失业和通货膨胀对印度经济增长的影响

J. Sinha
{"title":"失业和通货膨胀对印度经济增长的影响","authors":"J. Sinha","doi":"10.47509/jdef.2022.v03i02.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of unemployment and inflation on the output growth of India over the period 1990 -2021 have been examined in this paper. The method of Panel Unit Root test; Panel Cointegration test; Mean Group and Pooled Mean group test; were applied in this study. The study provides evidence of having up to four co-integrating relationships among the variables applied and has not suffered from serial correlation, heteroscedasticity, and multicollinearity to carry out the stability of the estimated coefficients using the cumovulative sum (CUSUM) of recursive residuals. The logarithm of capital stock and investment in human capital (HUCAP) have a significantly stimulating impact on the logarithm of output in India in the long run. The result shows that a one percent increase in capital stock is liable to increase the real gross domestic by 0.154% in the long run, while a unit increase in human capital investment is susceptible to increasing real GDP by 0.002% in the long run, assuming all other factors are held constant. The inflation rate, however, has a depressing impact on real GDP in India. A 1% increase in inflation is liable to reduce real GDP by 0.004% in the long run. The results have also shown that unemployment (UNEMPL) has no significant impact on the logarithm of real GDP in the long run as it has a greater significance level. The short-run results have shown that if the log real GDP deviates from its long-run, it recovers over 32% in one year. Results indicate that inflation significantly depresses economic performance in India because of uncertainty and reduces investment, employment, and consequently output. Unemployment has not significantly impacted real GDP in India, the reasons being the use of a log of real GDP, the nature of the regression model applied, and controlling for the possible impact of human capital and physical capital. Investment in physical capital and human capital has significantly promoted economic performance in India because investment in human capital improves the productivity of the labor forces and hence increases output and investment in physical capital increases the amount of capital per unit of labor and these have the potency of increasing productivity per worker. The overall effect is an increase in output and therefore economic performance. Unemployment is caused by various reasons but the main causes are the high growth rate of the population; the lack of job opportunities; and the inefficiencies of the public sector. The Government of India may focus on creating a proper environment for the private sector to create jobs and increase job opportunities; and modernization of the agriculture sector through its strategies and resources that include attracting foreign investors.","PeriodicalId":441554,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS AND FINANCE","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPACT OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND INFLATION ON THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF INDIA\",\"authors\":\"J. Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.47509/jdef.2022.v03i02.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effects of unemployment and inflation on the output growth of India over the period 1990 -2021 have been examined in this paper. The method of Panel Unit Root test; Panel Cointegration test; Mean Group and Pooled Mean group test; were applied in this study. The study provides evidence of having up to four co-integrating relationships among the variables applied and has not suffered from serial correlation, heteroscedasticity, and multicollinearity to carry out the stability of the estimated coefficients using the cumovulative sum (CUSUM) of recursive residuals. The logarithm of capital stock and investment in human capital (HUCAP) have a significantly stimulating impact on the logarithm of output in India in the long run. The result shows that a one percent increase in capital stock is liable to increase the real gross domestic by 0.154% in the long run, while a unit increase in human capital investment is susceptible to increasing real GDP by 0.002% in the long run, assuming all other factors are held constant. The inflation rate, however, has a depressing impact on real GDP in India. A 1% increase in inflation is liable to reduce real GDP by 0.004% in the long run. The results have also shown that unemployment (UNEMPL) has no significant impact on the logarithm of real GDP in the long run as it has a greater significance level. The short-run results have shown that if the log real GDP deviates from its long-run, it recovers over 32% in one year. Results indicate that inflation significantly depresses economic performance in India because of uncertainty and reduces investment, employment, and consequently output. Unemployment has not significantly impacted real GDP in India, the reasons being the use of a log of real GDP, the nature of the regression model applied, and controlling for the possible impact of human capital and physical capital. Investment in physical capital and human capital has significantly promoted economic performance in India because investment in human capital improves the productivity of the labor forces and hence increases output and investment in physical capital increases the amount of capital per unit of labor and these have the potency of increasing productivity per worker. The overall effect is an increase in output and therefore economic performance. Unemployment is caused by various reasons but the main causes are the high growth rate of the population; the lack of job opportunities; and the inefficiencies of the public sector. The Government of India may focus on creating a proper environment for the private sector to create jobs and increase job opportunities; and modernization of the agriculture sector through its strategies and resources that include attracting foreign investors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS AND FINANCE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS AND FINANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47509/jdef.2022.v03i02.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS AND FINANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47509/jdef.2022.v03i02.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了1990 -2021年期间失业和通货膨胀对印度产出增长的影响。面板单位根检验法;面板协整检验;平均组和混合平均组检验;应用于本研究。该研究提供的证据表明,所应用的变量之间存在多达四个协整关系,并且没有遭受序列相关,异方差和多重共线性的影响,从而使用递归残差的累积和(CUSUM)来实现估计系数的稳定性。从长期来看,资本存量和人力资本投资(HUCAP)的对数对印度产出的对数具有显著的刺激作用。结果表明,在所有其他因素保持不变的情况下,资本存量增加1%可能会使实际国内生产总值长期增长0.154%,而人力资本投资单位增加可能会使实际国内生产总值长期增长0.002%。然而,通货膨胀率对印度的实际GDP产生了令人沮丧的影响。从长远来看,1%的通货膨胀会导致实际GDP下降0.004%。结果还表明,失业(UNEMPL)对长期实际GDP的对数没有显著影响,因为它具有更大的显著性水平。短期结果表明,如果对数实际GDP偏离其长期,它将在一年内恢复32%以上。结果表明,由于不确定性,通货膨胀显著抑制了印度的经济表现,并减少了投资、就业,从而减少了产出。失业并没有显著影响印度的实际GDP,原因是使用了实际GDP的对数,所应用的回归模型的性质,并控制了人力资本和物质资本的可能影响。对物质资本和人力资本的投资极大地促进了印度的经济表现,因为对人力资本的投资提高了劳动力的生产率,从而增加了产出,对物质资本的投资增加了每单位劳动力的资本数量,这些都有提高每工人生产率的潜力。总体效果是增加产出,从而提高经济绩效。失业是由多种原因造成的,但主要原因是人口的高增长率;缺乏就业机会;以及公共部门的低效率。印度政府可侧重于为私营部门创造创造就业和增加就业机会的适当环境;以及通过包括吸引外国投资者在内的战略和资源实现农业现代化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPACT OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND INFLATION ON THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF INDIA
The effects of unemployment and inflation on the output growth of India over the period 1990 -2021 have been examined in this paper. The method of Panel Unit Root test; Panel Cointegration test; Mean Group and Pooled Mean group test; were applied in this study. The study provides evidence of having up to four co-integrating relationships among the variables applied and has not suffered from serial correlation, heteroscedasticity, and multicollinearity to carry out the stability of the estimated coefficients using the cumovulative sum (CUSUM) of recursive residuals. The logarithm of capital stock and investment in human capital (HUCAP) have a significantly stimulating impact on the logarithm of output in India in the long run. The result shows that a one percent increase in capital stock is liable to increase the real gross domestic by 0.154% in the long run, while a unit increase in human capital investment is susceptible to increasing real GDP by 0.002% in the long run, assuming all other factors are held constant. The inflation rate, however, has a depressing impact on real GDP in India. A 1% increase in inflation is liable to reduce real GDP by 0.004% in the long run. The results have also shown that unemployment (UNEMPL) has no significant impact on the logarithm of real GDP in the long run as it has a greater significance level. The short-run results have shown that if the log real GDP deviates from its long-run, it recovers over 32% in one year. Results indicate that inflation significantly depresses economic performance in India because of uncertainty and reduces investment, employment, and consequently output. Unemployment has not significantly impacted real GDP in India, the reasons being the use of a log of real GDP, the nature of the regression model applied, and controlling for the possible impact of human capital and physical capital. Investment in physical capital and human capital has significantly promoted economic performance in India because investment in human capital improves the productivity of the labor forces and hence increases output and investment in physical capital increases the amount of capital per unit of labor and these have the potency of increasing productivity per worker. The overall effect is an increase in output and therefore economic performance. Unemployment is caused by various reasons but the main causes are the high growth rate of the population; the lack of job opportunities; and the inefficiencies of the public sector. The Government of India may focus on creating a proper environment for the private sector to create jobs and increase job opportunities; and modernization of the agriculture sector through its strategies and resources that include attracting foreign investors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信