低碳排放政策规制下双寡头企业动态竞争战略研究

Cai Songbo, Jiang Lu, Wang Xiang, D. Anderson, Silin Zhang
{"title":"低碳排放政策规制下双寡头企业动态竞争战略研究","authors":"Cai Songbo, Jiang Lu, Wang Xiang, D. Anderson, Silin Zhang","doi":"10.1109/LISS.2015.7369732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is based on the “dynamic game of perfect information” theory and the Stackelberg leadership model-investment in green technology. In the regulation of Mandatory Carbon Emissions Capacity, cap-and-trade and Carbon Emission Tax, this paper discusses the production-pricing decision and Nash equilibrium of enterprises that are not well-matched in strength in the dynamic game of perfect information, which prove two enterprises, under different policies, can come up with the optimum strategies and get corresponding expected profits, And Obtain the relations for Dynamic competitive strategies between market leader and followers, comparing the decisions under different Low-carbon Emission policies to analyze the environmental benefit and economical benefit. The results of this study manifests: Low-carbon Emission policy affects all the optimum strategies and expected profits of duopoly enterprises. And the further study proves the Mandatory Carbon Emissions Capacity and Cap-and-Trade have far greater impact on the expected profits of the enterprises, thus leading that expected profits is more indeterminate.","PeriodicalId":124091,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dynamic competitive strategy study of duopoly enterprises in the Low-carbon Emission policy regulation\",\"authors\":\"Cai Songbo, Jiang Lu, Wang Xiang, D. Anderson, Silin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LISS.2015.7369732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study is based on the “dynamic game of perfect information” theory and the Stackelberg leadership model-investment in green technology. In the regulation of Mandatory Carbon Emissions Capacity, cap-and-trade and Carbon Emission Tax, this paper discusses the production-pricing decision and Nash equilibrium of enterprises that are not well-matched in strength in the dynamic game of perfect information, which prove two enterprises, under different policies, can come up with the optimum strategies and get corresponding expected profits, And Obtain the relations for Dynamic competitive strategies between market leader and followers, comparing the decisions under different Low-carbon Emission policies to analyze the environmental benefit and economical benefit. The results of this study manifests: Low-carbon Emission policy affects all the optimum strategies and expected profits of duopoly enterprises. And the further study proves the Mandatory Carbon Emissions Capacity and Cap-and-Trade have far greater impact on the expected profits of the enterprises, thus leading that expected profits is more indeterminate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LISS.2015.7369732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LISS.2015.7369732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究基于“完全信息动态博弈”理论和Stackelberg领导模型——绿色技术投资。在碳强制排放能力规制、总量管制与交易规制和碳排放税规制中,讨论了在完全信息动态博弈中,实力不完全匹配的企业的生产定价决策和纳什均衡问题,证明了两家企业在不同的政策下都能提出最优策略并获得相应的预期利润,得到了市场领导者和市场追随者之间的动态竞争策略关系。比较不同低碳排放政策下的决策,分析环境效益和经济效益。研究结果表明:低碳排放政策影响双寡头企业的所有最优策略和期望利润。进一步研究表明,碳强制排放能力和限额与交易制度对企业预期利润的影响要大得多,从而导致企业预期利润更具不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dynamic competitive strategy study of duopoly enterprises in the Low-carbon Emission policy regulation
The study is based on the “dynamic game of perfect information” theory and the Stackelberg leadership model-investment in green technology. In the regulation of Mandatory Carbon Emissions Capacity, cap-and-trade and Carbon Emission Tax, this paper discusses the production-pricing decision and Nash equilibrium of enterprises that are not well-matched in strength in the dynamic game of perfect information, which prove two enterprises, under different policies, can come up with the optimum strategies and get corresponding expected profits, And Obtain the relations for Dynamic competitive strategies between market leader and followers, comparing the decisions under different Low-carbon Emission policies to analyze the environmental benefit and economical benefit. The results of this study manifests: Low-carbon Emission policy affects all the optimum strategies and expected profits of duopoly enterprises. And the further study proves the Mandatory Carbon Emissions Capacity and Cap-and-Trade have far greater impact on the expected profits of the enterprises, thus leading that expected profits is more indeterminate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信