C. Arnold, T. Davis, A. Rademaker, J. Morris, G. Mills
{"title":"B11:利用粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)维持农村社区卫生诊所年度结直肠癌筛查","authors":"C. Arnold, T. Davis, A. Rademaker, J. Morris, G. Mills","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, can be significantly reduced if it is detected early. Although overall CRC screening rates have increased significantly, disparities persist among low-income individuals, adults with low literacy, and those living in rural areas. These groups all have screening completion rates below 50%. Objectives: To assess patient knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy about CRC screening and compare the effectiveness of two health literacy informed telephone follow-up strategies to improve annual screening over a three-year period with fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in rural community clinics. Methods: A two-arm, randomized controlled trial is being implemented in four community clinics. Clinics reported CRC baseline screening rates of 3% to 5%. Eligible patients, age 50-75, were recruited at the clinic prior to a scheduled appointment. A research assistant (RA) conducted a baseline structured interview measuring CRC screening knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy. The RA then recommended screening and gave brief literacy and culturally appropriate education using a pamphlet (4 th -grade level), the FIT kit with preaddressed envelope, simplified instructions (3 rd -grade level), and a demonstration of how to use it. At four weeks patients who had not returned their kit received either 1) a personal follow-up call (PC) from a central prevention coordinator using motivational interviewing skills and reminding them to complete and mail FIT kits, or 2) an automated follow-up call (AC) using plain language and motivational messages encouraging patients to complete and mail the FIT. Outcomes include FIT completion after intervention, and again at 12 and 24 months. Results: 620 patients not up to date with screening were enrolled: 64% African American, 56% women, 40% inadequate literacy. Although 90% reported having heard of CRC, only 64% knew a test to check for CRC. 70% reported that a provider had recommended CRC screening in the past and 91% reported they would want to know if they have CRC. Self-efficacy was high, with over 90% indicating they would return the kit to the lab. Screening results: 620 patients enrolled (AC: n=308 / PC: n=306); 418 (68%) completed tests (AC: n=213 (69%) / PC: n=205 (67%)). Follow-up calls for unreturned kits--AC: 124 (40%) people called--29 returned FIT (9.4% of people called completed FIT). PC: 127 (41%) people called--26 returned FIT (9.4% of people called completed FIT). 2 nd -year screening: 255 second kits mailed out to date (AC: n=128/PC: n=125); 98 (38.5%) completed tests (AC: n=49 (38%) / PC: n=49 (39%)). Follow-up calls for unreturned kits--AC: 89 (70%) people called—19 returned FIT (14.8% of people called completed FIT). PC: 82 (66%) people called—17 returned FIT (13.6% of people called completed FIT). Discussion: Implementing health literacy influenced CRC education, and screening strategies using the FIT and phone reminders dramatically increased FIT completion in rural community clinics. The less costly and time-consuming automated call was equally effective as a personal call. Citation Format: Connie L. Arnold, Terry C. Davis, Alfred Rademaker, James Morris, Glenn Mills. Sustaining annual colorectal cancer screening in rural community health clinics using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B11.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract B11: Sustaining annual colorectal cancer screening in rural community health clinics using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT)\",\"authors\":\"C. Arnold, T. Davis, A. Rademaker, J. Morris, G. Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, can be significantly reduced if it is detected early. Although overall CRC screening rates have increased significantly, disparities persist among low-income individuals, adults with low literacy, and those living in rural areas. These groups all have screening completion rates below 50%. Objectives: To assess patient knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy about CRC screening and compare the effectiveness of two health literacy informed telephone follow-up strategies to improve annual screening over a three-year period with fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in rural community clinics. Methods: A two-arm, randomized controlled trial is being implemented in four community clinics. Clinics reported CRC baseline screening rates of 3% to 5%. Eligible patients, age 50-75, were recruited at the clinic prior to a scheduled appointment. A research assistant (RA) conducted a baseline structured interview measuring CRC screening knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy. The RA then recommended screening and gave brief literacy and culturally appropriate education using a pamphlet (4 th -grade level), the FIT kit with preaddressed envelope, simplified instructions (3 rd -grade level), and a demonstration of how to use it. At four weeks patients who had not returned their kit received either 1) a personal follow-up call (PC) from a central prevention coordinator using motivational interviewing skills and reminding them to complete and mail FIT kits, or 2) an automated follow-up call (AC) using plain language and motivational messages encouraging patients to complete and mail the FIT. Outcomes include FIT completion after intervention, and again at 12 and 24 months. Results: 620 patients not up to date with screening were enrolled: 64% African American, 56% women, 40% inadequate literacy. Although 90% reported having heard of CRC, only 64% knew a test to check for CRC. 70% reported that a provider had recommended CRC screening in the past and 91% reported they would want to know if they have CRC. Self-efficacy was high, with over 90% indicating they would return the kit to the lab. Screening results: 620 patients enrolled (AC: n=308 / PC: n=306); 418 (68%) completed tests (AC: n=213 (69%) / PC: n=205 (67%)). Follow-up calls for unreturned kits--AC: 124 (40%) people called--29 returned FIT (9.4% of people called completed FIT). PC: 127 (41%) people called--26 returned FIT (9.4% of people called completed FIT). 2 nd -year screening: 255 second kits mailed out to date (AC: n=128/PC: n=125); 98 (38.5%) completed tests (AC: n=49 (38%) / PC: n=49 (39%)). Follow-up calls for unreturned kits--AC: 89 (70%) people called—19 returned FIT (14.8% of people called completed FIT). PC: 82 (66%) people called—17 returned FIT (13.6% of people called completed FIT). Discussion: Implementing health literacy influenced CRC education, and screening strategies using the FIT and phone reminders dramatically increased FIT completion in rural community clinics. The less costly and time-consuming automated call was equally effective as a personal call. Citation Format: Connie L. Arnold, Terry C. Davis, Alfred Rademaker, James Morris, Glenn Mills. Sustaining annual colorectal cancer screening in rural community health clinics using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B11.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:结直肠癌(CRC)是美国癌症死亡的第二大原因,如果早期发现,可以显着减少。尽管总体结直肠癌筛查率显著提高,但在低收入人群、识字率低的成年人和生活在农村地区的人群中,差异仍然存在。这些群体的筛查完成率都低于50%。目的:评估患者对结直肠癌筛查的知识、信念和自我效能,并比较两种健康素养知情电话随访策略的有效性,以改善农村社区诊所粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)三年期间的年度筛查。方法:在四个社区诊所实施一项两组随机对照试验。诊所报告CRC基线筛查率为3%至5%。符合条件的患者,年龄50-75岁,在预约之前在诊所招募。研究助理(RA)进行了基线结构化访谈,测量结直肠癌筛查知识,信念和自我效能。然后,RA建议进行筛查,并使用一本小册子(四年级水平)、带有预先写好地址信封的FIT工具包、简化说明(三年级水平)以及如何使用它的示范进行简短的扫盲和文化上适当的教育。在第四周,没有归还工具包的患者会收到来自中央预防协调员的个人随访电话(PC),使用动机性访谈技巧提醒他们完成并邮寄FIT工具包,或者2)自动随访电话(AC),使用简单的语言和动机性信息鼓励患者完成并邮寄FIT。结果包括干预后FIT完成,并在12个月和24个月再次完成FIT。结果:620名未接受最新筛查的患者入组:64%非裔美国人,56%女性,40%文化水平低下。虽然90%的人报告听说过结直肠癌,但只有64%的人知道检查结直肠癌的方法。70%的人报告说,医生过去曾建议进行结直肠癌筛查,91%的人报告说他们想知道自己是否患有结直肠癌。自我效能感很高,超过90%的人表示他们会把试剂盒送回实验室。筛查结果:纳入620例患者(AC: n=308 / PC: n=306);418例(68%)已完成测试(AC: n=213例(69%)/ PC: n=205例(67%))。对未退还试剂盒的后续电话-AC: 124人(40%)打电话-29人返回FIT(9.4%的人打电话完成FIT)。PC: 127人(41%)呼叫—26人返回FIT(9.4%的人呼叫完成FIT)。第2年筛查:255个已寄出的第二套试剂盒(AC: n=128/PC: n=125);98例(38.5%)完成测试(AC: n=49 (38%) / PC: n=49(39%))。未归还试剂盒的随访电话-AC: 89人(70%)- 19人返回FIT(14.8%的人称为完成FIT)。PC: 82人(66%)返回FIT(13.6%的人完成FIT)。讨论:实施健康素养影响了结直肠癌教育,使用FIT和电话提醒的筛查策略显著提高了农村社区诊所FIT的完成率。这种成本更低、耗时更短的自动电话与私人电话同样有效。引用格式:Connie L. Arnold, Terry C. Davis, Alfred Rademaker, James Morris, Glenn Mills。使用粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)在农村社区卫生诊所维持年度结直肠癌筛查[摘要]。见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr B11。
Abstract B11: Sustaining annual colorectal cancer screening in rural community health clinics using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, can be significantly reduced if it is detected early. Although overall CRC screening rates have increased significantly, disparities persist among low-income individuals, adults with low literacy, and those living in rural areas. These groups all have screening completion rates below 50%. Objectives: To assess patient knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy about CRC screening and compare the effectiveness of two health literacy informed telephone follow-up strategies to improve annual screening over a three-year period with fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in rural community clinics. Methods: A two-arm, randomized controlled trial is being implemented in four community clinics. Clinics reported CRC baseline screening rates of 3% to 5%. Eligible patients, age 50-75, were recruited at the clinic prior to a scheduled appointment. A research assistant (RA) conducted a baseline structured interview measuring CRC screening knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy. The RA then recommended screening and gave brief literacy and culturally appropriate education using a pamphlet (4 th -grade level), the FIT kit with preaddressed envelope, simplified instructions (3 rd -grade level), and a demonstration of how to use it. At four weeks patients who had not returned their kit received either 1) a personal follow-up call (PC) from a central prevention coordinator using motivational interviewing skills and reminding them to complete and mail FIT kits, or 2) an automated follow-up call (AC) using plain language and motivational messages encouraging patients to complete and mail the FIT. Outcomes include FIT completion after intervention, and again at 12 and 24 months. Results: 620 patients not up to date with screening were enrolled: 64% African American, 56% women, 40% inadequate literacy. Although 90% reported having heard of CRC, only 64% knew a test to check for CRC. 70% reported that a provider had recommended CRC screening in the past and 91% reported they would want to know if they have CRC. Self-efficacy was high, with over 90% indicating they would return the kit to the lab. Screening results: 620 patients enrolled (AC: n=308 / PC: n=306); 418 (68%) completed tests (AC: n=213 (69%) / PC: n=205 (67%)). Follow-up calls for unreturned kits--AC: 124 (40%) people called--29 returned FIT (9.4% of people called completed FIT). PC: 127 (41%) people called--26 returned FIT (9.4% of people called completed FIT). 2 nd -year screening: 255 second kits mailed out to date (AC: n=128/PC: n=125); 98 (38.5%) completed tests (AC: n=49 (38%) / PC: n=49 (39%)). Follow-up calls for unreturned kits--AC: 89 (70%) people called—19 returned FIT (14.8% of people called completed FIT). PC: 82 (66%) people called—17 returned FIT (13.6% of people called completed FIT). Discussion: Implementing health literacy influenced CRC education, and screening strategies using the FIT and phone reminders dramatically increased FIT completion in rural community clinics. The less costly and time-consuming automated call was equally effective as a personal call. Citation Format: Connie L. Arnold, Terry C. Davis, Alfred Rademaker, James Morris, Glenn Mills. Sustaining annual colorectal cancer screening in rural community health clinics using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B11.