{"title":"Konsten som kraftkälla eller livsförnekelse","authors":"Niclas Johansson","doi":"10.54797/tfl.v51i3-4.1660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Art as Vitalizing Source or Denial of Life: On Inger Edelfeldt’s Künstlerinromane\nThis article examines the role of art in the work of Swedish author Inger Edelfeldt. Based on an analysis of the short story “Skapelsen” (“The Creation,” 1995), the article argues that Edelfeldt’s literary works present two opposing views of art: art as an imitation of life and art as a source of life, which in turn are aligned with Nietzsche’s distinction between the Apollonian and the Dionysian. Furthermore, the article investigates how this distinction relates to Edelfeldt’s stories of the artist as heroine. The article argues that these stories fall into two major categories: the comic and utopian Künsterlinroman – exemplified by Hustru (Wife, 1978) and Det hemliga namnet (The Secret Name, 1999) – and the tragic and critical Künstlerinroman – exemplified by Konsten att dö (The Art of Dying, 2014). The analysis shows that these novels, while antithetical in tendency and structure, are organized by the same dialectic between the Apollonian and Dionysian and between art as an imitation of life and art as a source of life. While one side offers a naïvely utopian and individualistic picture of the woman artist in contemporary society, the other gives a realistic and critical perspective on the same subject. And the interconnection between the two views of art reveals a deeper complexity in the author’s portrayal of the contemporary woman artist than can be achieved through isolated analyses of her individual works.","PeriodicalId":202881,"journal":{"name":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v51i3-4.1660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
艺术是生命的活力源泉还是生命的否定:论英格·埃德尔菲尔德的k nstlerinromand本文考察了艺术在瑞典作家英格·埃德尔菲尔德作品中的作用。本文通过对短篇小说《斯卡佩尔森》(《创造》,1995)的分析,认为埃德尔菲尔德的文学作品呈现了两种对立的艺术观点:艺术是对生活的模仿,艺术是生活的源泉,这与尼采对阿波罗神和酒神的区分是一致的。此外,本文还探讨了这种区别是如何与埃德尔菲尔德将艺术家作为女主角的故事联系起来的。文章认为这些故事可以分为两大类:喜剧和乌托邦式的k nsterlinroman——以Hustru(《妻子》,1978)和Det hemliga namnet(《秘密的名字》,1999)为例;以及悲剧和批判式的k nsterlinroman——以Konsten att dö(《死亡的艺术》,2014)为例。分析表明,这些小说虽然在倾向和结构上都是对立的,但它们都是用同样的辩证法组织起来的,即阿波罗精神和酒神精神之间的辩证法,即模仿生活的艺术和作为生活源泉的艺术之间的辩证法。一方面为当代社会的女性艺术家提供了naïvely乌托邦和个人主义的画面,另一方面则对同一主题提供了现实主义和批判性的视角。这两种艺术观点之间的相互联系揭示了作者对当代女性艺术家的描绘中更深层次的复杂性,而不是通过对她个人作品的孤立分析来实现的。
Art as Vitalizing Source or Denial of Life: On Inger Edelfeldt’s Künstlerinromane
This article examines the role of art in the work of Swedish author Inger Edelfeldt. Based on an analysis of the short story “Skapelsen” (“The Creation,” 1995), the article argues that Edelfeldt’s literary works present two opposing views of art: art as an imitation of life and art as a source of life, which in turn are aligned with Nietzsche’s distinction between the Apollonian and the Dionysian. Furthermore, the article investigates how this distinction relates to Edelfeldt’s stories of the artist as heroine. The article argues that these stories fall into two major categories: the comic and utopian Künsterlinroman – exemplified by Hustru (Wife, 1978) and Det hemliga namnet (The Secret Name, 1999) – and the tragic and critical Künstlerinroman – exemplified by Konsten att dö (The Art of Dying, 2014). The analysis shows that these novels, while antithetical in tendency and structure, are organized by the same dialectic between the Apollonian and Dionysian and between art as an imitation of life and art as a source of life. While one side offers a naïvely utopian and individualistic picture of the woman artist in contemporary society, the other gives a realistic and critical perspective on the same subject. And the interconnection between the two views of art reveals a deeper complexity in the author’s portrayal of the contemporary woman artist than can be achieved through isolated analyses of her individual works.