利用贝叶斯信念网络评估在线课程设计

Lino Forner, Vivekanandan Kumar, Kinshuk
{"title":"利用贝叶斯信念网络评估在线课程设计","authors":"Lino Forner, Vivekanandan Kumar, Kinshuk","doi":"10.1109/T4E.2013.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even with recent research showing students enrolled in online courses are outperforming those in traditional courses, the need to assess the instructional design of online courses is greater than ever due to increasing enrollments and attrition rates that continue to be significantly higher than traditional courses. Most past research used surveys for course assessment, which measure only perceptions. Recently researchers have proposed more holistic assessments of online courses using Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to integrate multiple assessment instruments. While the advantages of BBNs for educational assessments have been demonstrated, past research used only simulated data. This study furthers past research by testing the suitability of BBN-based methodologies for real-time assessment of online courses using larger data sets with missing and sparse data. Testing used actual course data from two undergraduate online Java programming courses. Past literature identified the creation of the conditional probability tables (CPTs) as the greatest challenge of using BBNs. This research also investigated the automatic population of CPTs via software. Tests revealed excellent performance with large data sets demonstrating the scalability of BBN-based assessment methodologies for online courses with large enrollments. With a well-designed network, most of the CPTs can be populated via software, significantly reducing the time and effort required to design and use the BBN. A number of recommendations to improve usability, performance, and accuracy of BBN-based course assessment methodologies are demonstrated. Future research should provide a comparative analysis between BBNs and other methodologies for the assessment of online course design.","PeriodicalId":299216,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Design of Online Courses Using Bayesian Belief Networks\",\"authors\":\"Lino Forner, Vivekanandan Kumar, Kinshuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/T4E.2013.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even with recent research showing students enrolled in online courses are outperforming those in traditional courses, the need to assess the instructional design of online courses is greater than ever due to increasing enrollments and attrition rates that continue to be significantly higher than traditional courses. Most past research used surveys for course assessment, which measure only perceptions. Recently researchers have proposed more holistic assessments of online courses using Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to integrate multiple assessment instruments. While the advantages of BBNs for educational assessments have been demonstrated, past research used only simulated data. This study furthers past research by testing the suitability of BBN-based methodologies for real-time assessment of online courses using larger data sets with missing and sparse data. Testing used actual course data from two undergraduate online Java programming courses. Past literature identified the creation of the conditional probability tables (CPTs) as the greatest challenge of using BBNs. This research also investigated the automatic population of CPTs via software. Tests revealed excellent performance with large data sets demonstrating the scalability of BBN-based assessment methodologies for online courses with large enrollments. With a well-designed network, most of the CPTs can be populated via software, significantly reducing the time and effort required to design and use the BBN. A number of recommendations to improve usability, performance, and accuracy of BBN-based course assessment methodologies are demonstrated. Future research should provide a comparative analysis between BBNs and other methodologies for the assessment of online course design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管最近的研究表明,在线课程的学生表现比传统课程的学生要好,但由于在线课程的入学率和流失率持续显著高于传统课程,评估在线课程教学设计的需求比以往任何时候都要大。过去的大多数研究都是通过调查来评估课程,而这些调查只衡量人们的看法。最近,研究人员提出了使用贝叶斯信念网络(BBNs)来整合多种评估工具对在线课程进行更全面的评估。虽然bbn在教育评估方面的优势已经得到证明,但过去的研究只使用模拟数据。本研究通过使用包含缺失和稀疏数据的更大数据集测试基于bbn的在线课程实时评估方法的适用性,进一步推进了过去的研究。测试使用了两个本科在线Java编程课程的实际课程数据。过去的文献认为条件概率表(cpt)的创建是使用bbn的最大挑战。本研究还通过软件对cpt的自动种群进行了研究。测试显示,在大型数据集上表现出色,证明了基于bbn的评估方法对于大量注册的在线课程的可扩展性。通过设计良好的网络,大多数cpt都可以通过软件进行填充,从而大大减少了设计和使用BBN所需的时间和精力。本文提出了一些改进基于bbn的课程评估方法的可用性、性能和准确性的建议。未来的研究应提供bbn与其他在线课程设计评估方法之间的比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Design of Online Courses Using Bayesian Belief Networks
Even with recent research showing students enrolled in online courses are outperforming those in traditional courses, the need to assess the instructional design of online courses is greater than ever due to increasing enrollments and attrition rates that continue to be significantly higher than traditional courses. Most past research used surveys for course assessment, which measure only perceptions. Recently researchers have proposed more holistic assessments of online courses using Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to integrate multiple assessment instruments. While the advantages of BBNs for educational assessments have been demonstrated, past research used only simulated data. This study furthers past research by testing the suitability of BBN-based methodologies for real-time assessment of online courses using larger data sets with missing and sparse data. Testing used actual course data from two undergraduate online Java programming courses. Past literature identified the creation of the conditional probability tables (CPTs) as the greatest challenge of using BBNs. This research also investigated the automatic population of CPTs via software. Tests revealed excellent performance with large data sets demonstrating the scalability of BBN-based assessment methodologies for online courses with large enrollments. With a well-designed network, most of the CPTs can be populated via software, significantly reducing the time and effort required to design and use the BBN. A number of recommendations to improve usability, performance, and accuracy of BBN-based course assessment methodologies are demonstrated. Future research should provide a comparative analysis between BBNs and other methodologies for the assessment of online course design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信