{"title":"SPCs的否定期限:STJ的323公式的范围和限制","authors":"Rizzatto Nunes","doi":"10.36751/rdh.v6i2.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article aims at to demonstrate that abridgement 323 of the STJ that fixed the stated period five year as limit for annotation in the cadastres calls of defaulters does not oppose §5o of article 43 of the CDC, leaving opened the possibility of notations limits in lesser periods of time","PeriodicalId":429341,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O prazo de negativa��o nos SPCs: alcance e limites da s�mula 323 do STJ\",\"authors\":\"Rizzatto Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.36751/rdh.v6i2.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present article aims at to demonstrate that abridgement 323 of the STJ that fixed the stated period five year as limit for annotation in the cadastres calls of defaulters does not oppose §5o of article 43 of the CDC, leaving opened the possibility of notations limits in lesser periods of time\",\"PeriodicalId\":429341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36751/rdh.v6i2.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36751/rdh.v6i2.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
O prazo de negativa��o nos SPCs: alcance e limites da s�mula 323 do STJ
The present article aims at to demonstrate that abridgement 323 of the STJ that fixed the stated period five year as limit for annotation in the cadastres calls of defaulters does not oppose §5o of article 43 of the CDC, leaving opened the possibility of notations limits in lesser periods of time