Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury和Ranabir Samaddar(编),南亚的罗兴亚人:没有国家的人

Sariful Islam
{"title":"Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury和Ranabir Samaddar(编),南亚的罗兴亚人:没有国家的人","authors":"Sariful Islam","doi":"10.1177/2393861720950166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"village versus city, leading to dangerous claims such as the annihilation of the village. Even in the Western theory of urban and rural space, the influence of the concept of the city as a lens to view the countryside has been critiqued both at the politico-economic as well as an aesthetic and sensibility starting with Raymond Williams’ work. As Williams’ work focused on the commons and literature written on villages and cities in Britain to show the paucity of the concept of separating the city from the countryside, the author’s work becomes a landmark study in describing this paucity in understanding the rural and urban landscape in India. To summarise, the work addresses the politics of knowledge production as the selection of the language also decides the questions one is choosing to ask, the audience one is speaking to, and the position one elects to enunciate. The author’s work thus creates a different conceptual plain questioning the existing categories of studying space, both urban and rural. While the politics of knowledge production has been acknowledged across different academic forums, the depth and dimension of its loss can only be realised, recovered from, and dealt with in weaving together the concerns and concepts in the vernacular with ethnography.","PeriodicalId":158055,"journal":{"name":"Society and Culture in South Asia","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury and Ranabir Samaddar (eds.), The Rohingya in South Asia: People Without a State\",\"authors\":\"Sariful Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2393861720950166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"village versus city, leading to dangerous claims such as the annihilation of the village. Even in the Western theory of urban and rural space, the influence of the concept of the city as a lens to view the countryside has been critiqued both at the politico-economic as well as an aesthetic and sensibility starting with Raymond Williams’ work. As Williams’ work focused on the commons and literature written on villages and cities in Britain to show the paucity of the concept of separating the city from the countryside, the author’s work becomes a landmark study in describing this paucity in understanding the rural and urban landscape in India. To summarise, the work addresses the politics of knowledge production as the selection of the language also decides the questions one is choosing to ask, the audience one is speaking to, and the position one elects to enunciate. The author’s work thus creates a different conceptual plain questioning the existing categories of studying space, both urban and rural. While the politics of knowledge production has been acknowledged across different academic forums, the depth and dimension of its loss can only be realised, recovered from, and dealt with in weaving together the concerns and concepts in the vernacular with ethnography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society and Culture in South Asia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society and Culture in South Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861720950166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Culture in South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861720950166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

村庄对城市,导致危险的索赔,如村庄的湮灭。即使在西方的城乡空间理论中,以城市为视角观察乡村的概念的影响也受到了政治经济以及美学和感性方面的批评,这始于雷蒙德·威廉姆斯的作品。由于威廉姆斯的作品集中在英国的公地和关于乡村和城市的文学作品上,以显示城市与乡村分离概念的缺乏,作者的作品成为描述这种缺乏理解印度农村和城市景观的里程碑式研究。总而言之,作品解决了知识生产的政治,因为语言的选择也决定了一个人选择问的问题,一个人说话的听众,以及一个人选择阐明的立场。因此,作者的作品创造了一个不同的概念平原,质疑现有的研究空间类别,包括城市和农村。虽然知识生产的政治已经在不同的学术论坛上得到了承认,但其损失的深度和规模只能通过将白话中的关注和概念与民族志结合在一起来实现,从中恢复和处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury and Ranabir Samaddar (eds.), The Rohingya in South Asia: People Without a State
village versus city, leading to dangerous claims such as the annihilation of the village. Even in the Western theory of urban and rural space, the influence of the concept of the city as a lens to view the countryside has been critiqued both at the politico-economic as well as an aesthetic and sensibility starting with Raymond Williams’ work. As Williams’ work focused on the commons and literature written on villages and cities in Britain to show the paucity of the concept of separating the city from the countryside, the author’s work becomes a landmark study in describing this paucity in understanding the rural and urban landscape in India. To summarise, the work addresses the politics of knowledge production as the selection of the language also decides the questions one is choosing to ask, the audience one is speaking to, and the position one elects to enunciate. The author’s work thus creates a different conceptual plain questioning the existing categories of studying space, both urban and rural. While the politics of knowledge production has been acknowledged across different academic forums, the depth and dimension of its loss can only be realised, recovered from, and dealt with in weaving together the concerns and concepts in the vernacular with ethnography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信