{"title":"学前教育机构教师专业反思对其社会智力素质的影响问题","authors":"E. Ivashkevych, O. Hudyma","doi":"10.32626/2227-6246.2023-60.9-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the purpose of our article is: to investigate the problem of the influence of professional reflection of teachers of preschool educational establishments on the qualities of their social intelligence; according to the results having been ob-tained in the experiment to describe the structure of social intelligence of teach-ers of preschool educational establishments methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. Also, in our research we used such empirical methods as statement study and molding experiment. With the aim to diagnose the level of the development of social intelligence of teachers we used the test of J. Gilford and M.O’ Sullivan “Research of Social Intelligence”, adapted by E.S. Mikhailova (Гилфорд & О’Салливен, 2021).the results of the research. We think, that the functioning of social intel-ligence as a group of abilities and capabilities of the individual takes place at three levels, which allow us to reflect the dynamic nature of this phenomenon. In the structure of social intelligence we distinguish the potential level, which contains the potential abilities and possibilities of the individual, which are at the stage of the development with the name “the actual level”, which includes the abilities and possibilities of the person. This level has a normative (medium and a high) level of its development, and the effective level, which contains such personality’s characteristics that highlight the peculiarities of the explanation of these abilities in the sphere of cognitive activity of the person.conclusions. We proved, that a variety of characteristics directly related to the social intelligence of the person, reflects its diverse peculiarities. At the same time, in defining these characteristics that predetermine the development of social intelligence, there are a number of common points. First of all, they are interpreted as the ability, therefore, directly interrelated with certain activities. Secondly, the subject of these abilities is the possibility of the person to establish connections between events in which actors are other people. Thirdly, in whatever context social intellect was described in scientific theories and concepts, it is in any case presented as a rather complex structural formation consisting of different abilities and possibilities. Also, the accuracy of the understanding of other people, the adequacy of interpretation, prediction and reflection are the main indicators of the presence or absence of the person’s ability to solve tasks in order to establish the relationship between events in the subjectsubject com-munication and interaction","PeriodicalId":250456,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The problem of the Influence of Professional Reflection of Teachers of Preschool Educational Establishments on the Qualities of their Social Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"E. Ivashkevych, O. Hudyma\",\"doi\":\"10.32626/2227-6246.2023-60.9-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the purpose of our article is: to investigate the problem of the influence of professional reflection of teachers of preschool educational establishments on the qualities of their social intelligence; according to the results having been ob-tained in the experiment to describe the structure of social intelligence of teach-ers of preschool educational establishments methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. Also, in our research we used such empirical methods as statement study and molding experiment. With the aim to diagnose the level of the development of social intelligence of teachers we used the test of J. Gilford and M.O’ Sullivan “Research of Social Intelligence”, adapted by E.S. Mikhailova (Гилфорд & О’Салливен, 2021).the results of the research. We think, that the functioning of social intel-ligence as a group of abilities and capabilities of the individual takes place at three levels, which allow us to reflect the dynamic nature of this phenomenon. In the structure of social intelligence we distinguish the potential level, which contains the potential abilities and possibilities of the individual, which are at the stage of the development with the name “the actual level”, which includes the abilities and possibilities of the person. This level has a normative (medium and a high) level of its development, and the effective level, which contains such personality’s characteristics that highlight the peculiarities of the explanation of these abilities in the sphere of cognitive activity of the person.conclusions. We proved, that a variety of characteristics directly related to the social intelligence of the person, reflects its diverse peculiarities. At the same time, in defining these characteristics that predetermine the development of social intelligence, there are a number of common points. First of all, they are interpreted as the ability, therefore, directly interrelated with certain activities. Secondly, the subject of these abilities is the possibility of the person to establish connections between events in which actors are other people. Thirdly, in whatever context social intellect was described in scientific theories and concepts, it is in any case presented as a rather complex structural formation consisting of different abilities and possibilities. Also, the accuracy of the understanding of other people, the adequacy of interpretation, prediction and reflection are the main indicators of the presence or absence of the person’s ability to solve tasks in order to establish the relationship between events in the subjectsubject com-munication and interaction\",\"PeriodicalId\":250456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collection of Research Papers \\\"Problems of Modern Psychology\\\"\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collection of Research Papers \\\"Problems of Modern Psychology\\\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-60.9-29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-60.9-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在探讨学前教育机构教师的专业反思对其社会智力素质的影响问题;根据已获得的实验结果,阐述了学前教育机构教师社会智力结构的研究方法。本研究采用了以下理论方法来解决本文提出的任务:分类法、结构与功能法、分析法、系统化法、建模法、泛化法。在本文的研究中,我们采用了陈述研究和模塑实验等实证方法。为了诊断教师的社会智力发展水平,我们使用了J. Gilford和M.O ' Sullivan的“社会智力研究”的测试,由E.S. Mikhailova改编(Гилфорд & О ' Салливен, 2021)。研究的结果。我们认为,作为一组能力和个人能力的社会智力在三个层面上发挥作用,这使我们能够反映出这一现象的动态本质。在社会智力的结构中,我们区分潜能层次,潜能层次包含了个体处于发展阶段的潜在能力和可能性,称之为“实际层次”,潜能层次包含了个体的能力和可能性。这一层次有其发展的规范(中等和高)水平和有效水平,其中包含了这样的人格特征,突出了在个人认知活动领域解释这些能力的特殊性。我们证明,与人的社会智力直接相关的各种特征,反映了其多样的特殊性。与此同时,在定义这些预先决定社会智力发展的特征时,有一些共同点。首先,它们被解释为能力,因此,与某些活动直接相关。其次,这些能力的主体是人在行动者是其他人的事件之间建立联系的可能性。第三,无论在何种背景下,社会智力在科学理论和概念中被描述,它在任何情况下都是由不同的能力和可能性组成的相当复杂的结构形式。此外,对他人理解的准确性、解释、预测和反思的充分性是判断人是否具备解决任务能力的主要指标,以建立主体与主体之间的沟通和互动关系
The problem of the Influence of Professional Reflection of Teachers of Preschool Educational Establishments on the Qualities of their Social Intelligence
the purpose of our article is: to investigate the problem of the influence of professional reflection of teachers of preschool educational establishments on the qualities of their social intelligence; according to the results having been ob-tained in the experiment to describe the structure of social intelligence of teach-ers of preschool educational establishments methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. Also, in our research we used such empirical methods as statement study and molding experiment. With the aim to diagnose the level of the development of social intelligence of teachers we used the test of J. Gilford and M.O’ Sullivan “Research of Social Intelligence”, adapted by E.S. Mikhailova (Гилфорд & О’Салливен, 2021).the results of the research. We think, that the functioning of social intel-ligence as a group of abilities and capabilities of the individual takes place at three levels, which allow us to reflect the dynamic nature of this phenomenon. In the structure of social intelligence we distinguish the potential level, which contains the potential abilities and possibilities of the individual, which are at the stage of the development with the name “the actual level”, which includes the abilities and possibilities of the person. This level has a normative (medium and a high) level of its development, and the effective level, which contains such personality’s characteristics that highlight the peculiarities of the explanation of these abilities in the sphere of cognitive activity of the person.conclusions. We proved, that a variety of characteristics directly related to the social intelligence of the person, reflects its diverse peculiarities. At the same time, in defining these characteristics that predetermine the development of social intelligence, there are a number of common points. First of all, they are interpreted as the ability, therefore, directly interrelated with certain activities. Secondly, the subject of these abilities is the possibility of the person to establish connections between events in which actors are other people. Thirdly, in whatever context social intellect was described in scientific theories and concepts, it is in any case presented as a rather complex structural formation consisting of different abilities and possibilities. Also, the accuracy of the understanding of other people, the adequacy of interpretation, prediction and reflection are the main indicators of the presence or absence of the person’s ability to solve tasks in order to establish the relationship between events in the subjectsubject com-munication and interaction