基于科学计量学的界面设计研究的比较分析

Zhuangyu Li, Haiyan Han
{"title":"基于科学计量学的界面设计研究的比较分析","authors":"Zhuangyu Li, Haiyan Han","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to analyze the current situation and cutting-edge trends of\n interface design research in Chinese and international academia, as well as\n the respective research characteristics and paradigm differences between\n Chinese and foreign academia. VOSviewer and CiteSpace metrological\n visualization software were integrated to visualize and analyze the\n literature related to interface design research included in CNKI and Web of\n Science databases in terms of keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering ,\n keyword highlighting and highly cited literature by drawing knowledge maps.\n The results of the study show that the Chinese academic research on\n interface design focuses on the topics of graphical user interface,\n human-computer interaction, user experience, and usability, while the\n international academic research focuses on usability evaluation, intelligent\n user interface, adaptive user interface and augmented reality, etc. In terms\n of future research trends, the Chinese academic community focuses on user\n experience, eye tracking, visual design and other directions, while the\n international academic community starts to explore the direction of natural\n interaction from physical interaction, focusing on user experience, gesture\n recognition, natural user interface and other directions. In terms of\n research paradigms, the differences between Chinese and international\n academics are more significant, Chinese academics focus on qualitative\n research, while international academics focus on quantitative empirical\n research.","PeriodicalId":269162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of scientometric-based interface design research\",\"authors\":\"Zhuangyu Li, Haiyan Han\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1002908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to analyze the current situation and cutting-edge trends of\\n interface design research in Chinese and international academia, as well as\\n the respective research characteristics and paradigm differences between\\n Chinese and foreign academia. VOSviewer and CiteSpace metrological\\n visualization software were integrated to visualize and analyze the\\n literature related to interface design research included in CNKI and Web of\\n Science databases in terms of keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering ,\\n keyword highlighting and highly cited literature by drawing knowledge maps.\\n The results of the study show that the Chinese academic research on\\n interface design focuses on the topics of graphical user interface,\\n human-computer interaction, user experience, and usability, while the\\n international academic research focuses on usability evaluation, intelligent\\n user interface, adaptive user interface and augmented reality, etc. In terms\\n of future research trends, the Chinese academic community focuses on user\\n experience, eye tracking, visual design and other directions, while the\\n international academic community starts to explore the direction of natural\\n interaction from physical interaction, focusing on user experience, gesture\\n recognition, natural user interface and other directions. In terms of\\n research paradigms, the differences between Chinese and international\\n academics are more significant, Chinese academics focus on qualitative\\n research, while international academics focus on quantitative empirical\\n research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了分析国内外学术界界面设计研究的现状和前沿趋势,以及中外学术界各自的研究特点和范式差异。集成VOSviewer和CiteSpace计量可视化软件,通过绘制知识图谱,对CNKI和Web of Science数据库中与界面设计研究相关的文献从关键词共现、关键词聚类、关键词高亮、高被引文献等方面进行可视化分析。研究结果表明,中国学术界对界面设计的研究主要集中在图形用户界面、人机交互、用户体验和可用性等方面,而国际学术界对界面设计的研究主要集中在可用性评价、智能用户界面、自适应用户界面和增强现实等方面。从未来的研究趋势来看,中国学术界侧重于用户体验、眼动追踪、视觉设计等方向,而国际学术界则从物理交互开始探索自然交互方向,重点关注用户体验、手势识别、自然用户界面等方向。在研究范式方面,中国学者与国际学者的差异更为显著,中国学者注重定性研究,国际学者注重定量实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of scientometric-based interface design research
In order to analyze the current situation and cutting-edge trends of interface design research in Chinese and international academia, as well as the respective research characteristics and paradigm differences between Chinese and foreign academia. VOSviewer and CiteSpace metrological visualization software were integrated to visualize and analyze the literature related to interface design research included in CNKI and Web of Science databases in terms of keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering , keyword highlighting and highly cited literature by drawing knowledge maps. The results of the study show that the Chinese academic research on interface design focuses on the topics of graphical user interface, human-computer interaction, user experience, and usability, while the international academic research focuses on usability evaluation, intelligent user interface, adaptive user interface and augmented reality, etc. In terms of future research trends, the Chinese academic community focuses on user experience, eye tracking, visual design and other directions, while the international academic community starts to explore the direction of natural interaction from physical interaction, focusing on user experience, gesture recognition, natural user interface and other directions. In terms of research paradigms, the differences between Chinese and international academics are more significant, Chinese academics focus on qualitative research, while international academics focus on quantitative empirical research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信