{"title":"基于科学计量学的界面设计研究的比较分析","authors":"Zhuangyu Li, Haiyan Han","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to analyze the current situation and cutting-edge trends of\n interface design research in Chinese and international academia, as well as\n the respective research characteristics and paradigm differences between\n Chinese and foreign academia. VOSviewer and CiteSpace metrological\n visualization software were integrated to visualize and analyze the\n literature related to interface design research included in CNKI and Web of\n Science databases in terms of keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering ,\n keyword highlighting and highly cited literature by drawing knowledge maps.\n The results of the study show that the Chinese academic research on\n interface design focuses on the topics of graphical user interface,\n human-computer interaction, user experience, and usability, while the\n international academic research focuses on usability evaluation, intelligent\n user interface, adaptive user interface and augmented reality, etc. In terms\n of future research trends, the Chinese academic community focuses on user\n experience, eye tracking, visual design and other directions, while the\n international academic community starts to explore the direction of natural\n interaction from physical interaction, focusing on user experience, gesture\n recognition, natural user interface and other directions. In terms of\n research paradigms, the differences between Chinese and international\n academics are more significant, Chinese academics focus on qualitative\n research, while international academics focus on quantitative empirical\n research.","PeriodicalId":269162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of scientometric-based interface design research\",\"authors\":\"Zhuangyu Li, Haiyan Han\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1002908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to analyze the current situation and cutting-edge trends of\\n interface design research in Chinese and international academia, as well as\\n the respective research characteristics and paradigm differences between\\n Chinese and foreign academia. VOSviewer and CiteSpace metrological\\n visualization software were integrated to visualize and analyze the\\n literature related to interface design research included in CNKI and Web of\\n Science databases in terms of keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering ,\\n keyword highlighting and highly cited literature by drawing knowledge maps.\\n The results of the study show that the Chinese academic research on\\n interface design focuses on the topics of graphical user interface,\\n human-computer interaction, user experience, and usability, while the\\n international academic research focuses on usability evaluation, intelligent\\n user interface, adaptive user interface and augmented reality, etc. In terms\\n of future research trends, the Chinese academic community focuses on user\\n experience, eye tracking, visual design and other directions, while the\\n international academic community starts to explore the direction of natural\\n interaction from physical interaction, focusing on user experience, gesture\\n recognition, natural user interface and other directions. In terms of\\n research paradigms, the differences between Chinese and international\\n academics are more significant, Chinese academics focus on qualitative\\n research, while international academics focus on quantitative empirical\\n research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了分析国内外学术界界面设计研究的现状和前沿趋势,以及中外学术界各自的研究特点和范式差异。集成VOSviewer和CiteSpace计量可视化软件,通过绘制知识图谱,对CNKI和Web of Science数据库中与界面设计研究相关的文献从关键词共现、关键词聚类、关键词高亮、高被引文献等方面进行可视化分析。研究结果表明,中国学术界对界面设计的研究主要集中在图形用户界面、人机交互、用户体验和可用性等方面,而国际学术界对界面设计的研究主要集中在可用性评价、智能用户界面、自适应用户界面和增强现实等方面。从未来的研究趋势来看,中国学术界侧重于用户体验、眼动追踪、视觉设计等方向,而国际学术界则从物理交互开始探索自然交互方向,重点关注用户体验、手势识别、自然用户界面等方向。在研究范式方面,中国学者与国际学者的差异更为显著,中国学者注重定性研究,国际学者注重定量实证研究。
Comparative analysis of scientometric-based interface design research
In order to analyze the current situation and cutting-edge trends of
interface design research in Chinese and international academia, as well as
the respective research characteristics and paradigm differences between
Chinese and foreign academia. VOSviewer and CiteSpace metrological
visualization software were integrated to visualize and analyze the
literature related to interface design research included in CNKI and Web of
Science databases in terms of keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering ,
keyword highlighting and highly cited literature by drawing knowledge maps.
The results of the study show that the Chinese academic research on
interface design focuses on the topics of graphical user interface,
human-computer interaction, user experience, and usability, while the
international academic research focuses on usability evaluation, intelligent
user interface, adaptive user interface and augmented reality, etc. In terms
of future research trends, the Chinese academic community focuses on user
experience, eye tracking, visual design and other directions, while the
international academic community starts to explore the direction of natural
interaction from physical interaction, focusing on user experience, gesture
recognition, natural user interface and other directions. In terms of
research paradigms, the differences between Chinese and international
academics are more significant, Chinese academics focus on qualitative
research, while international academics focus on quantitative empirical
research.