小麦和大麦轮作末期作物的产量和植物检疫状况

N. Pegova
{"title":"小麦和大麦轮作末期作物的产量和植物检疫状况","authors":"N. Pegova","doi":"10.26897/0021-342x-2022-1-61-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article shows the analysis of the effect of long-term application (since 2006) of nonmoldboard and combined systems of main tillage in a crop rotation in comparison with annual moldboard tillage on productivity of spring wheat, yield and phytosanitary state of barley. The author studied tillage options in a cereal-grass rotation (71% cereals) with different types of fallow (clean, manured, clover and mustard) and with winter rye straw left in the field. Annual mouldboard tillage resulted in the highest yields of spring wheat and barley in the experiment – 2.90 and 2.31 t/ha. Annual nonmoldboard tillage resulted in a significant reduction in wheat yield to 2.61 t/ha and barley yield to 1.28 t/ha. The combined tillage system, alternating two mouldboard and four nonmoldboard treatments per rotation, ensured the wheat yield at the level of the mouldboard system – 2.82 t/ha, and a decrease in barley yields to 1.85 t/ha. In 2020, the limiting factor for barley yield formation in the variants with surface distribution of crop residues and straw was increased weed infestation and deterioration of the phytosanitary state of the crop. Straw had a depressive effect on the yield of the last crops in a crop rotation with pure fallow. Crop yields decreased by 0.43 and 0.26 t/ha. Wheat yield was 2.34 t/ha, barley yield was 1.41 t/ha. Green manure mustard and clover fallows leveled the depressive effect of straw. The yields of the 6th and 7th crops of the crop rotation were at the control level (2.69–2.78 t/ha of wheat and 1.70–1.81 t/ha of barley). Regardless of the tillage system and the use of by-products as organic fertilizer, the application of manure ensured the highest yields of the final crops of the rotation: 3.10 and 2.99 t/ha for spring wheat and 2.00 and 2.14 t/ha for barley.","PeriodicalId":332781,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiâ Timirâzevskoj selʹskohozâjstvennoj akademii","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YIELD AND PHYTOSANITARY STATE OF THE LAST CROPS OF THE CROP ROTATION OF WHEAT AND BARLEY\",\"authors\":\"N. Pegova\",\"doi\":\"10.26897/0021-342x-2022-1-61-70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article shows the analysis of the effect of long-term application (since 2006) of nonmoldboard and combined systems of main tillage in a crop rotation in comparison with annual moldboard tillage on productivity of spring wheat, yield and phytosanitary state of barley. The author studied tillage options in a cereal-grass rotation (71% cereals) with different types of fallow (clean, manured, clover and mustard) and with winter rye straw left in the field. Annual mouldboard tillage resulted in the highest yields of spring wheat and barley in the experiment – 2.90 and 2.31 t/ha. Annual nonmoldboard tillage resulted in a significant reduction in wheat yield to 2.61 t/ha and barley yield to 1.28 t/ha. The combined tillage system, alternating two mouldboard and four nonmoldboard treatments per rotation, ensured the wheat yield at the level of the mouldboard system – 2.82 t/ha, and a decrease in barley yields to 1.85 t/ha. In 2020, the limiting factor for barley yield formation in the variants with surface distribution of crop residues and straw was increased weed infestation and deterioration of the phytosanitary state of the crop. Straw had a depressive effect on the yield of the last crops in a crop rotation with pure fallow. Crop yields decreased by 0.43 and 0.26 t/ha. Wheat yield was 2.34 t/ha, barley yield was 1.41 t/ha. Green manure mustard and clover fallows leveled the depressive effect of straw. The yields of the 6th and 7th crops of the crop rotation were at the control level (2.69–2.78 t/ha of wheat and 1.70–1.81 t/ha of barley). Regardless of the tillage system and the use of by-products as organic fertilizer, the application of manure ensured the highest yields of the final crops of the rotation: 3.10 and 2.99 t/ha for spring wheat and 2.00 and 2.14 t/ha for barley.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izvestiâ Timirâzevskoj selʹskohozâjstvennoj akademii\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izvestiâ Timirâzevskoj selʹskohozâjstvennoj akademii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342x-2022-1-61-70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiâ Timirâzevskoj selʹskohozâjstvennoj akademii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342x-2022-1-61-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了长期(2006年以来)实行轮作主耕作与轮作主耕作联合制对春小麦生产力、大麦产量和植物检疫状况的影响,并与常年轮作作比较。作者研究了谷物-牧草轮作(71%的谷物)的耕作选择,不同类型的休耕(干净的、施肥的、三叶草和芥菜)和田间留下的冬季黑麦秸秆。试验中,一年制模板耕作的春小麦和大麦产量最高,分别为2.90和2.31吨/公顷。年度非耕作导致小麦产量显著降低至2.61吨/公顷,大麦产量显著降低至1.28吨/公顷。联合耕作制度,每轮交替进行2个模板和4个非模板处理,确保小麦产量保持在模板制的水平,即2.82吨/公顷,大麦产量下降到1.85吨/公顷。2020年,大麦产量形成的限制因素的变异与表面分布作物秸秆和稻草是增加杂草丛生,恶化的植物检疫的作物。在纯休耕轮作中,秸秆对末茬作物的产量有抑制作用。作物产量分别下降0.43和0.26吨/公顷。小麦产量2.34吨/公顷,大麦产量1.41吨/公顷。绿肥、芥菜和三叶草休耕消除了秸秆的压抑作用。轮作第6、7期作物产量为控制水平(小麦2.69 ~ 2.78 t/ha,大麦1.70 ~ 1.81 t/ha)。不考虑耕作制度和副产品作为有机肥的使用,施用粪肥保证了轮作末茬作物的最高产量:春小麦3.10和2.99吨/公顷,大麦2.00和2.14吨/公顷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
YIELD AND PHYTOSANITARY STATE OF THE LAST CROPS OF THE CROP ROTATION OF WHEAT AND BARLEY
The article shows the analysis of the effect of long-term application (since 2006) of nonmoldboard and combined systems of main tillage in a crop rotation in comparison with annual moldboard tillage on productivity of spring wheat, yield and phytosanitary state of barley. The author studied tillage options in a cereal-grass rotation (71% cereals) with different types of fallow (clean, manured, clover and mustard) and with winter rye straw left in the field. Annual mouldboard tillage resulted in the highest yields of spring wheat and barley in the experiment – 2.90 and 2.31 t/ha. Annual nonmoldboard tillage resulted in a significant reduction in wheat yield to 2.61 t/ha and barley yield to 1.28 t/ha. The combined tillage system, alternating two mouldboard and four nonmoldboard treatments per rotation, ensured the wheat yield at the level of the mouldboard system – 2.82 t/ha, and a decrease in barley yields to 1.85 t/ha. In 2020, the limiting factor for barley yield formation in the variants with surface distribution of crop residues and straw was increased weed infestation and deterioration of the phytosanitary state of the crop. Straw had a depressive effect on the yield of the last crops in a crop rotation with pure fallow. Crop yields decreased by 0.43 and 0.26 t/ha. Wheat yield was 2.34 t/ha, barley yield was 1.41 t/ha. Green manure mustard and clover fallows leveled the depressive effect of straw. The yields of the 6th and 7th crops of the crop rotation were at the control level (2.69–2.78 t/ha of wheat and 1.70–1.81 t/ha of barley). Regardless of the tillage system and the use of by-products as organic fertilizer, the application of manure ensured the highest yields of the final crops of the rotation: 3.10 and 2.99 t/ha for spring wheat and 2.00 and 2.14 t/ha for barley.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信