PH循环后即刻进行的牙釉质表面处理分为4组,每组10份;A组不进行表面处理,作为对照组。B组牙釉质表面采用CPP-ACP处理,C组牙釉质表面采用CPP-ACFP处理,D组牙釉质表面采用脱敏纳米op处理。用表面轮廓仪测量表面粗糙度,用数显维氏显微硬度计测量维氏显微硬度。在pH循环前后和使用不同的再矿化剂后对每个标本进行评估。在分光光度计下分析各组样品的颜色变化。计算了对照标本与脱矿标本的颜色变化(ΔE1)、对照标本与再矿化后的颜色差异(ΔE2)以及脱矿和再矿化标本的颜色变化(ΔE3)。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和LSD检验,在显著性0.05水平上对结果进行统计学分析和比较。结果:使用CPP-ACP、CCP-ACFP和NanoP后,三种再矿化材料的表面粗糙度、表面显微硬度均有显著提高,其中NanoP的差异无统计学意义。与CPP-ACFP和CPP-ACP膏体相比,NanoP的颜色变化最小。结论:CPP-ACP、CPP-ACFP、NanoP均可作为正畸治疗时的预防材料,可有效修复脱矿牙釉质,恢复牙釉质表面的光滑度、硬度和颜色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Mechanical, Optical and Surface Changes of Pretreated Enamel Surface Bonded to Orthodontic Bracket Using Different Remineralizing Agents
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CPP-ACP, CPP-ACPF and nano-hydroxyapatite on enamel remineralization during fixed Orthodontic treatment. The treated specimens with different remineralizing agents were compared with their untreated and demineralized ones regarding surface roughness, surface microhardness, and color measurement. Materials and methods: A total number of 120 specimens from extracted orthodontic patient teeth was collected and divided into 4 equal groups (10 specimens each) according to the enamel surface treatment applied immediately after PH cycling; group A received no surface treatment and served as a control group. In group B, the enamel surface was treated by CPP-ACP, while group C enamel surface was treated by CPP-ACFP, and group D was treated by Desensibilize NanoP. The surface roughness was obtained using surface Profilometer and Vickers microhardness was measured using Digital Display Vickers Microhardness Tester. Evaluation for each specimen was performed before, after pH cycling and after using different remineralizing agents. The color change was analyzed for each specimen in different groups under the Spectrophotometer. The change in color from control specimens compared to the color of the demineralized specimens (ΔE1), the difference in color between control specimens and after remineralization (ΔE2) and the change in color between demineralized and remineralized specimens (ΔE3) were calculated. The results were then statistically analyzed and compared using ANOVA and LSD test at level of significance 0.05. Results: The use of CPP-ACP, CCP-ACFP and NanoP significantly improved surface roughness, surface microhardness especially with NanoP with non-significant difference between the three remineralizing materials. NanoP exhibited the lowest change in color compared with CPP-ACFP and CPP-ACP paste. Conclusion: The use of CPP-ACP, CPP-ACFP and NanoP could be used as preventive materials during orthodontic treatment and be effective in repairing the demineralized enamel restoring its surface smoothness, hardness, and color.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信