上图新闻:联邦航空管理局禁止商用无人机的第一修正案影响

Cynthia Love, Sean Lawson, A. Holton
{"title":"上图新闻:联邦航空管理局禁止商用无人机的第一修正案影响","authors":"Cynthia Love, Sean Lawson, A. Holton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3211640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), commonly referred to as drones, have rocketed to public attention in the last decade, largely as a result of the U.S. military's use of this technology in the \"War on Terror.\" As UASs have come home and have been put to a growing number of uses in domestic airspace, the Federal Aviation Administration has attempted to ban their commercial use. Efforts to enforce this ban have included sending dozens of cease-and-desist letters to UAS operators and even one attempt to levy a $10,000 fine. Most often, these UAS operators have been engaging in aerial photography, sometimes for news-gathering purposes. To date, little attention has been paid to the First Amendment implications of the ban. This article argues that aerial photography with UASs, whether commercial or not, is protected First Amendment activity, particularly for news-gathering purposes. The FAA must take First Amendment?protected uses of this technology into account as it proceeds with meeting its congressional mandate to promulgate rules for domestic UASs.","PeriodicalId":278996,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Planning & Policy eJournal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"News from Above: First Amendment Implications of the Federal Aviation Administration Ban on Commercial Drones\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Love, Sean Lawson, A. Holton\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3211640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), commonly referred to as drones, have rocketed to public attention in the last decade, largely as a result of the U.S. military's use of this technology in the \\\"War on Terror.\\\" As UASs have come home and have been put to a growing number of uses in domestic airspace, the Federal Aviation Administration has attempted to ban their commercial use. Efforts to enforce this ban have included sending dozens of cease-and-desist letters to UAS operators and even one attempt to levy a $10,000 fine. Most often, these UAS operators have been engaging in aerial photography, sometimes for news-gathering purposes. To date, little attention has been paid to the First Amendment implications of the ban. This article argues that aerial photography with UASs, whether commercial or not, is protected First Amendment activity, particularly for news-gathering purposes. The FAA must take First Amendment?protected uses of this technology into account as it proceeds with meeting its congressional mandate to promulgate rules for domestic UASs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Planning & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Planning & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Planning & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

无人驾驶飞机系统(UASs),通常被称为无人机,在过去十年中迅速引起公众的注意,主要是因为美国军方在“反恐战争”中使用了这项技术。随着无人机回国,并在国内空域越来越多地使用,美国联邦航空管理局(Federal Aviation Administration)试图禁止它们的商业用途。执行这一禁令的努力包括向无人机运营商发送数十封勒令停止函,甚至有一次试图征收1万美元的罚款。大多数情况下,这些无人机操作员一直在从事航空摄影,有时是为了收集新闻。迄今为止,很少有人关注这项禁令对第一修正案的影响。本文认为,无人机的航空摄影,无论是否商业,都是受第一修正案保护的活动,特别是出于新闻采集目的。联邦航空局必须遵守第一修正案?考虑到这项技术的保护用途,因为它正在履行其国会授权,颁布国内无人驾驶飞机的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
News from Above: First Amendment Implications of the Federal Aviation Administration Ban on Commercial Drones
Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), commonly referred to as drones, have rocketed to public attention in the last decade, largely as a result of the U.S. military's use of this technology in the "War on Terror." As UASs have come home and have been put to a growing number of uses in domestic airspace, the Federal Aviation Administration has attempted to ban their commercial use. Efforts to enforce this ban have included sending dozens of cease-and-desist letters to UAS operators and even one attempt to levy a $10,000 fine. Most often, these UAS operators have been engaging in aerial photography, sometimes for news-gathering purposes. To date, little attention has been paid to the First Amendment implications of the ban. This article argues that aerial photography with UASs, whether commercial or not, is protected First Amendment activity, particularly for news-gathering purposes. The FAA must take First Amendment?protected uses of this technology into account as it proceeds with meeting its congressional mandate to promulgate rules for domestic UASs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信