英雄与虚无,或者电视与雕塑。Yerbossyn meldibekov的视觉人类学

Andrei N. Fomenko
{"title":"英雄与虚无,或者电视与雕塑。Yerbossyn meldibekov的视觉人类学","authors":"Andrei N. Fomenko","doi":"10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-125-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2001 Meldibekov created the work called Pastan – a video-performance in which the author is being methodically beaten and insulted in the process. Pastan is the first in the series that show four different scenarios involving a humiliated and suffering subject. That character represents regression to some kind of a primary state, assimilation with other living creatures and even inanimate objects. This anthropological and psychological ascesis is in line with the formal treatment of the video-performances, going back to the neo-avant-garde of the 1960s and 1970s. The main medium here is also the body of the artist, almost free of any trappings of sociocultural identity. However, unlike the “classics”, Meldibekov is interested not so much in the boundaries of art as in the boundaries of humanity. In general, his works form a visual anthropology based on two poles. On the one hand, one can see monumental and triumphant forms in which political power is expressing itself, using esthetic mechanisms to rise vainly above the perishable human nature. But ironically, it is these monuments that Meldibekov sees as a symbol of the ephemeral. On the opposite pole one can see something over which power rises, but which inevitably forms its substrate, its perishable flesh, the expendable of history. The character in those video-performances is an antipode to the hero of a monument: he is miserable and unmonumental. But he is much sturdier; he persistently faces the strikes of destiny and is not so easy to break.","PeriodicalId":127301,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE HEROES AND NONENTITIES, OR TELEVISION VERSUS SCULPTURE. YERBOSSYN MELDIBEKOV’S VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"Andrei N. Fomenko\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-125-145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2001 Meldibekov created the work called Pastan – a video-performance in which the author is being methodically beaten and insulted in the process. Pastan is the first in the series that show four different scenarios involving a humiliated and suffering subject. That character represents regression to some kind of a primary state, assimilation with other living creatures and even inanimate objects. This anthropological and psychological ascesis is in line with the formal treatment of the video-performances, going back to the neo-avant-garde of the 1960s and 1970s. The main medium here is also the body of the artist, almost free of any trappings of sociocultural identity. However, unlike the “classics”, Meldibekov is interested not so much in the boundaries of art as in the boundaries of humanity. In general, his works form a visual anthropology based on two poles. On the one hand, one can see monumental and triumphant forms in which political power is expressing itself, using esthetic mechanisms to rise vainly above the perishable human nature. But ironically, it is these monuments that Meldibekov sees as a symbol of the ephemeral. On the opposite pole one can see something over which power rises, but which inevitably forms its substrate, its perishable flesh, the expendable of history. The character in those video-performances is an antipode to the hero of a monument: he is miserable and unmonumental. But he is much sturdier; he persistently faces the strikes of destiny and is not so easy to break.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-125-145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-125-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2001年,梅尔迪别科夫创作了一件名为《Pastan》的作品,这是一种视频表演,在这个过程中,作者被有计划地殴打和侮辱。《Pastan》是该系列中第一个展示四种不同场景的作品,涉及一个受辱和痛苦的主题。这一特征代表着向某种原始状态的回归,与其他生物甚至无生命物体的同化。这种人类学和心理学上的苦行与对录像表演的正式处理是一致的,可以追溯到上世纪六七十年代的新前卫艺术。这里的主要媒介也是艺术家的身体,几乎没有任何社会文化身份的束缚。然而,与“经典”不同的是,梅尔迪别科夫对艺术边界的兴趣不如对人类边界的兴趣。总的来说,他的作品构成了一个基于两极的视觉人类学。一方面,人们可以看到政治权力表达自己的不朽和胜利的形式,利用审美机制,徒劳地超越易逝的人性。但具有讽刺意味的是,正是这些纪念碑被梅尔迪别科夫视为短暂的象征。在另一极,人们可以看到某种东西,权力在它上面崛起,但它不可避免地成为权力的基础,成为权力易逝的肉体,成为历史的牺牲品。这些视频表演中的角色与纪念碑上的英雄截然相反:他是悲惨的,没有纪念意义。但是他要坚强得多;他顽强地面对命运的打击,不那么容易被击垮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE HEROES AND NONENTITIES, OR TELEVISION VERSUS SCULPTURE. YERBOSSYN MELDIBEKOV’S VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY
In 2001 Meldibekov created the work called Pastan – a video-performance in which the author is being methodically beaten and insulted in the process. Pastan is the first in the series that show four different scenarios involving a humiliated and suffering subject. That character represents regression to some kind of a primary state, assimilation with other living creatures and even inanimate objects. This anthropological and psychological ascesis is in line with the formal treatment of the video-performances, going back to the neo-avant-garde of the 1960s and 1970s. The main medium here is also the body of the artist, almost free of any trappings of sociocultural identity. However, unlike the “classics”, Meldibekov is interested not so much in the boundaries of art as in the boundaries of humanity. In general, his works form a visual anthropology based on two poles. On the one hand, one can see monumental and triumphant forms in which political power is expressing itself, using esthetic mechanisms to rise vainly above the perishable human nature. But ironically, it is these monuments that Meldibekov sees as a symbol of the ephemeral. On the opposite pole one can see something over which power rises, but which inevitably forms its substrate, its perishable flesh, the expendable of history. The character in those video-performances is an antipode to the hero of a monument: he is miserable and unmonumental. But he is much sturdier; he persistently faces the strikes of destiny and is not so easy to break.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信